agentPit's tags:
Who's reading agentPit (3):
You've no way to stop them. One way or the other, they will go for it to armed themselves with NUKE eventually post a threat to all, directly or indirectly.

I call for a UN reform allow any security council member nation to nuke them if any future terrorists attack that related to them that link to nuke regardless origin. Put them out of their misery en mass for long term humanity sake. Such  reinforcement measure will make those nation to think twice before nuke themselves.

I propose US begin to reinvent, renovate Nuke device to nano scale technology. Each will equivalent to 10X current power, and store it in the satellite outer orbit area set ready to launch in case of threat. One such cluster nukes could easily wipe out entire Iran or North Korea will force these insecure fundamentalists to refocus their energy and political gimmick to constructive way such as economy and welfare to their own people.


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • hunter_boyce_chandler said on Apr 16, 2007....
    I think I saw that movie.......
     
    btw there is another solution to the "War on Terror"
     
    1) leave them the hell alone.
    2) The US should pull out of Iraq and attack the House of Saud!
    3) Abandon Israel
     
    Most of the conflict is political anyways.  Let the Arab and Persian and Hindu and Jew all kill each other.
     
    If there is anybody left we should help them establish their own WalMart.
     
    HBC
  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    1.  They started it Hunter, no matter how you slice it they brought the US in.  You can make a halfway decent argument about Europe having started.  .  . no wait you can't because Rome owned much of that land prior to the Middle Easteners currently claiming the lnd.
     
    2.  Maybe.
     
    3. Abandon friends?  That's straight coward talk!
     
    The US hasn't built nano nukes yet on purpose.  (though they probably ave them in Area 51 if you believe that sort of thing.
  • hunter_boyce_chandler said on Apr 17, 2007....

    I dont know what a nano-nuke is.  There is a volumn threshold required for a fissionable material to begin a chain reaction.  A nano nuke would develope about as much power as a good fart.

    Since when is Israel my friend?  How much American Blood should we waste on someone who regularly bombs children.

    Israel is just as guilty of terrorism as the nations of Islam.  Israel is the one who invented it.  When Britain controlled Palestine it was the Jews who bombed buildings full of Americans, children and non-combatants.  They did this only because they thought Britain was not moving fast enough.  To pretend that Israel has no Blood or Guilt on their hands is to ignore reality.

    It was the House of Saud that bombed us on 9/11.  But our government and our President is too tied up in protecting the oil industry to do anything about it.

    HBC

  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Yeah there is a minimum, but it's no that high.  Some have a threshold of 60 lbs or less (much less) you could easily make one small enough to fit into say a large backpack or car.
     
    1. Regularly bombs children?  Wow, didn't catch up with the rest of the class on how Hezbollah puts their missiles in school yards giving Isreal terribly little choice and even then they manage to keep collateral to a minimum.
     
    2.  Isreal invented terrorism?  Once again I guess the Revolutionary War never happened.  Or for that matter any of a dozen other conflicts in which one side was so badly out numbered that they were unable to fight their enemy openly.
     
    3. Who said pretend Isreal is blameless?
     
    None of that matters.  Ally=Friend.  Isreal is your friend since your president said so and if you don't like that move.
     
     
  • hunter_boyce_chandler said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Wong,
    Sean.!!!!!!
     
    We do not live in the USSR.  The only nation that can say "Love it or Leave It" is Cuba.
     
    We live in a nation where it is our civic duty to voice our opinion especially when it is not shared by the President.  He is not a King, and not a dictator.
     
    I live in the south and see buttheads everyday displaying their confederate flags on their gun toting pick ups.  They have Race-Baiting bumperstickers.  They also have anti-abortion stickers, they have that silly Republican sticker that says Marriage equals one man and one woman.
     
    I don't agree with anything these guys believe, but I would never suggest that they move to another country.  I am not that ignorant.
     
    You really need to think a little bit about your positions before you post them.  You have come across as the anti-american who is against free speech.
     
    HBC
  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Only to an idiot do I come across as anti-american.   But just to prove you wrong you've earned the right to waste of my posts for the day.
  • hunter_boyce_chandler said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Sean
    Are we going to sink to name calling?
     
