• StupidGenius said on Jul 06, 2007....

  It is interesting that a human man has the right to tell other people who is a saint. He has the power to create saints and declare that despite the risk of desease you shouldnt wear a condom.
   
  Natural selction is the logical choice of the non delusional.
   
  http://www.soulcast.com/post/show/76122/Natural-Selection

• ThePainfulTruthBFTW said on Jul 06, 2007....

  SG...

  I agree, man does not have the power to name Saints. I never said that he did and I never called Mary one. I’ll just say that I believe that Catholics (and a lot of others) don’t spend enough time reading their own bible and rely on someone else to tell them what is in it. Oh, and praying to the Saints that are "ordained by the Church" rather than to God, as if God can’t decide for himself who will become a Saint, and as if a Saint is someone other than just a good and faithful servant to The Lord. What if the Church picked the wrong person and all those prayers went to someone who could do nothing? As if God couldn’t or is too over worked to handle it. You better get the right Saint on the line and during the right business hours because God or Jesus doesn’t handle that themselves .I believe that the continuos worship of "Saints" detracts from God and Jesus Christ. It’s been "my" experience that the Virgin Marry gets more prayer and credit than The Lord and Savior whom (Catholics) they claim to worship. It sickens me!

  You can keep your natural selection/evolution crap it ain’t gonna fly here and here is why.

  The word "dinosaur" was originally coined in 1841, more than three thousand years after the Bible first referred to "Tanniyn." In 1822, Mary Ann Mantell became the first person to discover and correctly identify a strange bone as part of a large, unknown reptile. Her husband, Dr. Gideon Mantell, later named this creature an "Iguanodon." From that time forward, these forgotten animals were given names chosen by the people who rediscovered them. Of course, the Bible, written between approximately 1450 BC and 95 AD, does not include any of these names.

  Unfortunately, our public school system and the media have convinced us that dinosaurs were extinct at least 60 million years before man appeared on earth. They site carbon 14 dating as their evidence. The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years). This is the "half-life." So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years. Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable 14C left. That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give millions of years. In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good evidence that it is not millions of years old. The bible states that a day onto The Lord is as a thousand years. The fact is that dinosaurs were created no more than one day (1,000 years) before mankind as stated in the book of Gneiss.

  It’s true there is no consequence for believing in one true God and believing that his way is right and true. What do I have to lose? His way is good and does not serve my own selfishness. I tend to hurt fewer people and stay out of trouble and am promised a home with him in the here after. What do I miss out on either way, right or wrong? A rash of bad decisions, illness, heartache, jacked up relationships, and hurting others to serve my own wants (not needs), because I chose to act like an animal from which I hope I’m descended from. If you are wrong and there is a God, a creator, and you deny him, what then for you? Sure you had a blast, did your own thing, and denied yourself nothing, but did you profit and what trail of destruction (physical or mental) did you leave behind? What awaits you after you are gone? Should the creator accept you after you denied him…just because you thought you had it all figured out and wanted to do things your way or the way of a chimp?

   

  I’m not judging. That would be me saying that you’re going to hell. That is not for me to decide. I’m just pointing out something. Call it pointing out an unseen trap and trying to help you. Do with it as you will. I’m not perfect! I have my sins like everyone else. I generally speak or write in fluent pagan or profandi and I have a bad addiction to porn, which could damage a relationship, if I let it. You can just take this as a bashing and we can start exchanging rant or you can just take it as friendly intent. You my think that I’m a hypocrite? People love to use that as a reason not to listen. Even a hypocrite has knowledge, even the learned do what they know they should not. It does not mean that what they have to say is not true. For example a parent/grandparent tells a small child not to smoke, yet does so him/herself. The child in question takes the "practice what you preach" attitude and uses it as an excuse to ignore the sound advise. The kid starts smoking, gets addicted and develops cancer later on in years. The advice was sound, the person giving it was flawed. The consequences don’t care what’s being preached; the consequences care about who is listening and taking heed

• kelly said on Jul 07, 2007....

  "It says that she was possessed by seven demons not that she was a woman of questionable reputation."
  
  
  Oh, it was only possession by seven demons?  Well, that's a relief, 'cause having a questionable reputation sounds much worse.

• StupidGenius said on Jul 07, 2007....

