hotaka's tags:

refulgence, abstruse, seditious, caviling, mellifluous, elucidate, frenetic, lambency, pseudepigrapha

I unabashedly admit there are still hundreds if not thousands of words in the English language with which I am not familiar. Almost every book I read introduces me to yet another list of words whose meanings are outside my lexicon. I lament my lack of education though I know the solution is simple: pick up the dictionary and find the meanings. With all good intents I keep a list of most words I don’t know when I read a book of particularly high-level vocabulary. But after many years of doing so I still haven’t looked up most of them.

invectives, laconic, perfidious, appurtenance, erudition, encomiastic, demimondaine, trundle, declivity

Several weeks ago I read a posting on SoulCast related to vocabulary. The author had posted a previous entry apparently using a very high level vocabulary. His readers had to use a dictionary to understand what he was talking about. The follow-up entry was a response to his original entry and those who commented on it. The author sounded far too vainglorious as he basically responded with deprecating and invidious remarks. He gloated in his vocabularius supremus (or is it the other way round?). While I found his remarks to be vexatious, I recognized the paucity of my own vocabulary, and I saw he had the obvious solution for us all: look up ten new words in the dictionary everyday. It was such a sensible thing that I could forgive him for his pomposity.

stentorian, terrigenous, fulminate, inculcate, pruriginous, grike, sconce, vespine, flounce, gilt, gnomon

It led to me to ponder a couple of things about vocabulary. The first was that I wondered how much people enjoyed reading the entry. I mean if a dictionary was needed to understand the meaning of every sixth word then reading the post was more like studying rather than enjoying a good read. I believe that most people read to enjoy a good story or learn something in a manner that is accessible to their capabilities in the language. While a high vocabulary may sound educated and impressive, what good is it if few people can understand what you are saying? In the end people will turn to blogs that they can read through and enjoy or from which they can feel things other than inferiority or discomfiture, or feel discombobulated.

The other thought was that many of us on SoulCast speak more than one language. There are plenty of bilingual, trilingual and multilingual bloggers here. While our English vocabulary might be deplorably penurious compared to someone with a PhD in the language, we know several hundred if not a couple of thousand words in other languages. At my school we have a book for children called First Thousand Words. The words are all simple daily things, mostly nouns. If you know all those words in another language then your total vocabulary is more expansive than you might give yourself credit for. If you know them in two other languages then more power to you. As an adult your vocabulary level probably goes beyond those first thousand words. The thing is that many words in English are nothing more than formal or literary forms of the more familiar vocabulary we use everyday. So whether we know five words for ‘wealthy’ in English or two in English and two or three in other languages it still measures out the same. Just we can communicate the concept of having wealth to people who don’t understand English but can understand the other languages.

caul, atherosclerotic, philately, vesicant, tergiversator, ovoviviparous, ignominy, inveigle, palaver

In conclusion, I think we could all do well to learn a few new words and try to incorporate them into our writing and speech. The lines of words I have stuffed in between my paragraphs have all come off my lists scribbled down as I read my books (and I haven't looked up the meanings of most of them yet). However, more importantly is that we can communicate our ideas and thoughts clearly. A good vocabulary helps but there is a limit to how much the average reader is willing to consult his dictionary or thesaurus while reading a blog or even a book for that matter. Good advice I once heard is to always use the vernacular when writing. You will reach a greater number of people if you do.

When the heck am I supposed to use words like stereoisomerism anyway?



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • silverwhisper said on Feb 16, 2007....
    i have, by most people's standards, a good vocabulary, but the purpose in communication is to make sure someone one the other side of your communication understands what's being said.

    being able to speak or write in a way that your audience understands readily is what matters most. vocabulary size--like the size of many things--is IMHO overrated.

    ed
  • kruuyai said on Feb 16, 2007....

    A very well written essay, hotaka, and I couldn't agree with you more.  And ed as well.  I write exactly the way I talk... while I realize that I don't speak exactly the same way that everyone else does, and sometimes I use vocabulary that may be new for some people, I usually do it (I hope) in such a way that people should be able to figure it out from the context (which I've always thought is the best way to learn new vocabulary anyway... that's how I do it in other languages). 

    I agree that the main point of writing is to communicate, and you have to consider your audience.  Simply using long or little-known words to impress people comes off as using long or little-known words to impress people.  It doesn't. 

