Don't you all think that part of the reason religion seems to breed intolerance is because how many religions teach that their way is the only way?
Copsunited: I still diasagree with you. Religion, most religions anyway, teach that their way is the only way to god. These beliefs breed intolerance of other religions. Intolerance of other relgions breeds religious persecutions and fanatics. What seems to be the root cause here?
Copsunited: Religions don’t say there is only one way to God, huh. Christianity does, look at these bible verses?
John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Acts 4:8-12 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: "Rulers and elders of the people! If we are being called to account today for an act of kindness shown to a cripple and are asked how he was healed, then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. He is
" 'the stone you builders rejected,
which has become the capstone. Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved."
The religions you mentioned as having their ‘own’ messiah don’t actually have a messiah. They have prophets and messengers but no one that is considered the son of God. Islam actually does believe that Jesus existed but do not believe he was the son of God. They believe he is a messenger of God just like Muhammed, just like Abraham and Moses were. On the other hand, in Buddhism, Buddha isn’t even considered a son of God or even a messenger of God. He is just a man who perfected himself through his philosophy. Buddhists, unlike the previously mentioned religions, don’t believe their way is the only way to salvation.
I don’t see how you can’t see that it is these religions, though not strait forward, that promote intolerance in the end. They cause the divisions we see among people even if most of their teachings are of peace and love. All it takes is a few lines or pages of a larger piece of work to change the overall affect it has on people and society. I know there will be divisions among people even without religion but those can be solved through rational thought while religion only can be proved by the text that form it and are discredited by opposing sides.
Nobodyspecial,
John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
In a nut shell, christians tend to "spread the good news", they want to get people to follow Jesus because it is the only way to God. They feel some sort of responsibility to tell people about Jesus, but that's just about as much as they can do.
With islam, they actually put it into action. It's their ultimate goal to have the world to submit to only islam. It's actually written in the koran.
Koran 9.29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
Now, speak to me about "intolerance".
Cheers :)
It's more unamerican to call people unamerican for expressing their freedom of speech than it is to disagree with the current government's policies. That's why freedom of speech is there and to try and limit the credibility of such things by calling them 'unamerican' is what is unamerican.
MissB: The Koran also says that anyone who kills an innocent person, believer or not, will never even smell paradise.
Bloc,
I've discussed this with SeanR before and i can't believe i'm going there again. Anyway, the abortion clinic bombers are a small friction of misguided christians compared to the radical muslims (I believe we agree on this one) and we don't condone anything they did. If anything, we condemn them. They're not different from the islamic suicide bombers. Also, gay haters and murderers are hardly in the same league, aren't they?
You specifically quoted the koran and the bible. I pointed out that the bible has the same kind of "kill the infidels" message in parts of it.
That's why I also said "IMO, the difference between islam and christians regarding intolerance would lie in the form of actions or lack thereof ..."
Can you honestly say that christians are so intolerant? Really? Let me refresh your memory. From the murder of Theo Van Gogh (submission movie), Hitoshi Iragasi (japanese translator of the book the satanic verses) to the fatwa call for death to Salman Rushdie to the cartoon riot all over the world, the pope remarks and so many others, can you still say that christians are the intolerant ones? Honestly?
Christianity has been bashed and "blasphemed" over and over again to some points that are beyond my comprehension, but do you see us burning and bombing buildings down, making death threats to others? Geez...
Like i said before, i think political correctness is BS. It doesn't work fairly. People bash christianity because we don't bite and we keep our heads down instead of stabbing you to death, strapping bombs to ourselves and "smiting your neck", so to speak. People are so afraid of "offending" muslims, so they turn their focus on something else. You gotta give it to the australians, though. They really take no bullshit from radical muslims.
The way I see it, you americans are pointing your gun to the wrong enemy. Dig deeper, you may see who the real enemy is.
Nobodyspecial,
Would you be kind enough to refer which verse in the koran that says that? I know that the koran and the bible both have verses that contradict each other. As you know, islam also refers to the Hadith as being as important as the koran itself. They're like the pillars of islam. One can't work without the other.
As for the koran, there are discrepancies in its verses. Like one time it says don't kill people but the other says kill the infidels. From what i gather, the don't kill part was written before mohammad gained political powers in Arabia and the kill part was written after.
