• raulraffinknockknock said on Dec 01, 2006....

  you took their abuses long enough - now heap them back!!

• sheemAfeM said on Dec 01, 2006....

  You give your adversaries plenty of rope, don't you?

• Dreamknightx said on Dec 01, 2006....

  "...squirting zit puss..."
   
  Ewwww.  I love it!
   
   

• TheUndergroundEagle said on Dec 01, 2006....

  Gee, I feel left out.  No clever comebacks for my comments?
  Or am I beneath your notice?

• celestialspace2001 said on Dec 01, 2006....

  You waited a whole week to answer your critics.  Have you been on another secret mission?  I notice that Hunter is missing again, but no one seems concerned.  Did you eat him?

• TheNakedProfessor said on Dec 01, 2006....

  I challenge you to a duel.  High Noon.  The Grand Canyon.  January 1.
   
   You're a dead man.

• Dreamknightx said on Dec 01, 2006....

  You hate us, but you warn us.Therefore, you like us! Gotcha!

• copsunited said on Dec 01, 2006....

  Shitborg, you still need help. Put your head in a bucket of water every thirty minutes for a half hour. That should cure what ails you son. Better yet a 9mm pill.

• PAPERBACKWRITER said on Dec 01, 2006....

  Thank you, your surliness Sir!
  
  My father, bless his soul - always said good manners will bring you a long way.
  
  In this breath, I am honoured that you deemed me worthy of a response, for I am now not only fascinated by you, oh great grouch of SoulCast history - I am impressed by your sole existence.
  
  I await your next prose of social SoulCast critique with bated breath.
  
  I am your fellower (I coined the word), if it tickles your fancy, I will elaborare in your next blog *wink*)
  
  Paper~
  
  P.S.
  
  I had my first hate comments yesterday, Sithborg sir - I said to myself, nothing despicable that can happen to me here in SoulCast afterwards will touch me. So, what the heck, admitting I am your follower and it´s consequences will be the least worry I will have, right?
  
  Thanks, for the advice. I consult Merriam Webster regularly since blogging in SC for I speak almost 24/7 and sometimes dream in German.
  
  Therefore, do blog more your surliness sir (even about the weather: a great interest of mine) for you increase the power of my vocabulary, sir.
  
  P.S.S.
  
  Sir, if you did eat Hunter, could you please disgorge him out.  he is like you a legend in SC.  I would have been honoured to have had a chance of discourse with him.
  
  As with you, if you will stoop yourself and post a blog, which is at the level of my intellectual capacity.
  
  I remain....PBW
  
  P.S.S
  
  Just in case someone misunderstood and think you are not talking in a general sense in the last paragraph.
  
   ...I´m a gurrrl and cannot fuck (well, I can actually but it is another topic altogether), but if my husband is not stressed nor I , I can be fucked.
  
  Actually, I am fucked because I spent a long time responding to these.  Well, I am already in theraphy (really) and under medications....so there.
  

• RollingC said on Dec 01, 2006....

  Geez Sith....I feel left out also. What happened...didn't hate you enough?
  (it's a character flaw I got)
  

• moonriver said on Dec 02, 2006....

  hey, i know you sithborg. you're danny from anthro-L, aren't you?

• JadeLondon said on Dec 02, 2006....

  CelestialSpace2001: Actually, I wonder of Hunter quite often.

• HalGal said on Dec 02, 2006....

  People like you scare me, you're probably the quiet nerd who sits at home on a Friday night because you feel you're "too intelligent" to go out with a girl but the truth probably is that the people who know you in real life are just as turned off by your demeanor as the people here are by your rhetoric. Are you sad because nobody at work wants to listen to your conspiracy theories around the water cooler? If you become the guy who sits on the tower shooting at random people and they catch you on the news, can you give a sign that you are sithborg so that I can rest assure one less looney is on the streets? Thanks...

• ALIENated said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Sithborg (Sithborg, Sithborg), you da man. You are one of the cornerstones of SoulCast. I almost lose interest in this Weenieville, but then you, or someone like you, shows up just in time to revitalize my interest. Where is Hunter indeed, and Worf? God I miss the good ole days (last summer). All we have now is a bunch of fat-butted mom types that I fantasize about doing dog fashion 24X7. Not that there is anything wrong with that. Yeeow. One has to keep their head in the game somehow. Thanks for helping me stay interested in the god-forsaken Weenieville.