    Just because someone doesnt agree with your regurgitation of the silly plan by agentPit to put  nuclear weapons in space and drop them on Muslims.
     
    Muslims are not our enemy.  Muslims did not bomb us on 9/11. Muslims did not capture innocent people in Iraq and cut off their heads. 
     
    It was Saudi Nationals and some gangsters from Syria and Jordan that did these things. They just happen to by Muslim.
     
    Why are we not bombing Saudi Arabia ?(because rich American Oil Companies will not let us.?) 
     
    Why are we not bombing Syria? (because Israel doesn't want to stur them up?)
     
    Why are we not bombing Jordan? (because they are in our pocket?)
     
    We are fighting the wrong war.  Bush's war is designed to make American Companies rich.   We should own Saudi Arabia by now.
     
    HBC
  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Are we going to sink to name calling?  Uh you started it by calling me Anti-American. 
     
     
    Muslims are not our enemy.  Muslims did not bomb us on 9/11. Muslims did not capture innocent people in Iraq and cut off their heads.  
     
    They didn't?  Wait down there you say they did, I'm confused by your circle talk. 
     
    It was Saudi Nationals and some gangsters from Syria and Jordan that did these things. They just happen to by Muslim.
     
    Why are we not bombing Saudi Arabia ?(because rich American Oil Companies will not let us.?) 
     
    Even if this were true (which it isn't) this country is ruled by the dollar, deal with it.
     
    Why are we not bombing Syria? (because Israel doesn't want to stur them up?)
     
    You covred this, money.
     
    Why are we not bombing Jordan? (because they are in our pocket?)
     
    Would you attack anybody who was in your pocket?  What kind of sense would that make?
     
  • agentPit said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Hunter,

    I wasn't specifically targeted Muslim nor Islamic nation.
    Didn't I mentioned N.Korea?

     I knew it would initiate next round arm race among Russia, China, EU etc. But if we get a quantum leap and refuse to share on such technology, friend or not. The leap forward  will eventually halve those political gimmicks if not pressure those nuke ambitious nations think twice to arm themselves with virtually obsolete technology that will risk themselves into extinction (a complete wipe-out).

    p/s: nanoNuke isn't area 51 fiction  anymore if adequate funding provided in the research.
  • hunter_boyce_chandler said on Apr 17, 2007....

    Sean, 

    my friend. 

    Timmy McVey was Christian, does that mean christians bombed OK City?  of course not.

    agentPit,

    I understand you think your plan to have a ultra tiny nuclear bombs floating in space over everybody is workable.  I just don't think you are right.

    1) There is no such thing as a Nano Nuke. Nano means the mechanism is microscopic.  If there were Nano Nukes you would not be able to see them.  If they blew up it might make you itch.

    2) During the cold war with USSR the fear of Mutual Destruction was just one of many reasons we never let war escalate.  A new Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) plan run by the UN would be a disaster.  We can't trust them to swap oil for food, why would we trust them with bombs?

    HBC 

  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Did the rest of Christianity claim McVey?  Can you find a major Christian Leader who approves of bombing abortion centers?
     
    Does the nation of Islam as a whole denounce Iyattolah Khomeni?  Was there an out cry when a man was tried for converting to Christianity with his life in the balance?  Were death threats handed out over cartoons?
     
     
  • SeanRenaud said on Apr 17, 2007....
    Damn got cut off, again.
     
    1. Pit is talking sci-fi that goes against known physics laws.  You are 100% right.  What I was saying though is that we could build nukes ALOT smaller than we have to the point where new delivery techniques become feasible.
     
    2. I agree 100%

Comment on "Time to reform UN and allow qualified arab nation to nuke."

politics LOL just a thought war world crisis opinion (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Weak on foreign policy, sold out to the nutty left on domestic policy, now lets fuck with national security and have trials for terrorists in federal courts....
Every week, I delve into our local city entertainment/op-ed/newspaper....
He didn't even try to answer it. What would be your answer? Were we right in dropping the bombs on Japan?...
The only human being on the planet that can eject a huge turd, yet somehow dupe the media into thinking it's a golden egg that smells like roses....
How's Obama doing with the economy and his stimulus.......