Antimatter's tags:

Michael Specter at The New Yorker in a recent article, “Darwin’s Surprise,” reports on a discovery that should have significant ramifications for any creationist. The human genetic code shares thousands of retroviruses in the exact same positions as our closest living relatives, the monkeys and chimpanzees. This can only be explained if we inherited these retroviruses from a common ancestor. If creationism were true and a “designer” created each species much like they exist today, the odds that germ cells in each higher primate species would be infected by the same retroviruses in the same positions are simply astronomical.

“… Scientists have long suspected that if a retrovirus happens to infect a human sperm cell or egg, which is rare, and if that embryo survives—which is rarer still—the retrovirus could take its place in the blueprint of our species, passed from mother to child, and from one generation to the next, much like a gene for eye color or asthma.

“When the sequence of the human genome was fully mapped, in 2003, researchers also discovered something they had not anticipated: our bodies are littered with the shards of such retroviruses, fragments of the chemical code from which all genetic material is made. It takes less than two per cent of our genome to create all the proteins necessary for us to live. Eight per cent, however, is composed of broken and disabled retroviruses, which, millions of years ago, managed to embed themselves in the DNA of our ancestors. They are called endogenous retroviruses, because once they infect the DNA of a species they become part of that species. …

“Darwin’s surprise almost certainly would be mixed with delight: when he suggested, in ‘The Descent of Man’ (1871), that humans and apes shared a common ancestor, it was a revolutionary idea, and it remains one today. Yet nothing provides more convincing evidence for the ‘theory’ of evolution than the viruses contained within our DNA. Until recently, the earliest available information about the history and the course of human diseases, like smallpox and typhus, came from mummies no more than four thousand years old. Evolution cannot be measured in a time span that short. Endogenous retroviruses provide a trail of molecular bread crumbs leading millions of years into the past.

“Darwin’s theory makes sense, though, only if humans share most of those viral fragments with relatives like chimpanzees and monkeys. And we do, in thousands of places throughout our genome. If that were a coincidence, humans and chimpanzees would have had to endure an incalculable number of identical viral infections in the course of millions of years, and then, somehow, those infections would have had to end up in exactly the same place within each genome. The rungs of the ladder of human DNA consist of three billion pairs of nucleotides spread across forty-six chromosomes. The sequences of those nucleotides determine how each person differs from another, and from all other living things. The only way that humans, in thousands of seemingly random locations, could possess the exact retroviral DNA found in another species is by inheriting it from a common ancestor.”


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • bloc said on Nov 27, 2007....
    fascinating, and convincing. 
  • tbs230 said on Nov 27, 2007....
    I don't understand...layman's terms please?
  • Antimatter said on Nov 28, 2007....
    The probability that we do not share a common descent with the other higher primates is 1 in a very, very large number.
  • kelly said on Dec 02, 2007....
    This is indeed fascinating, but I'm not sure it provides "proof" to people who apparently do not require proof to believe in anything.  Can't a flat-earther just say that god created all this at the same time and thus that is the reason we have so much in common with other primates?  Maybe god is just into code re-use.  :-)

    I'm not as up on things as I should be, either.  I had no idea we only need 2% of our genome for survival.  Wild.
  • Antimatter said on Feb 26, 2008....
    Kelly: Yes, a flat-earther could say that. But then he'd be faced with the theological conundrum of god creating animals pre-infected with viruses, presumably before the Fall and introduction of sin.
  • kelly said on Mar 01, 2008....
    Ah, yes, but god would have known ahead of time that Adam and Eve would mess things up.  Heck, even I would have known that.  :-)  But wait, why would a god create something that is faulty?  Double wait,  how is it even possible for a god to create something that is faulty?  Triple wait, if a god creates something that it knows is faulty yet is incapable of fault, then is a faulty world perfect?

    In the end I prefer scientific thought.

Comment on "Human Retroviruses"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Hello, I am the only Sac Darwinist in the world.
My name comes from the term "Sac Religious". The people that follow Darwin's THERORY of evolution with a DEEP longing passion. Just as if it were a Religion. It brings a tear to my eye to see people c...
rewind...rewind...rewind...

breaking down...breaking down...breaking down...

medication? NO! Not going back...

need... but schism... practicality... psychology degree... or go for the creative self... acting... arti...

Subscribe to the SoulCast Newsletter To Receive the Best Uncensored Blogs About Love, Sex, Relationships, God, Politics, and More.


Ever wonder what people really think and how they really live?

Read about the real lives of regular people like you whose powerful moving blogs will make you smile, cry, emotional, and warm inside.

Your FREE SoulCast newsletter is just moments away. Receive your first feel-good blog by entering your email address below.

First Name:
Your Email:


You can unsubscribe at any time with one click. We NEVER sell or share your email address with anyone. Period. close