• RollingC said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Grand Canyon here we come again.... Dear Sithborg: Please reserve me a ticket for the showdown between you and TNP. I love watching classics............ Yours Truly .............RollingC.

• HalGal said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Alienated, I think you are confused on what is making Sithborg "da man". Yes, I think that it's GREAT, WONDERFUL that someone is talking about something other then "So what is your favorite recipie..." or some shit like that but come on, just because a lonely little boy who sits at home with his startrek badge and a thesaurus and writes a bunch of hate down does not qualify a pat on the back.

• JadeLondon said on Dec 02, 2006....

  ALIENated: I think Sithy is one of the few that doesn't discriminate: he hates everyone!

  However, I cannot deny the true meaning behind his words: life itself has a sort of futileness. We live to die, yada, yada. Really, what will all this matter a million years from now? It won't, other than in possible evolutionary outcomes. But hell, that won't matter either. We'll probably nuke ourselves before then, or do ourselves off with a bio-weapon.

  Anyway, I digress. If the age of the universe were a roll of toliet paper, we'd only be the mere sheds clinging to the empty cardboard roll. So, what makes us think we are so special?

  SithBorg's prose may be reeking with hate, but the message is the same.

  So, why do we live? It seems such a waste of time.

  But I suppose I will make the most of it while I'm here.

  He does keep things interesting, no?

• pickersplock said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Revenge of the Pickersplock! Ha, ha, got your attention! Hey, seriously, you've got that whole sado/maso thing going. Sith? Please! If you spent a little less time on Star Wars and found the right dominatrix you could be happy! And Alien you don't know how wrong you are.....fat-butted? Why, when you think about it we could be just about anyone. I think you'd be pleasantly surprised, so stop profiling us! Jade, life is very entertaining! It's always fun to find out what's going to happen next. For example, will our friend Sith answer in a totally predictable manner, call me names, say something about how pathetic I am again, or will something unexpected happen? I predict the predictable! Come on Sith prove me wrong! I dare you!

• ALIENated said on Dec 02, 2006....

  HalGal, JadeLondon: so sorry. Did you think I actually read the original piece. Much too long for me. I was just talking about all the hype. I knew it was a bunch of negative stuff, but I did not go deep enough to be affected. I love that toilet paper metaphor, though. That is right on.
  
  Why we live? That is a question every person has to answer. I personally think we are here to learn about God and find our way to Him. I see life as a big highway. One direction it toward God, goodness, and light. The other direction is toward Satan, badness, and darkness. We are all traveling one direction or the other. We may be in the big middle of the highway, to the left, or to the right, but headed one way or the other none the less. Whether we like it or not.

• RollingC said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Hey moonriver...sorry I missed your comment.
  So it's Danny Sithborg huh?
  Now he's got a first name...hehehehe.
  

• JadeLondon said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Pickersplock: They also say the truth is stranger than fiction! :)

  ALIENated: Thanks--I wish I could take full credit for having coined the metaphor, but I guess you cannot have it all! My prof used it as an example in my geology class eight years ago.

• kelly said on Dec 02, 2006....

  "I'm sure that at least one of you is slightly less of an asshole than before."
  
  True. Sadly, the same cannot be said of you.

• Ormocanon said on Dec 02, 2006....

  Sithborg, you must have ran out of Prozac.

• ALIENated said on Dec 03, 2006....

  I figure with the multimedia stuff we have today (video, recodings, data banks), future generations will not only hear about things from the 20th and 21st centuries, they will be able to watch and listen to them. I just hate that they will have to weed through all the history rewrites that are going on today. 1984 is a concept, not a year.

• moonriver said on Dec 03, 2006....

  hey you guys, leave my friend danny the sithborg alone. he's really a retired professor and a kick-ass social critique at heart. yo danny, your stuff at the anthro-l archive site need some editing real bad. playing hookey here again huh?

• SithBorg said on Dec 04, 2006....

