The-Societal-Retard's tags:
The-Societal-Retard reads (1):
Who's reading The-Societal-Retard (0):
  • Currently, no one

How is it our National Economy is So Strong Yet Everyone’s Getting Poor? The Problem of Income Inequality’.

Right sided economists say the United States Economy is stronger than ever, while leftie politicians claim the economy is in terrible shape; the right wing politicians respond by saying American wages are continuing to climb as they have been and those on the left scream that right now incomes for average Americans are rapidly falling. So who’s right and who’s wrong here? Its simple, but not that simple.

Its true that the United States economy is strong, in fact its at one of one of its strongest points if not the strongest point in history. American wages on average have risen with economical growth, and those facts are undeniable.

So what’s up with those crybabies who say the economy is in bad shape, and why do they say the average American’s wages have been falling?

They’re correct; the American economy mirrors the economy right before we plunged into the Great Depression of the 1930’s. Most Americans have seen a significant drop in income over the last few years; for 90% of Americans making under the $104,000.00 that it takes to earning in the top 10% of all Americans, individual income has steadily fallen over 15% in the last three decades.

How can both sides be correct? What’s the deal?

The reason why: Income Distribution Inequality. Income Distribution is an often overlooked economic statistic that makes both sides be correct- if, that is, income distribution is terribly unequal. Income distribution is the statistic which calculates to what amount from the overall national income goes who and in what earning percentage; the wealthy, the middle class, or impoverished American workers. You may’ve heard it referred as of late as the income gap, and it’s the statistic being talked about when you hear about the spreading income gap between rich and poor.

Income Distribution Inequality refers to a phenomenon that’s been taking place over the last three decades in the U.S. While 90% of Americans have lost 15% in income over the past thirty years, the overall national income has been increasing drastically during that time. Who’s gaining from the increased national income? Only one group of Americans have benefited at all from that income growth; the wealthiest top 10% of all Americans. They made 15% in additional income over the last three decades.

So while on average incomes have risen in the U.S., the average worker’s income has not risen; its actually fallen. Although the U.S. is now making more in income per capita, adjusted for inflation, than at any other time in our history, all those billions and billions in higher profits have only gone to the wealthiest top 10% of all Americans. The wealthier the American, the more they’ve made over the last thirty years; take this shocker, for example of how much more those making the very highest incomes have made.

Since NAFTA and international free trade agreements started in earnest in 1994, they have indeed brought in higher rates of income nationally than ever before. But only 000.1% of all Americans, the very few wealthiest of us all, have made 427% of all the profits from NAFTA or free trade agreements; the rest of those profits were shared by the rest of Americans with incomes in the top 10%.

Out of those record profits which are generating more income for the U.S. than at any other time in our history, those Americans earning incomes below those in the top 10% haven’t got a penny. Zip. In fact those 90% of Americans have lost increasing amounts of income.

Think about it like this: The profits driving our national income up to its highest level ever are so great they make all American’s incomes overall rise, despite the loss of income for 90% of Americans who earn less than those in the top 10%

Those in the wealthiest 10% have earned that much more in additional income; it’s a staggeringly high amount, considering it offsets the 15% income loss 90% of Americans have experienced.

Now that is Income Distribution Inequality.

To summarize; overall the U.S. is making gobs more in income from advances in technology and international free trade than we’ve ever made before in our national history. Only one group has gotten all those profits, Americans making the highest 10% in income; everyone else in the 90% earning incomes below that- $104,000.00 to be precise- have lost income over the last three decades.

Don't take my word about those figures; check the National Bureau of Economic Research’s website and check on them for yourself if you need further proof.

Considering the last time Income Inequality was this great Americans plunged into the misery of the Great Depression ( except for those in the top 10% ), if you doubt my figures, it’s worth your time.

The Societal Retard


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • curmudgeon said on Apr 08, 2007....
    Gee - I thought it was overproduction and speculative investing that brought about the Great Depression, not this Income Inequality.
     
    You cite a trend 30s years or so in the making - putting your starting point at the 1970s, ostensibly when income inequality was lower than you say it is now.
     
    However, the unemployment rate in the 1970s was in the double digits. In essence, the "income divide" back then was even greater than it is now because a far higher proportion of the People had no income at all - save welfare - back then!
     
    What would you rather have - a low paying job with a possibility of moving up, or no job at all, but taking comfort in the thought that if you had one, some rich guy wouldn't be making all that much more than you?
     
    The other thing we might want to think about is that immigration has expanded the pool of working poor so as to skew the income distribution figures. I'm not blaming immigrants for wanting to come here and work, but they have driven down wages by increasing the number of competitors for jobs - particularly in the lower-paying segments of the labor market. That's great for corporate profitability, but not so great for American-born workers.
     
    This income-distribution analysis does not tell the whole story about our economy, nor the state of American workers in general.
     
    The opportunities for people to move up and start enterprises of their own has never been greater than it is today. Thanks to new technologies coming on the market, there is a far greater variety of professions people can enter than in the 1970s.
     
