lfbno7's tags:

The page you were looking for no longer exists


JPost.com » Middle East » Article
Iran denies religious dress code law

PrintSubscribe articleTitle = ' Iran denies religious dress code law '; showOdiogoReadNowButton ('1002,1003,1005,1004,1006,1484,1560',articleTitle,'0', 290, 55); Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.comToolbar
showInitialOdiogoReadNowFrame ('1002,1003,1005,1004,1006,1484,1560', '0', 290, 0);

Iranian officials on Saturday denied a report published by the Canadian National Post on the previous day, claiming that a new dress-code law was passed in Iran this past week, which mandates the government to make sure that religious minorities - Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians - will have to adopt distinct color schemes to make them identifiable in public.

Jews were forced by law to wear yellow stars in public in Nazi Germany.
Photo: AP

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denied Wednesday his country provides Hizbullah with arms.
Photo: AP [file]

The National Post later cited experts saying that the idea of religious demarcation had only arisen in discussing a law defining Iranian dress code. The paper quoted an Iranian commentator who said the idea of external identification of non-Muslim minorities was only raised as a secondary motion.

The talkback quota is full. To write a talkback, click here.

Legislator Emad Afroogh, who sponsored the bill and chairs the parliament's cultural committee, told The Associated Press on Friday there was no truth to the Canadian newspaper report.

"It's a sheer lie. The rumors about this are worthless," he said, explaining that the bill seeks only to make women dress more conservatively and avoid Western fashions. "The bill is not related to minorities. It is only about clothing," he said. "Please tell them (in the West) to check the details of the bill. There is no mention of religious minorities and their clothing in the bill," he said.

Iranian Jewish lawmaker Morris Motamed told the AP: "Such a plan has never been proposed or discussed in parliament. Such news, which appeared abroad, is an insult to religious minorities here."

A diplomat at Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York called the report "completely false."

"We reject that. It is not true. The minorities in Iran are completely free and are represented in the Iranian parliament," the diplomat said, speaking anonymously because he was not allowed to make official statements.

Whether approved as law or not, the proposal demanded that Jews will have to wear a yellow band on their exterior in public, while Christians will be required to don red ones.

The new law was drafted during the presidency of Muhammad Khatami in 2004, but was blocked. That blockage, however, has been removed under pressure from current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In addition to the requirements on non-Muslims, the Iranian government has also envisioned that all Muslim Iranians wear "standard Islamic garments" designed to remove ethnic and class distinctions.

The purpose for the law was to prevent Muslims from becoming najis "unclean" by accidentally shaking the hands of non-Muslims in public.

According to Ahmadinejad, reported the National Post, the new Islamic uniforms will establish "visual equality" for Iranians as they prepare for the return of the Hidden Imam.

The final shape of the uniforms is yet to be established but there is consensus on a number of points.

The United States issued a strong condemnation on Friday of the reported proposal. US State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said any such measure would be "despicable" and carry "clear echoes of Germany under Hitler."

Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter responded to the new law Friday night, saying, "Whoever makes Jews anywhere wear the yellow star again, will find themselves in a coffin draped in black."

Ophir Paz-Pines, minister-without-portfolio responsible for culture, sports, science and technology, who is also a member of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, called on the government's secretary to ensure the issue be immediately addressed during the next Cabinet meeting.

"The State of Israel was created after the Holocaust in order to ensure it would not be repeated. The yellow star is a bright red warning sign that obligates us to muster the entire world in the face of events there [Iran]."

Paz-Pines also called on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to make the issue his top priority when he visits Washington D.C. next week to meet US President George W. Bush.

Meretz Chairman Yossi Beilin said, "Israel could no longer be satisfied with warnings, and that the moment Jews are forced to wear the yellow band, Israel must act to evacuate all Jews from Iran." He added that, "Israel must stand at the forefront of efforts to separate Iran's crazy and Hitlerite regime from government control."

"The new law resembles the Holocaust," said head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, Rabbi Marvin Heir, and warned that, "Iran was nearing Nazi Ideology."

According to Army Radio, Wiesenthal Center officials sent a letter to United Nations Director General Kofi Annan urging him "not to ignore" the new law, and reminded him that, "The world ignored Hitler for many years."

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations released a statement saying, "We have been seeking to clarify these reports but do not yet have confirmation. There are clear indications that various Iranian government agencies, including the Ministry of Commerce and Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, are working on new uniforms to be introduced in the fall.

"While such legislation would be reminiscent of dark periods in the past, like the Nazi era when Jews and others had to wear identifying badges, it is also consistent with the racist and extremist ideology propagated by President Ahmadinejad.

We are monitoring the situation and seeking to ascertain the facts in order to determine the appropriate response."



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • lfbno7 said on Oct 14, 2007....

    Laws in place since the 1979 Islamic Revolution require women to wear charor, meaning a headscarf to cover their hair and a long overcoat to hide their figures.

    But in the past decade, enforcement has grown lax and women - particularly in Teheran - commonly wear scarves that leave almost their entire heads bare and short, form-fitting jackets instead of overcoats.