    If I'm reading fiction, and it seems apparent to me that the author has struggled to make his prose sound arty, I'm turned off by it, and i have a hard time concentrating on a story.  Much as I appreciate well written prose, it has to be done artfully enough so that it remains in the background of the story.  If the words draw more attention than the message, then the message gets lost.

  • Alyss said on Feb 16, 2007....
    I enjoyed this very much hotaka but I feel the need to reach for the dictionary now. ;-)

    I don't have a high falutin vocabulary. Mine is broad, and I can intersperse the occasional obscure word in amongst the more common ones, but I like to think that what I write is readable. Certainly I don't want my vocabulary to be considered paltry but I see no reason to make what I write incomprehensible.
  • secretlife said on Feb 16, 2007....

    hotaka:  i knew about 50% of the words in between your paragraphs....

    i saw atherosclerotic and was wondering if you were reading medical journals!

    usually if i'm reading something and i don't understand alot of the words, i will stop reading.  if i can't understand what's being said, i'm kinda wasting my time, no?

  • GumpyJumptooth said on Feb 16, 2007....
    Hell, it's been a month of Sundays since I...used a...colloquial, um...

    ...Aw, shit.
  • hotaka said on Feb 16, 2007....

    To everyone, what you all said was my point exactly. Putting in a neat word here and there sounds good but there is no need to overdo it. Looking at my post it seems like a young bird in a nest trying to stretch its wings but not managing successfully. And that was what I wanted. Writing big words can be cumbersome. Writing is about communicating. Big words are nice, but let's be understood first. Most of us don't have such a richly developed vocabulary anyway so there's no need to overachieve in writing. However, I will say that I find many formally known words are being replaced by the simpler verb/preposition pairs (get over, stand back, etc. - there's a word for them, I know). Sadly, in some ways, I see the English language as becoming simplified. George Orwell was right to mention it in 1984. We shouldn't let all go to waste.

    Gumpy, great comment. I chuckled aloud.

  • pickersplock said on Feb 16, 2007....
    Hotaka, you bring up a very good point and I would like to add a thought.
    Writing needs to be flow. When it gets cluttered with unecessary words or
    or when the author starts showing off his or her vocabulary without regard to
    the reader. The work becomes awkward and unpleasant to read. I just finished
    reading Codex; I'm too lazy to go get the book and I can't remember the author's
    name. It was a good story, but as I was reading I kept thinking, "Has this guy
    ever read his stuff out loud?" I understood the words, but they just didn't sound good together and it honestly kept me from enjoying the book as much as
    I would have, had he simplified his writing.
  • mom said on Feb 16, 2007....
    WHAT?!!!!  I don't speak dictionary :)
  • CreativeWoman said on Feb 17, 2007....
    I have a pretty good vocabulary too.  However, some of those words I need to look up. ;-)

    CW
  • hotaka said on Feb 17, 2007....
    CW, when you have could you please tell me the definitions? I am too lazy.
  • CreativeWoman said on Feb 17, 2007....
    hotaka,

    Will do.  lol

    CW
  • JadeLondon said on Feb 17, 2007....
    I concur. But most importantly, when it comes to another's writing, I want to hear his/her true voice.

    My father had this wonderful dictionary at his office when I was a freshman in college. It not only told the origin of the word, but the possible date of origin. I found it fascinating. Strange, I know.

    You are a man of many wise words, Hotaka. :)

  • hotaka said on Feb 17, 2007....

    Thanks Jade. Too bad I don't know the meaning of many of them. Unless of course you were refering to my comments.

    I would love to get my hands on that dictionary. I am very interested in etymology.

  • louthomas said on Feb 17, 2007....
    I have an extremely large vocabulary; when I was in the 5th grade, I had a first year college reading level.

    Yet, I've spent my professional life communicating, both by mouth and by written word.  The rule you have to learn is that, despite how much you want the PRECISE word for the situation, the more understandable one, even if awkward, is the better choice.  The best thoughts in the world are worthless if no one can understand them.

    Granted, it's fun to tell someone that you're going to defenestrate them, but it's much more understandable to tell them you're getting ready to throw them out the window.

    There was a story many years ago of the lobbyist trying to kill an educationall bill in Florida.  He took the key legislator to lunch and, over dessert, said, "Cal, what's goin' on at that-there university?"  Huh?  "I got it on good authority that, over to Gainesville, they got boys and girls matriculating together now."