  ThePainfulTruthBFTW

  Ok, im afraid you are wrong in many of your above statements. I will go through them one at a time so that you may understand the error of your ways ;)

  1. The word dinosaur comes from the greek words meaning "Terrible Lizard".
  2. The definition of "Tanniyn" is a dragon, serpent or sea monster. The bible is not in anyway shape or form a reliable text for which to prove the existance of dinosaurs. You cut and past your argument from http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/dinos.shtml.
  3. It is scientific fact that Dinosaurs and humans did not co-exist nor did the bible write about dinosaurs. The earliest of man would have most likely reacted to a large animal such as a whale or an elephant as a monster the same way that a child is scared of something that is bigger than he/she is beacuse the child does not understand what it is thay they are looking at and therefor find it terifying.
  4. All religiouse fundamentalists deny carbon dating but there is one fact that can not be denied. Millions of fossils discovered over long periods of time that lay in thousands of museum cases around the world. They can be dated as older or newer than other fossile simply by looking at whether they lay higher or lower in the ground much the same way as rocks can be dated depending on at what depth they sit in the ground when discovered.
  5. From the 1830s onward, geologists noted how fossils, then came simple sea creatures, then more complex ones like sea fishes, then came life on land, then reptiles, then mammals, and finaly humans. Clearly this indicates beyond doubt "Natural Selection" and Evolution and there is clearly somew form of progression.
  6. When you say "The bible states" it has no meaning because the bible states many different things including many contradictions. The bible is not a reliable or factual basis for an argument.
  7. The bible is not supported by fact and so is dismissed as a form of truth or fact when the argument for the existance of god raises its ugly head.

  Yor last point is pure madness. You are suggesting that to believe in god is a safer bet than not believing in god. You are literally saying "I believe in god because if it all turns out to be true then ill be saved" That is rediculous.

  You should question everything and not just wrap yourself in a safty blanket (Lets call it Faith) that you think will protect you just in case god realy does exist. do not draw your arguments from websites that have a biased religious viewpoint. Draw them from fact that can be proven.

  You may delete this post if you wish but i would prefer a reply.

  SG

   

• dreaming_reality said on Jul 07, 2007....

  ..and she also washed His feet! she was no prostitute.
   
  Dino's?
  and God said "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: living stock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.........
  And God saw that it was good.
   
  on the sixth day God created the land with animals AND Man!! there is NO link between that and dinos!
   
  would it really matter if there was dinos or aliens or whatever?
  you can believe in God or don't. True, just because you 'belive' that there is a God does not mean your going to heaven. The fact is (according to MY bible), to put in words to understand, is that it not about knowing there is a God, it's about knowing Him, believing in Him, and How you apply what God's word to yourself.
  It's not the so-called- religion, it how you believe it.
   
  fact: 'Whoever' did find some funny looking bones, and filmes plates flying in the sky. But is it true? and if it was, how would it matter to your life?
  whether or not it is true, i do know for sure, that we all have hope, faith, and we all pray in one way or the other. doesn't that tell you something? other wise, we might just lose ourself in our sanity. What else would we have to hope for if that hope wasn't even real, but just another person adding to his research that hope is not a feeling but merly in the mind?
  i think this is all cover up, hidding our apprehensivness with ourselves under a matter-of-factness and undemonstrative reserve.
   
  all in all, we should just start by believing in something higher. and for me that's jesus.

• StupidGenius said on Jul 07, 2007....

  So you believe in god because you are afraid of even imagining what it means if it is not true. I pity you. You would have no idea about the delusion that is god if someone had not written about it in the bible. Stop using blind faith as a safety blanket for your life and start to look for truth backed up by fact not fiction. SG

• ThePainfulTruthBFTW said on Jul 07, 2007....

  Thanks for pointing out that I am wrong and pointing out the error of my ways by saying nothing but "your wrong" and "others think." I stand truly corrected now. If only you would have just told me I would not have spent so much time looking shit up for myself.