    Sorry, but your doom and gloom, wholly uncritical parroting of Paul Krugman just doesn't fly.
  • The-Societal-Retard said on Apr 10, 2007....
    Hmmm.... The Federal Goverment's own research finds that 40% of total income is going to the wealthiest 10% of all Americans, which is the highest point in 65 years, which was when? Oh yeah; the soup kitchen, not Starbucks, was the primary hot spot for socializing and survival. I agree completely with you that there are more opportunities today for people than ever; that's why so many citizens of other nations are taking advantage of them. You must have the means to either be taking advantage of them, or already have. Did you have parents that put you through college or pay it off ( Or are still paying it off ) on your own because you were able to secure the nessesary loans? I'm not saying that as an insult at all; i'm saying it because I want you to imagine if you were the child of a laid off union worker who couldn't pay for your schooling or help you too secure loans ( Fed. School Aid is cut, Perkins loans are gone, and if you got a private loan, or tried to today, you wouldn't with a laid off union worker as the top household earner ). Imagine if you couldn't go to school to learn the needed skills to take advantage of those opportunities; just put yourself in someone else's shoes. You might think differently about the economy then; as for what caused the depression, well many people might think a lassiez faire buisness climate played a role, and during it attitudes like your own were pretty discredited when the most ambitious, hardest workers had to sell apples for a nickel. Over production? You could very well be right. However you cannot deny that income inequality is out of control when our economy is so strong and as you said so many opportunities to get ahead are being created, yet 90%!!!!!!!! Of all Americans DROPPED in income while only the wealthiest 10% GAINED! Regardless of the 1970's unemployment rate ( when I believe 17.00 or 20.00 per hour adjusted for inflation was the average salary ), do you really think, can you truly say things are as they should be today??? You say income inequality doesn't tell the whole story; it doesn't. The whole story is even worse. When only a small percentage of the population has all the wealth, history shows they tend to pass policies ensuring they keep it ( If you have NY Times Online Select, look at June 25 2006 article in buisness section: Income Inequality and its Cost, by Anna Bernasek. It might be under 'Economic Views'. Like the Times for its all star reporting cast in recent years ( ha! ) or not, she uses hard facts to make her case). Great comment, by the way. Excellent points.
  • curmudgeon said on Apr 10, 2007....
    The economic spine of our nation is small business. I've seen so many immigrants from the Asian sub-continent come here, open newsstands or drive taxis, save and pool their money, then buy into franchises. They come here, start at bottom and work their way up.
     
    Sure, many might have advanced degrees, but you don't need one to run a bread and butter business. It's the same for people in the Chinese, Korean and other Asian communities. They builld a small business for themselves and pass on what they have to their children - an enterprising, hard working spirit and total commitment to success.
     
    Chinese small business owners generally work 6 and a half days a week. Can we say that this is true of the average American college grads?
     
    I'm really not sure at this point what your vision of what "ought to be" is. Should the guy who sweeps up in a pizzeria make the same as the owner? I would hope that your answer would be no. If it's yes we have nothing to talk about. Then how much more is an appropriate percentage for the owner? Who determines what is appropriate? The government? Some union boss? How much do you want to pay for a slice of pizza? What is the definition of a living wage? House? Car? Health care? College tuition? For sweeping floors?
     
    I don't mind income inequality so long as there is opportunity for everyone to work. Moving up or increasing their standard of living is up to them. Millions of far less-advantaged people have come here and succeeded, not just in the information sector, but by providing mundane services and having the personal vision to do greater things.
     
    The union worker you mention can't pay his child's tuition because his job and the jobs of his fellow workers are going overseas. Why? Because the cost of his labor (due to collective bargaining and regulation) is far greater than the exact same labor overseas. If that union worker doesn't adapt to the changing labor environment, of course he's going to be left out.
     
    BTW - yes I'm one of the few people who was blessed with parents who spent their life savings on my education. I've also been blessed with opportunities to work hard (for very little pay starting out, mind you) and work up. Now I'm on a different path and am working for very little indeed. I don't think any of it is unfair because it's largely been my choice.
  • The-Societal-Retard said on Apr 10, 2007....
    Hey- I respect that you used the term blessed to describe your circumstances- parents who worked hard to benefit their children and there's nothing wrong with that!
     
    As for the union workers; they built this country, and I believe they deserve better.
     
    I'm with you on a couple of key things; income inequality would almost have to be called something different if everyone has access to the opportuinities being created today, but they don't.  Those opportunities are definetly being created, too.
     
    I think making those opportunities available to all Americans isn;t just morally right, but educating them to be able to take advantage of them is crucial to our survival.
     
    We want to be kings of a global hill that no longer exists in a world gone flat, its a new game that's being played by the world community.
     
    Did you read the World is Flat by T Friedman?  WOW....excellent book.
     
    The definition of a living wage is a funny figure; no I don't think the sweeper at the pizza joint should make more than the owner, but he should have the same opportunities to be owner of his own pizza joint or do whatever he wants to try.
     
    One thing i'm of the belief we need as a matter of national survival; free educational rides to drag the best minds from all corners of the country, so we can compete with our best minds working for us in the increasingly interconnected and competitive world.
     
    Great comments again-
     
    Societal Retard
  • The-Societal-Retard said on Apr 10, 2007....
    Oh- as for those Chinese and other immigrants working that hard- i sure don't want to work that hard!  I admit it!
     
    I do respect it.  Do you know the mega tax breaks they get but U.S. citizens don't?  Kinda unfair.
     
     

Comment on "How Our Economy Can Be Strong & We Be So Poor: Income Inequality."

Income Gap economics politics globalization (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Science and propaganda merge in global warming "debate."...
Every week, I delve into our local city entertainment/op-ed/newspaper....

Even Chris Mathews at MSNBC is starting to question Obama.

...