worldbeater's tags:
worldbeater's most popular posts:
worldbeater reads (2):
Who's reading worldbeater (3):

US will attack Iran?

worldbeater posted on Jan 15, 2007 | views: 396 | Tags: iran, the US, world hypocrisy, attack, iraq, CNN, pakistan

One CNN report says that “White House: Can't rule out attack on Iran”.

 

According To the report, the White House did not rule out the possibility of attacking Iran.

 

US is accusing Iran of supporting Iraqi insurgents.

 

I remember one e-mail in circulation when Iraq was attacked, that the US will attack Syria, Iran and Pakistan after Iraq.

 

The question is, has the US turned into a “terminator”, a war monger who just has to keep on fighting some country or the other, on some pretext or another, continuing bloodshed across the globe?

 

( read the full story)



send to a friend del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • curmudgeon said on Jan 15, 2007....
    Yeah right - as though there would be peace all about the globe if the US simply stopped attacking folks. As though they would stop attacking us if we shied away from every conflict.
     
    The price of being the most powerful country in the world is having to sit there and take all this crap from a bunch of violent, death loving hypocrites about how we're the cause of all their problems.
     
    Let them all look in a mirror.
     
    As to the US attacking Iran - it's clear your source has no idea about how global negotiations are conducted.
  • bloc said on Jan 15, 2007....
    "As though they would stop attacking us if we shied away from every conflict."

    I don't remember iran, Iraq, or syria ever attacking us.
  • NobodySpecial said on Jan 15, 2007....
    Curmudgeon- Bush doesn't handle global negotiations so well.
  • kelly said on Jan 16, 2007....
    The US doesn't shy away from conflict.  It quite often creates it.  When it comes to terrorism no country is more hypocritical than the US.
  • worldbeater said on Jan 16, 2007....
    Curmudgeon- thanks for putting up your comments. I agree that being the sole superpower, the US has responsibilty to "curb" the terrorist activities around the world, but.. who starts these activities and supports the "terrorists"? Who pampered Saddam and Iraq with chemical weapons when it was fighting with Iran? Who had business relations with Osama? who is giving military aid and billions of dollars as aid to Pakistan despite calling it a hub of Afgan terrorists? How come the US destroyed one whole country and killed hundreds of thousand of it's citizes, caught their President and hanged him, but has not been able to trace one single person who was directly responsible for terrorist attacks on the US?
  • SillyMommy62902 said on Feb 19, 2007....
    "As to the US attacking Iran - it's clear your source has no idea about how global negotiations are conducted."

    Negotiations?  The U.S. won't even sit down and talk with Iran.  Iran actually offered peace, including stopping their nuclear program a few years ago.  In a recent congressional hearing, this subject was brought up to Rice who claimed she didn't remember the letter in question.  Selective memory.  You gotta love it.

Comment on "US will attack Iran?"

iran the US world hypocrisy attack iraq CNN pakistan (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Subscribe to the SoulCast Newsletter To Receive the Best Uncensored Blogs About Love, Sex, Relationships, God, Politics, and More.


Ever wonder what people really think and how they really live?

Read about the real lives of regular people like you whose powerful moving blogs will make you smile, cry, emotional, and warm inside.

Your FREE SoulCast newsletter is just moments away. Receive your first feel-good blog by entering your email address below.

First Name:
Your Email:


You can unsubscribe at any time with one click. We NEVER sell or share your email address with anyone. Period. close