  1. The word dinosaur comes from the Greek words meaning "Terrible Lizard". True and its translation into the Hebrew would be Tanniyn. Are you trying to say that a terrible lizard would only be a big ass Blue Tail Racer and not what some may call a dragon.
  2. That’s your opinion. You dismiss it because it is a Christian point of view. I know where I got my "research" from, I did it and it’s not my only source of information. The information in there is sound. Don’t try to belittle me because it came from a "site" or someone other than you. That is still more than just pulling it out of my ass or from The Book of First Opinion. That information explained carbon dating and it’s flaws and below you state nothing to refute it. It’s accurate and not my only source of information and it states a TRUTH. Thanks for posting the link so others can research.
  3. What? Then why is there a specific name "Tanniyn" for dragon, serpent or sea monster as you agreed? Science can not prove that man and Dinosaurs did not co exist. The statement that "the earliest of man would have most likely reacted to a large animal such as a whale or an elephant as a monster the same way that a child is scared of something that is bigger than he/she is because the child does not understand what it is thay they are looking at and therefor find it terifying" is stupid. Give them more credit than that. Are you saying that thousands of years from now people looking back on us will think the same of us. Behemoth and Leviathan in the bible are specific creatures whose description matches that of a Dinosaur. Refer to Job chapter 41, Psalms 104, and Isaiah 27. I think that they understood exactly what they were looking at.
  4. Religious fundamentalists deny carbon dating because it is flawed. Scientist know this and will admit it (I live with one) if cornered. But some continue to push this crap simply because they want to deny that there is a higher power. As for the fossils and dating them according whether they lay higher or lower in the ground is a theoretical method also. No proof that it is accurate, but it works for you because you probably deny the account of the great flood. Again how convenient. Deny one thing to make something else fit your belief.
  5. It’s not proven…it’s speculation. It’s what they and you want to believe and many have recanted the BS theories they came up with. Where is that missing link by the way? It can’t be found because it does not exist. As dreaming realty quoted "let the land produce living creatures according to "their" kind. That seems to be holding truer than your evolution crap.
  6. Name a contradiction and please use something that you have read and not something you have heard. You still haven’t given me any facts, just assumptions. Again this is your opinion. Can you disprove the biblical account? There is more archeological evidence to support the bible than your natural selection/evolution theories.

  There is nothing mad about my statement. It is safer and what I believe. Why gamble with my soul? That would be madness and like I said I tend to be a better person if I believe. You stated that I should question everything and not just wrap myself in a safty blanket (Lets call it Faith) that you think will protect you just in case god really does exist. Do not draw your arguments from websites that have a biased religious viewpoint. Draw them from fact that can be proven. I could say that you have done the same thing. Your biased, you have no proof, and you get your information from idiots who have even rejected their own crap…amazing. I know plenty of scientist/former evolutionists who now believe in one true God and Creator.

  dreaming realty…Genesis 1: 20 And God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the sky." 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth." 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.

  24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

  26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

  There is NO link between that and dinos? Are dinos not creatures?

• StupidGenius said on Jul 08, 2007....

  Ok here we go again.
   
  Science is an evolutionary process in itself because it simply dosnt believe something until it is proven unlike religion. Its like two kids in a classroom, one uses the same text book for 5 years (The bible) and the other uses a text book that is updated every 6 months (Science).
   
  1. "Terrible Lizard is the literal translation. If the ancient civilisations new what a dinosaur was then they wouldnt have used a word that described a lizzard. We can get into translation if you like but I feel there are more pressing questions
  2. I didnt cover Carbon Dating because your agument was fundamentaly flawed. Scientists accept that carbon dating is not suitable for dating dinosaurs and thats why the process "Has Never been Used to Date a Dinosaur...Ever" In its defence it is used by murder investigations and is a sound and scientificaly proven process which will give acurate dates for time and date of death.
  3. The way in which the earth is dated uses a process such as a IPb/Pb isochron age. It is a complex dating system that works and is used to date fosilised dinosaur bones.
  4. Fundamentalist christians deny carbon dating because it is proven not to be able to date dinosaurs. But as I have pointed out. It is Not used for this purpose which reneders your argument on carbon dating irrelevent to this discussion.
  5. The missing link? We discover fossils that solve areas of the missing link all the time. There is no one missing link. Here is an example of a discovery that solves a part of the variouse missing links.

     "Palaeontologists have said that the find, a crocodile-like animal called the Tiktaalik roseae and described today in the journal Nature, could become an icon of evolution in action - like Archaeopteryx, the famous fossil that bridged the gap between reptiles and birds. Tiktaalik - the name means "a large, shallow-water fish" in the Inuit language Inuktikuk - shows that the evolution of animals from living in water to living on land happened gradually, with fish first living in shallow water.

  6. Here is one simple contradiction. Read the bible if you are going to test my knowledge of scripture. 

   

  ISA 14:21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; That they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.

