So now let’s go a little deeper…

Here’s one way to look at it; a way that will not contradict the laws of nature (which, unfortunately Christianity has a habit of doing) but will in fact uphold the example of it: in the physical, it is impossible to stop being the offspring of your father.  Genetically, you are forever a child of both your father and mother. Noting can change that, not even death!  If you take bone marrow samples from deceased family members, the higher percentage of an identical DNA pattern will more than likely exist between the nucleus family, i. e. father, mother, daughter and son.

True to form, I am my father’s first born son.  I favor him, my dimensions are similar to him and sometimes, I even laugh like him! I think like him and I now know from many conversations, where my temper stems from.  If you have seen me then you have seen my father. Not at any time can I remove the blood of my father from my veins, or the genetic code imprinted into my DNA which shows on even the minutest, invisible levels that I am his direct offspring.  But it is possible to not know your father, to not have been in his presence and to be ignorant of his ways.  But if I know me, then I got an idea of who he could be.  Not with every person this is the case but as a rule on an invisible level/genetically it is irrefutable   

So why then are we told to believe in a naturally impossible thing such as the fall of man?  The Bible makes it very plain that because of sin, ushered in by Adam, we ceased to be the children of the Most High.  We became like some kind of… mutant, capable of anything and everything but His “Holy” (which in His case, is relative) behavior.  This is where the need of Jesus comes into play, if we humor this biblical train of thought.  Man didn’t need a teacher; he (it) needed a Savior.  We lost our privilege of being God’s children!  But in nature again, this is not possible.

But what if I still am the limited expression of the Absolute? The five figure/five figured=rayed star of the Abstract?  Well I think, I reason and create but more importantly I don’t think in terms of those labels because when I do those things I am not thinking in terms of the definition of my actions, I’m just being me.  What if my only “Satan”=deceiver is my inner ignorance of my true nature.  And that to become more aware would unlock the nature of the Absolute?  But I would need a teacher or at least a certain method of learning to expound on this Divine nature.  But even Jesus said that we would not have need of one because the Holy Spirit would instruct us in all things. For what reason then would I have need of a teacher like Jesus?  I would only need to know myself.  And not a negative one sided one but a holistic, all inclusive picture.  Much like that of my Father, the Absolute.  All that I am capable of, both what I have been conditioned to believe what is my good side and my evil side.  Cause even Jesus cursed the life of the fig tree.  And finally: what if I was able to transcend into the mastery of this perception.  What then would I be?  I am in the process of becoming and have yet to fully obtain it but I know that I will become like the example of the scriptural Jesus; I would have conquered the manacles of this material realm by the power of my Father who is in me because He and I are ONE and the same.  If you have seen me then you would have seen my father.

Again, what is the purpose of an immutable promise of sonship if it can be so easily taken away by one fleshly man?