CreativeWoman's tags:
Who's reading CreativeWoman (614):
60-YEAR-OLD NEW JERSEY WOMAN BECOMES OLDEST IN U.S. TO GIVE BIRTH TO TWINS

**Watch FOX News Channel or go to http://foxnews.com for  more                                                                        

I don't know if she is a grandma, but she certainly could be. My first reaction to this is that it isn't fair to the children to have a child at such an advanced age.  I'm sure she loves them, but at her age how long will she be there for them?

What do you think about having children in your golden years?

CW

http://www.magickidsusa.com  Use Discount Referral Code MK31577 for closeout savings on quality kidswear!

agloco




del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • sweet_cookie01 said on May 24, 2007....
    if i am at that age i dont think i would want to go through the difficulty of pregnancy...LOL...
  • queenparanoia said on May 24, 2007....
    wow... that's all i could say!! and does she breast feed?? LOL!!!
  • secretlife said on May 24, 2007....

    interesting that this woman is a psychologist and her husband a lawyer-  they had the in-vitro done in south africa.  she has 3 other children, ages 33,29, and 6.  she wanted her son to have siblings his own age.

    I don't really see much wrong with this.  i don't think your average everyday woman wants to be bearing children at 60.  i don't see this becoming a trend.  but i guess i don't see anything wrong in it.

  • allaroundgirl said on May 24, 2007....
    I guess everyone knows how much they can handle.
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    sweet,
    I'm not sure I would either.  She must really love children.

    queen,
    I don't know that detail. :-)

    secret,
    Children are a blessing at any age.  I guess the older children will be there for the younger ones as time goes by. 

    My grandmother was 45 when she had my mom and then died when my mom was 20.   I guess that clouds my thinking.

    allaroundgirl,
    You make a very good point.  It sounds like they did it with the six year old in mind, as secret pointed out.  :-)

    CW
  • silverwhisper said on May 24, 2007....
    wait a sec--she hasn't gone through menopause?!

    ed
  • botoni said on May 24, 2007....
    I m in that grandpa age range. I cannot imagine having babies 24hours a day at this age. Love them or not they are likely going to be parentless at a very early age. They have older siblings now who very probably wil end up raising them to maturity. Considering the careers that both parents have it is likely that thy cna afford plenty of house help to do the essential chores but wow what a load! Good luck to them but I m glad its not me.
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    ed,
    One would think she had, but I don't know for sure.  I wonder how expensive it was to conceive these twins?

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    botoni,
    That's my point.  As a parent that age you wouldn't be around to guide them through life.  I find it kind of sad for the babies.

    CW
  • AlisonMarie19 said on May 24, 2007....
    Two words: "That's insane!!"
     
    Sorry, our bodies were not meant to do THAT at THAT stage of life. She was probably chemically fertile. She was most likely post menopausal, but they chemically altered her to be able to have these kids.
     
    Wrong, wrong, wrong!!! I don't get it!! At ALL!!
     
                  =(^-^)=   ali m.
  • skald said on May 24, 2007....
    I don't think it is a good thing to have babies at 60. 
  • the_infernal_optimist said on May 24, 2007....
    I think it is irresponsible to have children (at least through rather extreme medical intervention) at such a late age. To me, I have a responsibility to be there for any offspring I have, in every capacity I can be, at least into their adulthood. And while yes, I might die tomorrow in a car accident, I can at least reasonably expect to be around for my children for the next 20+ years.

    She might survive beyond the average life expectancy for her state/area, but it's more likely that she will perish before her kids are 18-20. That seems a little early to lose a parent, IMO, and I don't see why you'd almost set your kids up for that early loss. They deserve to reasonably expect their parents to be there for them.