  DEU 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

  In summary, your carbon dating arguments is flawed as it is not a true reflection of how scientists date fossilised dinosaur bones. Your arguments on scripture are flawed, see above quote. Science is about constantly proving and disproving theory until the theory becomes fact. We do not rely on one single text book, we update our theories constantly and factualy.

  SG

   

• ThePainfulTruthBFTW said on Jul 09, 2007....

  Yep, here we go again.

  Science changes it’s views because it finds that it is wrong, used the wrong process, or that it was busted in a flat out lie put out by those who want to push their own agenda. The Bible (not religion) does not do that.

  1. It’s a waste of time with you anyway.
  2. Carbon dating is not used since scientist tried it at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and did not get the results that corresponded with their preconceptions of "millions of years" so they stopped. They tried various other methods and got various results.
  3. Not getting into more of your so called exact science. Don’t have the time. See above.
  4. Fundamentalist Christians deny carbon dating because when using this method scientist must assume to know that the rate at which carbon-14 decays into nitrogen-14 hasn't somehow changed throughout the unobservable past. Scientist must also assume to know what the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 was in the environment in which the specimen lived during its lifetime. And finally, they must assume that there hasn't been any contamination in the specimen that they are attempting to date.
  5. Archaeopteryx was found to be a fraud. The same is true of Piltdown Man, Java Man, Nebraska Man, and Orce Man. Look them up. Here is a more recent backpedal on the evolutionist "theory" and evidence of mixing and matching specimens to make something up that never existed.

  In stark contrast to their sensationalistic ‘Feathers for T. rex’ article, National Geographic printed a brief, yet revealing statement by Xu Xing, vertebrate paleontologist from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in Beijing. Xu's revelation appears in the somewhat obscure Forum section of the March, 2000 issue, together with a carefully crafted editorial response. The letter from Xu Xing, vertebrate paleontologist from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, reads:

  "After observing a new feathered dromaeosaur specimen in a private collection and comparing it with the fossil known as Archaeoraptor [pages 100–101], I have concluded that Archaeoraptor is a composite. The tail portions of the two fossils are identical, but other elements of the new specimen are very different from Archaeoraptor, in fact more closely resembling Sinornithosaurus. Though I do not want to believe it, Archaeoraptor appears to be composed of a dromaeosaur tail and a bird body."

  National Geographic followed the letter from Xu with this statement:

  ‘Xu Xing is one of the scientists who originally examined Archaeoraptor. As we go to press, researchers in the U.S. report that CT scans of the fossil seem to confirm the observations cited in his letter. Results of the Society-funded examination of Archaeoraptor and details of new techniques that revealed anomalies in the fossil’s reconstruction will be published as soon as the studies are completed.

  So no, we do not discover fossils that solve areas of the missing link all the time as you stated. You see what you want to see or you make it. "Can you hand me that wing please? I need it to finish this!"

  6.Wrong again! Pay attention when you read something or at least know what the book is about.

  ISA 14:21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; That they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.

  DEU 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

  Deuteronomy is a book containing law to govern judgements given unto one man from another, Isaiah is a book of prophecy. Deuteronomy is basically saying that it is unjust to make a son suffer punishment for a crime committed by his father. Isaiah is describing that if sinners do not turn from sinful ways they will suffer. ISA 14:21 is taken from an account of the fate of Babylon. Isaiah describes how the continuing sins of generations in that city have so accumulated that God had to destroy the occupants "lest they rise and possess the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants"(verse 21).

  But you probably welcome anarchy don’t you?

  .

  There is no contradiction because God is not strictly speaking punishing sinless people in Babylon, rather he is punishing those that continue in sin.

  It is sad how desperately you want to push your bullshit. First off my post was not even about this. It wasn’t even about whom is and who is not a Saint. You just jumped in and respond to what you think you heard. Typical! Then when debated on your post on a legitament topic you accuse me of deleting your response on my blog and using more than one screen name (also typical). You are a sad case, no better than the others who plant evidence, mix and match evidence to create new truths and flat out lie to lead people astray. You do this simply to deny the existence of God or the Christ. You are a form of "Anti Christ" yourself. That in its self is more evidence that what the Bible states is true. You prove it so. I know what you are and what your intentions are and you do not (can not) deceive me. You have a blog, use it to spew your bullshit. Don’t try to manipulate mine. I would have gotten to this topic soon enough. When I do you are more than welcome to chime in but until then please shut the fuck up! Your two cents is one thing, but the whole damn dollar is another.