[sigh] I could go on... :/
Cheers :)
missb: Check out this link. It's where I got most of my information about Islam.
Copsunited: Just to let you know I'm not a bible thumper. I'm actually an athiest.
The main reason you do not see the condemnation of violence by Muslim is either because you don't want to, don't look for it, or just because of your bias towards Christianity. Here are a few links: link one, link two, link three, link four, link five, and link six.
Our way of life isn't neccessarily Christian, it is freedom. Don't get them mixed around because I'm sure there are many Christians out there who would like to see all other ways of life sweeped out of this country. Intolerance goes hand and hand with religion.
Bloc,
You seem to be implying that islam, by it's nature is bad, because of the crazy islamists.
I live in the most populous muslim country in the world. I've met and known more muslims than you possibly have. They're wonderful people, they're my friends. Never that I think islam by nature was bad. It was just the wrong people using religion's name.
But then I read more, I dug deeper, from the biography of mohammad, the koran to the hadith and what's happened in the world. I put two and two together and came to the conclusion that it actually is bad by nature. But please remember, Islam and Muslims are two different things for me. I don't hate muslims at all, unless of course, the radicals/terrorists.
Try reading this and this and this.
Nobodyspecial,
The link you gave me, the one where you got most of the information about islam from USC is very likely to be funded by the rich muslims from arab nations. My recommended sites and yours are probably against each other because we may be biased. It seems like your sites are mostly defending islam and mine on the contrary. Please refer to my recommended sites I wrote above to bloc.
Cheers :)
"But real christians tend to live life by jesus' examples and teachings. Which is why we mostly refer to the new testament than the old testament."
Not all of the examples that bloc linked to were from the Old Testament. There were ones from the New Testament. Plus I remember when I still went to church when I was younger a pastor told me that no part of the Bible is above any other. They all are to be taken equally and what they say should still be applied today. Also I know that you mentioned that there is almost two different personalities displayed by Muhammad in the Koran, one seems to be the peaceful side and the other seems to be the vengeful/radical side. I can see the same difference in the Old and New Testament in the Bible. The main difference that I can see between the two faiths is that Christianity has already matured past the point of violence in converting non-believers and Islam has not.
Thanks for pointing out that link to faith freedom. I looked through them too quick the first time and the bias in the other ones stood out to me.
"You're supposed to be the ones who gather all facts, put two and two together and understand the difference between Christianity and Islam by facts"
Normally atheists don't try and point out the differences between religions, rather than that usually they try and point out the irrationality of them. A site that I often visit that does just that is The Secular Web. This site's aim is to remove religion from the government (allowing true separation of Church and State) and to promote a naturalistic view of the world.
I think the main point Bloc and I both were trying to make is that even though Islam has its bad side it does have its good side just like Christianity has a bad side and a good side. I know the bad side of Islam does stand out more than that of Christianity, but it doesn't mean that Christianity is all good either.
Bloc & Nobody,
Geez....noone said that all christians are good. Who said that? I didn't. I swear :) So what the hell have we been debating about? Hmm...I wonder :/
Anyway,
Bloc,
about pat robertson, that's not "real" christianity. That's why i said "Real Christians" in the first place. And i'm not trying to compare the best of christianity to the worst of islam, because there's nothing to compare :) It’s like this, action speaks louder than words, yes? Comparing the bible and koran, those are just ‘theories” so to speak. But what’s most important is what the people put in practice.
History has taught us a lot of things and I think we all agree that christianity has matured.
Nobody,
Yes, the FFI website is not biased to christianity. The islamreview I must admit that it is, though.
So anyway, I guess this is it. We've finally found a common ground. I can't believe it! :)
Cheers!
Bloc,
Right. Ok... Did it ever occur to you that those muslim terrorists/extremists are perhaps the "real" muslims? Those who actually do what their prophet and holy book tell them to do?
See, when you compare the lives of Jesus and Mohammad, you can see the difference. Mohammad was a war god, so to speak. It's all about politics. He spread his religion through invasion, by the sword. He was nobody before he married Khadijah, his first wife. She's a very powerful woman and very rich. After he married her, he started gaining political powers. God, I'm really putting my neck on the line here if i go on.
So the point is, I'm not comparing the best of christians to the worst of muslims. I'm merely comparing the lives of each respective prophet.
Cheers!