Some people are suggesting that the memory of the 9/11 phenomenon should be toned down a bit, especially because, over the years, most people have gradually forgotten equally landmark tragedies - like Louisiana's Katrina disaster and:
[....As the ragged nature of life pushes on, it is natural that the national fixation on an ominous event becomes ruptured and its anniversary starts to wear out. Once-indelible dates no longer even incite curiosity. On Feb. 15, how many turn backward to the sinking of the battleship Maine in 1898?
Few Americans give much thought anymore on Dec. 7 that Pearl Harbor was attacked in 1941 (the date to live in infamy). Similar subdued attention is paid to other scarring tragedies: the Kennedy assassination (Nov. 22, 1963), Kent State (May 4, 1970), the Oklahoma City bombing (April 19, 1995).
Generations, of course, turn over. Few are alive anymore who can recall June 15, 1904, when 1,021 people died in the burning of the steamer General Slocum, the deadliest New York City disaster until Sept. 11, 2001. Also, the weight of new wrenching events crowds the national memory. Already since Sept. 11, there have been Katrina and Virginia Tech. And people have their own more circumscribed agonies....]
What do you think? Have you grown weary of remembering disasters?
Is it better for the grieving families to be left to bear their loss or should the government continue to make such tragedies a public day of mourning?
Should the crying ever stop? I just need your opinions - I am not making any inherent statements of mine by posing the questions above, BTW.