  TPT

• StupidGenius said on Jul 10, 2007....

  LOL.... desperation is a sign of a lost argument and you are definatly desperate.

  I dont mind being called the anti-christ because christ dosnt mean anything to me and know it to be a delusion and that is the truth. You bang on about carbon dating and concede that it is not used for dating dinosaurs but no comment on the acrual method that I made clear to you. This is an example of you taking what you feel like you can argue against and disregarding the points that you obviously looked up and found to be correct. Selective is the perfect way to describe you debating method.

  Typical bible basher... No fact, lots of fiction and you feel hurt when someone questions your god even though you deny the existance of thousands of different gods that were written about thousands of years before yours was even thought of. You just simply claim that your god is the true god and everyone else is wrong.

  You are arrogant and misslead by your own ignorance like a lamb to the slaughter.

  I do not need to resort to swearing etc. I produce fact and you replace it with fiction as an argument against it.

  When you die and god is not there to hold your hand I would love to be standing next to you so I could say.... "Told you so!"

   

   

   

   

   

• StupidGenius said on Jul 10, 2007....

  Top Ten Signs You're a Fundamentalist Christian

   

  
  10 - You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.
   
  9 - You feel insulted and "dehumanized" when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms, but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that we were created from dirt.
   
  8 - You laugh at polytheists, but you have no problem believing in a Triune God.
   
  7 - Your face turns purple when you hear of the "atrocities" attributed to Allah, but you don't even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the babies of Egypt in "Exodus" and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in "Joshua" including women, children, and trees!
   
  6 - You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods sleeping with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god who got killed, came back to life and then ascended into the sky.
   
  5 - You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of Earth (few billion years), but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is a few generations old.
   
  4 - You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs -- though excluding those in all rival sects - will spend Eternity in an infinite Hell of Suffering.  And yet consider your religion the most "tolerant" and "loving."

  
  3 - While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in "tongues" may be all the evidence you need to "prove" Christianity.
   
  2 - You define 0.01% as a "high success rate" when it comes to answered prayers.  You consider that to be evidence that prayer works.  And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God.
   
  1 - You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself a Christian.

• dreaming_reality said on Jul 10, 2007....

  SG...
  If you don't believe in any kind of higher power, but believe in your own so-called-scientific evolution, then believe it all you want. It only 'proves' that a person like you has NO feelings at all. Can you 'prove' emotion, why we have them, and where it comes from? Science may use all these materials to find and prove certain things, but guess where the material comes from? But then again, you don't believe that, so maybe your some kind of robot or the tin man.
  But since you like making lists:
   
  1. The Bible mentions only a variety of animals, not the whole thing.
   
  2. You don't belive in God, or any other god, because your afraid that all this time, you just might be wrong. So it makes science look bad!
   
  3. How God created man and provided for him is a supernatural creation of the universe and indicating of how the universe was not always here.
   
  4. The Bibles main purpose, is to tell us about God, not to list every animal God created.
   
  5. YOUR SCIENCES' big question is, "If dinos and cave men are real, why didn't the bible tell us about them?" We are showing you proof in the bible, but you don't want to belive it, because the Bible comes from a God that you obviously fear.
   
  6. You say that the Bible is not a reliable or factual basis for an argument. The gap theory is only in the mysteries of that on which only God would reveal.
   
  7. Read the Bible more often and put the pieces together! Your a man of science, and I thought scientists don't stop searching untill their proof is found.
   
  8. Here is a start- a. Count the days from the time of Adam untill the flood. Then the days after the flood to Jesus Christ. This tells you how old the earth is.
                                b. Israelites lived in caves, Kind David, and so on..
   
  9. There is no consequence in believing in one true God and believing His way is right and true.
   
  10. For us believers, yes, it fascinates us about dino's, but it has no effect upon our practical lives.
   
  11. When the bible says "God Created", people like you attack it with teachings of evolution and its big bang theory. (I will pray for you)
   
  12. Science discredits every supernatural account, but credits God's Word to be the word of mere men.
   
  13. Like us, you only believe in evolution because your teacher tells you so.
   
  14. The Hebrew meaning of Adam is "red dirt"
   
  15. 'God Said' He created all life about 6,000 years ago and that there were dinosaur-like creatures.
   
  16. 'Man Said' thats foolishness, the dinosaurs are over millions and millions of years old because fossil said so.
   
  17. God bless you.
   
  PainfulTruth...
   
