bloc's tags:
"

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is, without question, the single worst law enacted during the Bush presidency, and is one of the most destructive laws passed in the last several decades. It is not merely a bad law. It vests in the President the power to detain people indefinitely with no meaningful opportunity to contest the government's accusations. That is the very power the Founders sought first and foremost to prohibit.

More significantly, whether a country permits its political leaders to imprison people arbitrarily and with no process is one of the few defining attributes dividing free and civilized countries from lawless tyrannies. Or, as Thomas Jefferson put it in his 1789 letter to Thomas Paine: "I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." To vest the President with the power to imprison people indefinitely with no charges is fundamentally to transform the type of country we are."

Please read the full article by Glenn Greenwald

"It would be a profound -- and truly inexcusable -- abdication of Democrats' responsibilities for them to do anything other then devote full-scale efforts to restoring habeas corpus."

I couldn't agree more with this sentiment. I've said before that I'm not a democrat, yet I've been a strong support these past few years. This will be one of my big tests. If the democrats don't restore habeas I'll have to rethink my support of them.


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • bloc said on May 09, 2007....
    the full article is a must read. Here is another insightful quote

    "Americans understand instinctively that to allow someone to contest accusations against them is not tantamount to allowing them to go free."
  • silverwhisper said on May 09, 2007....
    what a bunch of useless cowards!

    ed
  • lioneljay said on May 09, 2007....
    It will be interesting to see how this plays out. The Bushies had the entire Democratic party running scared after 9/11 and the fallout is still settling down to earth.
  • muckpar said on May 09, 2007....
    I too am not a democrat (independent), but I strongly support their efforts to restore habeas corpus.  The act you refer to should be repealed.  I am disappointed the supreme court has let this law stand.  I didn't think Bush's two nominations would have had that much impact so soon.  If this thing is allowed to stand, we are in a sad way. 
  • sparks78 said on May 12, 2007....
    Let's stop and think a little bit here.

    The Republican leaning Supreme Court gives Bush anything he wants.

    Remember, they gave him the election victory in 2000.

    What should we expect the Supreme Court to do?

Comment on "The Democrats and Habeas Corpus"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

"Why is the Supreme Court's decision to uphold habeas corpus rights for the Guantanamo detainees so scary that Senator Lindsey Graham will "explore the possibility, if necessary, of a constitutional amendment to blunt the effect of this decision"?"...
that's who is in gitmo right? That's why it's OK to torture them right? Think again...
"Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C."...

Subscribe to the SoulCast Newsletter To Receive the Best Uncensored Blogs About Love, Sex, Relationships, God, Politics, and More.


Ever wonder what people really think and how they really live?

Read about the real lives of regular people like you whose powerful moving blogs will make you smile, cry, emotional, and warm inside.

Your FREE SoulCast newsletter is just moments away. Receive your first feel-good blog by entering your email address below.

First Name:
Your Email:


You can unsubscribe at any time with one click. We NEVER sell or share your email address with anyone. Period. close