I.S.: Your point is one of my biggest reasons I'm not so sold on the idea of vaccinating my daughter. Seriously, I am just not comfortable with the idea of vaccinating a 10 year old for an STD, just on principle.
However, to play Devil's Advocate - they feel that this is the age to vaccinate because for some reason it must be done before the girl becomes sexually active and I guess 6th grade is the average age girls start to menstruate. (Off topic, but WTF is that about either? Most of my friends didn't start until around 8th grade. I think it *is* something in the milk.)
I will move my girls to a different state before I allow such a thing.
It is that simple for me.
"Most women with HPV infection do not get cervical cancer. Doctors believe other factors must come into play for this cancer to develop. Some of these factors are smoking, HIV infection, Chlamydia infection, diet, long-term use of birth control pills, multiple pregnancies, low income, mothers who took hormonal drug DES, and family history. These are not typical risk factors affecting junior high girls. A large percent of the population already has the virus, and there is no research saying that the vaccine will prevent cancer. According to the National Institutes of Health National Cancer institute, in more than 90% of the cases, HPV infections are harmless and go away without treatment. The CDC says there are more than 100 strains or types of HPV and over 30 strains are sexually transmitted. Yet the vaccine under consideration for mandate covers only 4 strains. About 30% of cervical cancers can’t be prevented by the vaccine, so women will still need regular cervical cancer screenings. The only current vaccine manufacturer for the HPV vaccine, Merck, admits on their package insert that the duration of immunity from the vaccine is unknown. In clinical trials, the vaccine’s effectiveness was only followed for 4 years. Yet we do know from the CDC that the incubation period for the HPV virus is about 20 years and the median age of women diagnosed with cervical cancer is 48. Therefore, no claims to proof of cervical cancer prevention by vaccinating preteen girls should be made." TLC www.texlife.org
I have never been interested in discussions like this where people who would otherwise be considered intelligent and open suddenly narrow everything down to "YOU are just a "puritan" or whatever.
ANYone who would suggest that I would keep necessary health treatments from my girls knows nothing of me and in that very statement loses all credibility. The fact is, the state of Texas is getting bought in this and I personally? Not for sale.
This vaccine should NEVER have become mandatory this quickly. FOUR years of testing? Four? NONE of the now required vaccines moved that quickly, in fact large numbers of people refused them even after the governments got behind them. AND THE GOVERNMENTS LET THEM refuse.
I don't need a nanny, thanks.
I have a fourteen year old, a twelve year old, a ten year old and an eight year old.
THREE of my four children will be forced to have this vaccine NOW. As soon as the mandate kicks in which is JUNE.
Lots of people have the time to sit back and see what horrifying things it might do to someone else....I am not one of them.