  An intellectually undistinguished critic took issue with my predictions and assessment of our historical significance, and I have generously spent a few moments – ever optimistic about saving one or two minds out there from total rot-logic – to show you in simple terms why you should never go off on a tangent just to be adversarial. At the end of the critique, the obviously frustrated-for-attention blathermouth begged me to get mad and start a fight with him so that he, too, can become notorious. Silly. Ignoring him was easy. Here’s why… I WROTE: "In 10 years, no one will directly remember World War Two." DICK CRITIC: Nonsense! There are still some people alive who remember World War ONE! Okay, there are not many, but there are some. For example, there is the Russian caricaturist B. Sergeij Jefimov, born in 1900. (He visited Prague recently for an exhibition of his works, and he still teaches as the head of the Dept for Caricature in the Russian Academy of Arts. He still remembers the Tzar, and, of course, the effects of the first World War.) And anyone born around 1930 would have been in their mid-teens in 1945 -- and there are a lot of people in that age bracket who are still around now and I expect many of them still WILL be in ten years. And a ten-year-old in 1945 -- only 70 or 71 today -- will only be just over 80 in ten years from now. MY CORRECTION: Excuse me, Professor Einstein, you seem to have missed the word “directly.” I doubt that there were many 10 year olds from 1945 who were involved in the combat. There is just one American veteran of WWI who is still alive…oops. There he went. Most WWII vets are now 80-90 years old or more. Technically, even I remember WWI because of my grandfather’s stories. But not “directly.” And even if I am wrong, how wrong am I? Maybe it will be 20 years. Same result. This is nit-picking at its dullest. I WROTE: "In 50 years, Hitler will be a footnote, the Holocaust an oddity, and the 20th century a romanticized period of optimism." DICK CRITIC: You have given absolutely no reasonable basis for making this statement and it is insupportable in all respects. Considering that people like Napoleon and even Julius Caesar are still known and studied, to consign the man responsible for the bloodiest war in history to 'a footnote' is not only absurd but insulting to all who suffered, directly or indirectly, because of him. If you think the Holocaust will become nothing but an oddity I quail to think what you consider historically significant. MY ANSWER: Ask your neighbor about the Armenian genocide. Or the contributions of Frederick Douglass. How about the details of the Spanish-American War? And can you tell me the state in which today’s oil industry started? Or the meaning of Wounded Knee? In the year 2056, your great-great-great grandchildren will not give a fuck about Hitler or the Holocaust. If even Napoleon has been reduced to a caricature of a midget with his hand tucked into his jacket, why should the one-dimensional Hitler fare any better? What, are you Jewish? Oy! I WROTE: "In 100 years, The Beatles, Hollywood and every major star of today will be forgotten." DICK CRITIC: This morning I was watching Laurel and Hardy on TV. The film was over 70 years old. And what about Charlie Chaplin, who was a megastar in the 1920s? Have you forgotten him? It won't be long before it will be up around a century since his first films were made, and I suspect that at least some stars will still be known of in 100 years from now. And you stated an absolute. You said EVERY major star; you did not even allow for the possibility of ONE! Again, you are spouting nonsense. WITH LOVE FROM ME TO YOU: I never spout. However I do read. And as Alvin Toffler pointed out in 1970, the pace and acceleration of change is increasing exponentially. Since then, any number of observers have noted that there has been more change – sociologically and technologically – in the last 150 years than in the entire previous millennium. The Medium Is The Message. Things are not slowing down. How many people ages 8 to 30 today can name the Beatles? Consider how many Laurel & Hardy fans die each year as opposed to how many new fans they gain. Consider the startling increase in the number of “celebrities” even since the 1960s. In 2106 Hollywood will be “forgotten” (in the sense of the man-on-the-street, 40 years old, asked “Do you know what Hollywood was famous for?”) because its industry will be so universally dispersed. In 1910, which state in the USA was considered the giant of the oil industry? Are you sure? Today, just 96 years later, most people would say “Texas,” and feel quite logical about it. Wrong. I WROTE: "In 500 years the United States, the United Nations and nationalism itself will be anachronistic." DICK CRITIC: You spoiled what looked like a reasonably acceptable concept by throwing 'nationalism' in the mix. Again, thousands of years of human history -- and the human tendency to identify a 'home' -- condemn your statement to the trash bin. REALITY CHECK: Here the critic has really revealed some ignorance of history and lack of imagination. This is the problem when a critic goes on an all-out rampage to degrade his subject. Carelessness. Nationalism is historically modern. The nation-state began to take hold as a concept during the middle ages and did not see fruition until Germany and France and England had their asses kicked from the inside out in democratic revolutions. Nationalism is the belief that those who share common language, history and culture should constitute an independent geographical state free of foreign domination. It’s a form of segregation. More likely, some post-corporate invention will replace language and culture and geography as criteria for “us-against-the-world.” I WROTE: "In 1,000 years all of our wars, inventions, words of wisdom and greatest structures will be of interest only to the scholars." MEISTER MOUTHOFF: ALL inventions? You mean, out of all the MILLIONS of things that have been invented, not ONE of them will be of any interest to anyone but scholars? Absolutely not even ONE?? MY CHALLENGE: You will notice that no example is given. Absolutely not even ONE. Out of MILLIONS. Can anyone offer up an example of something about us that will be memorable, or even significant, in 1,000 years? I am honestly trying and can’t. Simply protesting the statement with incredulity hardly negates the statement. Examples please? I’ll be hungrily searching the comment section below. DICK CRITIC: You make such blanket statements it is frankly incredible that you can understand the concept of hitting keys on a keyboard to produce this drivel in words for us. And words of wisdom? Well, we are not getting any from you but thankfully there are many people with the ability to profess words of wisdom. And strangely, it never goes out of fashion. ME IN RESPONSE: Are you absolutely sure about that? I WROTE: "In 5,000 years none of our present cities will stand, few will be studied and reminisced, and the concept of the city itself will have morphed beyond recognition." DICK CRITIC: Uh huh. Again the absolutes. NONE of our present cities will stand. It's interesting that when archaeologists have had the chance to dig around some of the older parts of Babylon, a city that has been continuously inhabited for over 5000 years (some say 7000), they have no difficulty in identifying earlier buildings and the ancient city plan. Because cities have certain characteristics, without which they are not cities at all. So the concept of the city, while it has undergone some changes, has fundamentally remained the same even through the changes in culture and technology that have been going on since they began. If you 'morph' the concept too far it is no longer a city. MY GENEROUS RESPONSE: This circular argument solely depends on the critic defining the characteristics of a city – which he never does. As “hubs of civilization,” comparing Babylon 4000 B.C. with Hong Kong 2006 for similar characteristics brings new meaning to the term “generalizations.” And I’ll guess that Civilization in the year 7006 will be radically different than Hong Kong today. Incidentally, our current building materials don’t hold up all that well over centuries, much less millennia. IN CONCLUSION: I stand by the original article. Answering my critic has reaffirmed my absolute faith in it. I’m sure he’s a very nice grandfather, but I see absolutely no reason whatsoever to subscribe to him. POSTSCRIPT: I did think of ONE thing that may be memorable 1,000 years from now, because it truly is a breakthrough in human evolution. Perhaps in facing stark reality, a future for humanity is actually possible. And there is finally an instrument shaking the foundations of complacency which just might accomplish that… Me.