  My bad, i was talking about us and Apes. Their is no link between us and apes.
  Dino's are creatures. The link? Is that cave men are just men who lived in caves! LOL

• StupidGenius said on Jul 10, 2007....

  Dreaming Reality
   
  That was proberbly the funniest comment I have ever read. Whats even more laughable is that you actualy believe it. Your argument is flawed and ridiculous in so many places that I dont knwo where to start... I know I'll make a list LOL.
   
  1. Who said that the bible dosnt mention a variety of animals? not me. So not sure where you read that. Read my comments again please.
  2. I believe in science because it relies on provable fact not fiction and is based on evidence not "Blind Faith".
  3. God is a delusional state induced by your need to feel part of a collective group who share the same delusion.
  4. The bible is so ridiculous in its contradictions and garbled message that its funny. It is a collection of storys created, edited and spread by man. No evidence whatsoever indicates that a "God" had anything to do with it.
  5. You have outdone yourself with this stoke of idiocy. Sciences "Big Question" you know nothing of science so I can only assume you are an ill educated sheep following blindly the words of other sheep.
  6. Typical religiouse escapism. Just because you cant explain something dosnt mean "God" did it. Science is what keeps you alive when you go to the hospital or should doctors just leave you laying on a bed in the hope that god will cure you. LOL
  7. I have read the bible. I also understand the bible. Its my strength and ability to question that makes me different from religion infatuated sheep like you.
  8. Get real, you obviously dont read or study or anything. Im guessing you are very ill educated. The wrold is at least a few billion years old. It is proven fact. Instead of dismissing it, Deal with it.
  9. You are right, god dosnt exist so it dosnt matter wether you believe him or not. It only matters wether you are delusional or not. You clearly are.
  10. Dinosaurs are part of history. They dont effect your everyday life but neither does god but you still read about him all the time.
  11. I repeat, you are ill educated and do not understand science. If you did then you would be an aithiest. Dont waste your useless murmering in your "Gods ear" he is not listening to you he is busy giving some child in this world cancer or aids.
  12. FACT ALERT: The bible was written by men therefore it is the word of man. I suppose all the other religions through thousands of years that have worshipped a "God" are all wrong and your religion is the one true religion. LOL
  13. I believe in evolution because it is proven, not beyong doubt because new facts and theories are developed everyday but science is a progression in thought and understanding. We move forward while religion is stuck in the dark age.
  14. Not sure why you felt the need to tell me that but im sure in your delusional state it made sense.
  15. "God" didnt say any such thing as the bible was written by man. These men didnt mention dinosaurs they mentioned a "Terrible Lizard" that does not constitute a dinosaur by any stretch of the imagination.
  16. Fossils give us a good idea about the age of the earth. They are factual and more likely to give a true indication of fact than a book written by delusionists.
  17. He is not real. Thats it. End of story.

   

  Prove emotion? I can explain it but you would never understand and it would be a waste of time. When someone of more intelectual substance askes me that question then I will.

  How about you tell me why "God" alows inocent children to get aids, cancer etc and why he alows natural disasters to kill millions??

  I find it hilarious that you say because I believe in evolution "I have no feelings" You are actualy an embarrasment to your religion and faith because you know nothing about it or anything else of any consiquence. I beg you, Read more before you babble on any further about subjects you clearluy no nothing about.

  I have been smiling the whole time I have been writting this. You are very funny. I enjoyed your comments for their pure comedic value and nothing more.

• dreaming_reality said on Jul 11, 2007....