    I'm all for women having as close to their ideal family as possible, within reason and with regard to repercussions for their kids. For example, I would LOVE to have four or five kids (um, no more pregnancies though, thanks - adoption works!), but finances dictate that two is our max, at least for the foreseeable future. I suppose I could give birth to more babies, but it would be irresponsible (just IMO) to bring them into a family not well-prepared for the financial needs of a larger family. I won't do it until/unless I feel that we can give them everything they need and deserve.

    Does that makes sense?

    ~Infernal
  • Eilan said on May 24, 2007....
    I'm with SL.  I don't see this becoming trendy.  A lot of 60-year old women don't have the financial means to undergo fertility treatments, (I believe that this woman had in-vitro done at a South African clinic that specializes in helping older mothers--I don't imagine that it's cheap), nor do they have the desire to do so.  My mother is 60, and I know that she'd never consider something like this, particularly now that she's old enough to retire if she wants!

    However, this woman has a longer life expectancy than a lot of women 100 or so years ago, who often had babies when they were well into their forties and then died relatively young (at least by our standards).  It's possible that she could live into her 90's.

    I saw a pic of the woman--she looks pretty good for a 60-year-old!
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    Ali,
    I agree.  Although the babies are a blessing, it sets your older children up the be parents to their siblings when you pass.

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    skald,
    I suppose she would have had to have been in perfect health to even attempt childbirth at her age.  I still think it would have been hard on her and potentially the babies.

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    Infernal,
    It makes perfect sense to me.  You bring up some good points.  It does sound the finally is financially well off.  I just find it hard to overlook the advanced age of the mother.

    CW
  • sweetsoul said on May 24, 2007....

    I'm not 60 yet, but close enough for this discussion, and trust me I'm VERY glad it's my daughter-in-law who is currently in the hospital working on delivering my grandchild.

    Colour me very happy my parents were very young when they had me. All my friends' parents were closer to my grandparents' ages. Of course there's a price to pay for having your children you but I can't ever see having children that late in life.

  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    Eilan,
    My mother is 62.  She would laugh in my face if I suggested she have another child.  She finds it hard enough to keep up with my sister's 14 year old.  I hope you are right and it doesn't become a trend.

    CW
  • Holly-Go-Lightly said on May 24, 2007....

    I have been a mom for many years now. I had my first when I was only 19.

    Then, I became a grandma while still in my thirties, and even now, when

    someone suggests "you can still have children" (and even though I adore

    kids), I figure once I'm a grandma "Nana" as she calls me, I'm done having any more.

    My future years will be for me--after all the years of taking care of and raising a good family, now, soon it will be "me time"--I can't imagine all the possibilities!!

    But, re: this article, I think it is selfish to have a child as late in life as this. You all are right--it probably won't have its mom around for long, and even if she lives another 20+ years, these are usually the downhill years, healthwise and energy wise.

    Ridiculous!!

  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    sweetsoul,
    Congratulations on the new grandbaby!

    My parents were young when they had me.  They don't seem to have regrets.

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 24, 2007....
    Holly,
    It's all about quality of life.  Will the parents even be in good enough health to even enjoy the children once they are in elementary school?  It sure makes me wonder.  I'm sure they love them, but I find it hard to understand this choice this late in life for them.

    Are you having fun being a young grandma?  I have two cousins that are younger grandmas and they adore it.

    CW
  • Holly-Go-Lightly said on May 24, 2007....

    *CW*--just as I would never trade being such a young mom, I would never trade being a young Nana either!! I love it, I absolutely love it. I am a total kid person, I raised mine on my own, I was a teacher's aide, I ran a home daycare, I was leader of several youth programs, and just enjoyed everything about participating in their young lives. If I would have been married, I probably would have had more than 3, but 3 on your own is like 6 without a partner!!  LOL

    The funniest part is when people find out I'm a grandma--its hilarious!! No one ever believes it!! (guess that's good for my ego). When I take her someplace, eveyone just automatically thinks she's mine  LOL (maybe your cousins have experienced this as well).