    No!

    "Oh, yeah.  Fact is, they're even sharing the same syllabus over there."

    Say it isn't so!

    "Yep, and they've got it set up now so that a professor can make a girl student show him her thesis anytime he wants."

    The education bill failed.

    Words can obfuscate as well as illuminate.
  • JadeLondon said on Feb 17, 2007....
    Hotaka: I have been taxing my brain all morning in an effort to remember the name of that bloomin' dictionary. Looks like I've got a date with Google. Anyway, when I figure it out, I'll give you a heads up.
  • JadeLondon said on Feb 17, 2007....
    Hotaka: P.S. Don't underestimate yourself, my friend.
  • hotaka said on Feb 20, 2007....

    louthomas, thanks so much for your input. I envy you. When I was in fifth grade I used to make it a rule to look up ten words I didn't know and try to use them in my reports and creative writing assignments. My teacher told me she needed a dictionary for one story I wrote (a sequel to Alien before Aliens came out). Too bad I stopped that practice.

    I am often sure when I want to say something that there is indeed a word for it in English but I don't know it. I wish I had a computer that would accept my definitions of a word and then suggest which words I might be looking for.

    I love that word defenestrate. How often does anyone use that? I can see its composition. De for undoing something, fene must be Latin since I recognize fenetre for window in French, and -strate makes it a verb. Does it come in other forms such as defenestrative or defenestration? I can imagine students being upset with their teacher and holding a meeting saying, "We've suffered enough from Mr. Hotaka and his tyranny. It's time for defenestrative action!" It would be more understandable to throw someone out the door. Then you could just deport them (ha, ha). Is there a word for throwing someone from a moving vehicle? How about off a bridge? Following the French connection that would be deponticate?

    Obfuscate. There's a word I know but never think to use. *Sigh*

  • aqualena said on Mar 07, 2007....
    Wonderful!  Language is fascinating, especially the etymology.

    JadeLondon, I believe the dictionary you're referring to is the Oxford English Dictionary.  It comes in volumes.

    A couple years ago I had a class called HEL, which stands for History of the English Language.  I enjoyed the class until I had to memorize the symbols that depict what sound vowels and consanants make.  They added an additional fifteen letters to my alphabet!

    I am not as knowledged in my lexicon as to say I knew every word between the paragraphs, but I was happy if I knew one per line.

    I don't know who it was that said context is a great way to understand a word, but this is true.  However, trying to tell someone else what the word means can be difficult.

    I do look up words when I'm reading novels.  True it's a pain in the ass, but sometimes it can greatly clarify part of the story.  Also, if it's an older book and the word doesn't have the same definition now as it did then, it's a good idea to look up the word.  Most know by now that faggot is a bundle of sticks and twigs.  Just thought I'd throw and example out there.

    If anyone does decide to check out the Oxford English Dictionary, count how many times a word is first used by Shakespeare.  That man invented so many words!

    I think I've rambled enough, but I want to leave a few words I recently re-discovered and want to share them with the wonderful people at soulcast.

    - abhor: to regard with extreme repugnance; to loathe
    - droll: having a humorous, whimsical, or odd quality
  • hotaka said on Mar 07, 2007....

    Thanks aqualena for your input. One of my favourite lines from Hamlet is when he is asked what he is reading and he answers, "Words, words, words." I loved the way Mel Gibson did that part.

    I don't know exactly how to tie this in further with your comment but I couldn't think of a fancy way to say I appreciated your contribution.

Comment on "Range of Vocabulary"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

a list of Celtic Tree signs associated with the time of year that you were born....
if you wanted an explanation, which you don't, it would go something like this.


wrapped up
in his dear warm fangs

are the pangs
of
my...
words ...

Subscribe to the SoulCast Newsletter To Receive the Best Uncensored Blogs About Love, Sex, Relationships, God, Politics, and More.


Ever wonder what people really think and how they really live?

Read about the real lives of regular people like you whose powerful moving blogs will make you smile, cry, emotional, and warm inside.

Your FREE SoulCast newsletter is just moments away. Receive your first feel-good blog by entering your email address below.

First Name:
Your Email:


You can unsubscribe at any time with one click. We NEVER sell or share your email address with anyone. Period. close