phyxius_has_risen's tags:
Who's reading phyxius_has_risen (12):

The terrorists groups Hamas and al-Qaida have their foundations in Islam. Both of these organizations have interpreted the teachings of Islam in a violent manner. Al-Qaida calls for the founding of a "pan-Islamic Caliphate" to overthrow and expel Westerners". Hamas views any attempts at peace as turning over control to "non-believers", and they refuse to take part in any efforts for peace.

The United States must realize the enemy this country is now facing. The philosophy in the Middle East is one of retaliation and the appearance of strength. The members of both Al-Qaida and Hamas are willing to die for their cause. Suicidal attacks are common, and they will not back down or look weak.

America's course of action has always been to attempt diplomacy and peace talks. Anyloss of American lives proves to be unacceptable to this country. Pulling out of a country where fellow compatriots are put at risk seems completely logical to Americans, but this action appears weak and cowardly to these terrorist organizations.

The worst possible course of action that the United States could take would be to pull out of the Middle East. Because of the militant philosophy of both of these religious groups, inaction will not bring peace. Although pulling out would make sense from the American point of view, it would be seen as weakness from the point of view of al-Qaida and Hamas. These groups would take this failure to retaliate as a victory and simply continue their attacks more aggressively. A strong showing is the only language these terrorists will understand.

When the United States takes into account who it is dealing with, the fact remains that no alternative to aggressions exists. The loss of lives for the present would be nothing compared to the magnitude of future attacks if these two terrorists groups are handed a victory. The United States must make a strong showing and assert its power over these cowardly organizations.



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • silverwhisper said on Dec 03, 2006....
    what in your view is the proper course of action?

    ed
  • phyxius_has_risen said on Dec 03, 2006....
    When you make the consequence of a terroist act more dreadful than the terroist act itself, you will win the war on terror. To do this we must first adopt the removal of civil and liberties and human rights as the terroists have done.
  • silverwhisper said on Dec 03, 2006....
    removal of those rights for whom?

    ed
  • phyxius_has_risen said on Dec 03, 2006....
    To the terrorist and contries that support and harbor them ed.
  • phyxius_has_risen said on Dec 03, 2006....
    ed you have asked me two questions and answered them, could you please tell me what your thoughts are?
  • silverwhisper said on Dec 03, 2006....
    well, i wanted to make sure i understood precisely what your view was before i responded. discussing politics often leads to disagreement, and i was trying to ascertain to extent to which i disagree w/ you.

    personally, i agree that leaving now is a bad idea. not for the reasons you gave but b/c the failure of the interim iraqi govt would result in yet another theocracy after all the bloodletting and revenge-seeking was over b/n sunnis and shiites.

    i'm less concerned w/ how they view us. in fact, i think that permitting the would-be mass murderers to frame our response is a mistake. by letting their idea of the meaning our actions matter, we give them too much power over our range of possible responses. it's like trying to reason w/ an insane person to me.

    i'm not certain precisely what i want the course of action to be. now that we've been committed, i think we should either increase our presence significantly and give american soldiers the ability to defend themselves the way, or change the scope of the deployment and reduce troop levels accordingly.

    ed
  • phyxius_has_risen said on Dec 04, 2006....
    ed its ok to disagree so never shy away from saying anything...in a way I agree with however, if we increase our presence we have to give our service personal the ability to fight them with a no hold bar type of fighting as I mentioned before, as far as reducing our troops I think that would be a sign of weakmess and in the future some will say America is weak so lets go attack them again. (I do kmow that 9-11 and the war in Iraq are two different things)
  • silverwhisper said on Dec 04, 2006....
    i generally don't shy away from anything, either. :> and honestly, i think some will say that we're weak no matter what evidence to the contrary exists. these are the same folks who demanded rioting for those stupid cartoons, after all: i mentioned insanity very specifically for a reason. :>

    ed
  • phyxius_has_risen said on Dec 04, 2006....
    lol.....love your comments and always look forward to them
  • missb said on Dec 04, 2006....
    Phyxius,

    So which one do you think is more dangerous, islam or muslims?

    Cheers :)

Comment on "The Reason We Must Win The War On Terror"

islam Al-qaida terrorists Hamas war terrorism (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Al-Emran 45-47...
Al-Emran 59-64...
Al-Emran 78...
Of the Miracles of Allah’s Messenger Prayer and Peace upon him

Understanding Animals...
Baqarah 278-281...