    Lately though, her mother, my (ahem) daughter has a giant redwood stuck up her butt and has decided that she's never going to speak to me again, and just for that little extra dig, she says I'll never see the baby for the rest of my life (which is just about the most hurtful thing she could've done, which is why she did it).

    I'm rambling again--so sorry

    *Holly*

  • botoni said on May 24, 2007....
    Holly......I m so sorry about the conflict with your daughter. I hope that resolves soon. You deserve to enjoy your granddaughter every minute possible. Hope that gant redwood gets chopped down soon!
  • Lioness said on May 25, 2007....
    I wouldn't want to have a baby at that age any longer CW, it's the time when I would need care myself! 
  • CreativeWoman said on May 25, 2007....
    Holly,
    I hope your daughter comes around soon.  I can tell you really love your grandbaby.

    Don't worry about rambling.  I do it all the time.  :-)

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 25, 2007....
    botoni,
    I think a woodchipper is in order to help Holly out.  I agree that family is very important.

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 25, 2007....
    Lioness,
    I agree.  It doesn't seem natural to me.

    CW
  • sweetsoul said on May 25, 2007....
    CW thanks for the congrats but she's not here quite yet. They're still working on it...should be some time today...unless my son is letting me sleep and plans to call before I go to work. Call me excited.
  • Trinov said on May 25, 2007....
    I think that everyone is an individual, and some people, like me, are very tired  in their sixties, but some people are not.
     
    I have friends who as grandmothers love the grandchildren but can't take them more than a few days at a time, and a friend with many children and more than a dozen grandchildren who is happy to have everybody in her house for the summer, and that is a day camp at least. (But she was bored raising her eighth baby, managing a business, playing bridge and being in a country new to her, she needed something else to do-- she was a powerhouse).
     
    And there are families who live longer, and I believe that everyone will be living longer. Take out some pictures of your grandparents at say age 35, and pictures of your parents, and of yourselves. Does 35 now look as old as 35 back then?
     
    I had an aunt who lived to 103, when she was 90 she was still driving her car and being as active as anyone 60 years younger. Of course she was someone who was very energetic all her life, and was taking care of her great-grandchildren when needed. So I would just wish anyone who has children at 60 lots of energy and patience, and a good long life.
  • kingcobra said on May 25, 2007....
    shoot her!!!!!
  • Holly-Go-Lightly said on May 25, 2007....

    *botoni* & *CW* ~

    thank you for the kind (& hilarious!!) words.(I'll let you know where to send the woodchipper!!)

    yes, she is the light of my life!

    I always like to hear from you both~thanks again

    *Trinov* ~ I totally agree with your comment about the differences between 35 then, and 35 now. My parents had me when they were very young, so they looked always youthful, even in pictures. However, I look back at pictures of one of my Grandmothers and think, my god, she was probably 45 or so, and she always looked OLD, even then!!

    **Holly**

  • CreativeWoman said on May 26, 2007....
    sweetsoul,
    I would be excited too.  What a wonderful blessing!

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 26, 2007....
    Trinov,
    I have heard it said that 40 is the new 30.  That is a good point.  I hope this woman has lots of energy for many years to come.

    CW


  • CreativeWoman said on May 26, 2007....
    KC,
    Perhaps with a water gun to snap her out of it!  :-)

    CW
  • CreativeWoman said on May 26, 2007....
    Holly,
    You are most welcome.  :-)

    CW
  • beyondtheveil said on May 26, 2007....
    CW- I don't mind she did this,  just can't imagine why she would want to.
     
    Of all the things that could happen to me, this would be near the bottom, after a mouthful of root canals. And twins no less.
  • CreativeWoman said on May 26, 2007....
    beyond,
    It's her choice.  I would never take that away from her.  I wonder the "why" as well.  It is supposedly to have a playmate for her 6 year old. She must have a lot of support from her older children. She's got her hands full.  :-)

    CW

Comment on "Grandmas having babies..."


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)