  SG..
  Thanks! I'd knew you'd laugh. That just proves to me that your pissed. I guess that's your security blanket, when people tell you about God. Don't get scared, and don't get mad. It's not like we're trying to convert you. You do know, that we make our own choices right? That's free will for you.
  You think I'm ill educated and delusional? Well I'd rather be all of that, than to bend down and worship science.
  Besides, I never said didn't like science. I'm just not an atheist. As a matter of fact, I have great respect for science. Heck, you guys do a good job on making things better, but also at the same time proving the prophesis right, when talking plagues, when it comes down to it.
  Why does God allow people to get cancer and aids? Were you not listening to yourself when you were quoting Isaiah 14:21?
  You say you read the bible and understand it, but everything else proves that you don't know it, and that you of course, being and ill educated man of the bible, you misinterpret the bible. You probably read some of it, and then, skipped through pages, because you didn't find the answers to your qusetions. You'll never find the answer in there if you don't even know where to look. Stop saying delusional, because you're ill delusional, I don't blame you. I mean it, I really don't blame you.
  You laugh and say we come from dirt. Haha...fact, Hebrew meaning for Adam is "red dirt"
  Try going to church, and actually staying. And I don't mean for one day, or the whole sermon, try it a little longer.
  I may not have 'memorized' God's scripture, but I do know the difference between God's word and an atheists'.
  And when you can't explain something, then how else would you explain 'it'? Stop using doctors for excuses, because God allowed it to happen. You know, it's called 'helping people'. Obviously, you don't know anything about God's doings and why he would allow such things. I already gave you a clue. No, actually you gave your self that, but you didn't realize it.
   I DARE YOU to read John 10:22-42
  You don't know what 'blind faith' even means. As matter of fact, God talks about 'blind faith' in the bible. That means you.
  Yes I am a sheep to be slaughtered because of the bible and God, and that again proves Gods' word to be right.
   

• kelly said on Jul 12, 2007....

  SG: That was a great list.  Did you author those or did you find the list somewhere?

• StupidGenius said on Jul 12, 2007....

  I found the list. Glad you liked it. SG

• ThePainfulTruthBFTW said on Jul 13, 2007....

  This is my final comment to SG regarding my post on Mary Magdalene and the rest of this stuff until I actually open it up for discussion on my blog. Sorry this has taken so long. I have other things to do.

  I stated that carbon dating it is not used "ANY LONGER" in argument to you saying that it never has been. Stop trying to put a SPIN on what is being said. It is just as bad as your outright lies. Of course no further comments on the subject because it is a waste of time with you. If you want to mention not commenting onsomething I noticed that there was no rebuttal on your Archaeopteryx (or ISA14:21 and DEU 24:16) argument that got crushed like the fake fossil it is. How typical of you to have no comeback yet go on and on with your opinion. "Desperation IS a sign of a lost argument." Yes I did research; yes I used things that I found to be correct. Why would I use information that was false or just pull stuff from my hind end? That is your thing.

  As for denying the existence of thousands of different gods, I believe that they were false gods. If anything they were fallen Angeles and their offspring. Refer to what lidstrom82 wrote in your blog. If you look at the ancient religions of the world you would see many commonalties. Why do you think that is?

  As for my swearing…Waaa! You came to my blog. If you don’t like it debate someone else. There are plenty of warm fuzzy people out there, but I’m not one of them. Sure some respond to gentle correction and others need something sterner. I’m something sterner. When you read my blog here (obviously didn’t) and saw the word crap you should have figured that I was capable of far worse. Look at my style STUPID, could you not figure it out?

  I have come to the conclusion that you are content to remain in your ignorance therefor I’m done with you until I bring a topic up that is for non-believers too. This was for believers that have been misled. Not for your non-believing ass to spew your BS.

  I’ll close with this. I think that you are a so-called genius. You were probably labeled as such as a child and some may have called you gifted. Your Mommy probably called you her "smart little man" and teachers praised you. All you heard was how smart you were and then you began to tell others of how smart you are if they did not figure it out and tell you so them selves. It’s apparent that you began to think yourself superior. You were probably obnoxious with your declarations of "I’m a genius, I’m smarter than others are, I’m two grades ahead of you." Though you may have a natural or high capacity of intellect, a high IQ…your word is not the gospel truth. Just because you say something does not make it so. You need to get over yourself because you’re not the best thing since sliced bread. If you were so friggin smart you would have figured that this was not the time to put your natural selection two cent in. Pay attention or shut up.

  By the way you’re banned until I open the topic to your brand of CRAP. Did you see it that time? Dreaming reality and lidstrom82 and I pointed out many things. They are kinder and gentler then I. They tried their way, I tried mine and even though you don’t have a leg to stand on you keep going. There is no need to go on with people like you. The light is red, the light is red…HEY THE LIGHHT IS RED! Go on and cross then, it’s your life.

  There is no need to post on your blog that I couldn’t handle you and blocked you. I’ll post this on your site to explain. You can cop out and delete it if you want, but I would appreciate you telling the truth.

  TPT

Comment on "ThePainfulTruth: Mary Magdalene Was Not A Prostitute!"

Currently tagged	religion gripe bitch Saints bad rap (Click to add tags below)
Tag this post	(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Your comment
	Comment Anonymously