• RollingC said on Dec 04, 2006....

  Geeeeeshh that was long.   And windy too. When have you ever known things to stay the same? Who knows what the future is going to bring in the long run so why worry about it now?  Worrying about today is a better way to spend your time.
  No matter...I still like you Sith...in the funny farm... where life is beautiful all the time.
  

• celestialspace2001 said on Dec 04, 2006....

  Sithy, you were kind enuff to delete that long-winded guy who tried to blog you down, then you summerized his arguments here and refuted them in an equally long-winded response. Are you going to block him from your blog? You know he'll be pissed because you've wiped him and now you're making up names for him. I sense another Grand Canyon smackdown in the making. He's got to be answering with his own blog any minute now....or coming back in under a new ID. People hate it most when you ignore them. It's the worst insult of all. The effective negation of existence. Your specialty!!!!

• hunter_boyce_chandler said on May 06, 2007....

  I came back Sith.  I missed your poetry.  This is a much smaller place without you.

  HBC

• radioclash said on Jun 03, 2007....

  hahahahaha you are so fucking smart, sithborg. you probably shit metaphors, and then roll around on the floor in your verbal prowess. but that's not enough, you actually have to tell everybody how smart you are. you remind me of my girlfriend, and i am unimpressed.

  -rc

Comment on "SithBorg Answers Whiners Who Love To Hate The Truth"

Currently tagged	revenge Truth zits ignorance Hunter duel subconscious God scratch his ass weather blogging Sithborg blogs perspective psychology HBC sociology looking for attention rant (Click to add tags below)
Tag this post	(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Your comment