According to Politico.com, all active ethics probes, by the House ethics committee, focus on black lawmakers ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091103/pl_politico/29055
This is an outrage. They should haul some innocent white people in and charge them with ethics violations in order to balance out these investigations.
Of course, they could just ignore the race of people doing bad things and probe away just on the basis of the charges.
No, no, no. That would be unethical in itself. We must consider race and make sure as many whites are probed as blacks even if there are no whites that need probing.
Hmmm. I wonder if all the black people being probed are also Democrats. How can this be? Could there be a pattern other than the fact that they are black, like the fact that they are unethical Democrats that just happen to be black? That seems a little far fetch, but there could be something there.
I wonder how criminals are being handled these days outside of Washington. What if all bank robbers caught are black? Do they have to go out and arrest some innocent white people to balance things out? Or do they have to let some of the bank robbers go.
Here is a thought, just a suggestion. What say we just go after bad people no matter what their skin color. You know, just ignore that altogether. If someone is a slime bag or a bank robber, just probe and prosecute them without even considering their color.
OK, OK. I know that sounds way too politically incorrect and logical. What was I thinking?