    The bill makes no specific mention of women but says it aims to "encourage the public to abstain from choosing clothes that aren't appropriate to the culture of Iran."



    What kind of fucking pig country tells you how to dress?  Motherfucking crazy bastards.  They need a Thomas Jefferson.  They need the Adams boys, Sam and John.  They need a new revolution to kick these evil pricks out.  Why do these morons have no concept of human rights?  Why do they have to control everything and everyone?  I have no tolerance for their intolerance.  Ignorant fucking bastards.

  • silverwhisper said on Oct 14, 2007....
    this right here is why theocracies are a bad idea.

    ed
  • pickersplock said on Oct 14, 2007....
    That's sick.
  • gingersoul said on Oct 14, 2007....

    LF.......does this surprise you so much? I am not surprised. The women are already wearing their yellow star only is called "chador"....and they already cant shake hands with any male because THEY are impure and they might contaminate the men.....

    when Christian Ananpour interviewd a political rapresentive in Teheran she had to wear the chador, she couldn't shake his hand and neither he could look in her eyes because of fear he migth be "polluted" ......

    From this behavior to the idea of marking all the other impure people the step is really short....

  • lfbno7 said on Oct 14, 2007....
    Well I can understand it with women but not with men.

    Okay, I'm running away now.  Only kidding, I promise.  Ya see, my sense of humor is on the dark side.  Owww, stop it, oww, I was only kidding, owwwwww.
  • cotteralladams3 said on Oct 14, 2007....
    It's amazing to me that some people take 'their side' as if America and Israel 'imposed' this regime on them, and yes, I do know the history of American interference in Iran but it doesn't account for a prejudicial form of persecution such as this.  The government takes out its anger on minorities because of the inability of the American government to solve the conflict, which can't solved so simply.  Iran had started on a course of persecuting minorities long before the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia.  While I never agreed with any of these actions on the part of the government, it still doesn't explain accusations of political hegemony by the U.S. against Iran when it isn't Sunni Muslim, Pashtun or Arab and hasn't been invaded.  That this government chose its path long before American foreign policy and U.N. policy on Iran came into effect demonstrates what historically they have stood for and many international Baha'i and Jewish organizations can testify to this effect with evidence, eye witness accounts and through various trips they have taken to the region, what exactly is going on there.  It is convenient and politically correct to blame America for the deep hatred of minorities that exists in Persia and which is a cultural and historical trait based on purity of ethnicty and excessive nationalism.  All of this is reinforced by their views on the role of religion in society and by their politics.
  • kelly said on Oct 18, 2007....
    " I have no tolerance for their intolerance. "

    Precisely.  Which is a bit of a conundrum, but there it is.  
  • crybabylu said on Nov 01, 2007....
    Well said, kelly.
  • cotteralladams3 said on Nov 01, 2007....
    It is so unfortunate that this is allowed to go on. I watched a series of documentaries by Christiane Amanpour and she criticized Israel and the Christian evangelists of America but was very soft on Iran.  Is it because she is half-Persian herself?  She can travel on a British passport.  She is an excellent and intelligent journalist but not exactly objective.  She accused AIPAC of running American foreign policy and sided with Jimmy Carter and his publication of 'Palestine: Peace not Apartheid'.  I was shocked by that book in the bookstore.  I was appalled by the misuse of the word 'apartheid'. 
     
    No wonder I have my frustrations with leftist-libs and social democrats-their skewed ways of thinking-it is not surprising to me that there is racial and ethnic tension in North America and political correctness and special ideas of entitlement have a lot to do with it. It is not helpful to antagonize minorities and the majority-another issue-but I'd be willing to consider a good perspective on the Palestinian side of the conflict if it didn't involve criticizing Israel for the land-for-peace deal, for refusing to negotiate the right of return for Palestinian refugees into Israel, blame them for putting up the wall, accuse them of apartheid, blame them for Iran and on and on....I mean, please, they have their side of the conflict but can someone for once not justify their extremist political mentality with terrorists being referred to as 'freedom fighters'?  It shocks me that the Left thinks it is always right and has the arrogance and intolerance to suppress opinion. 
     
    I know there are good people on the Left concerned about refugees, human rights, women's rights, the environment, immigrants, multiculturalism, etc..and I understand it but I am flippin' tired of extremist P.C. rhetoric used to destroy debate and honesty.  It leads to dysfunctonal communication, excessive sensitivity, false concepts of superiority and tension between groups that must live together.

Comment on "Iran flirts with idea to force Jews to wear star"

iran religion theocracy islam (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

Side splitting humor is now here~
http://www.hanifworld.com/persianfun.htm
What a stoning treat!...
Being on this site and meet people of various ethnic background and different beliefs....
NOW HERE'S A QUESTION...
Kennedy get banned from communion for his stance on abortion......
It's okay if you disagree ... but when leaving a comment, please dont be a childish douche and resort to namecalling and insults....