GnawingDog reads (1):
Who's reading GnawingDog (3):

HR 3200’s “public option” will not resemble Medicare

Posted by Andrew Coates MD on Sunday, Sep 13, 2009

By Kip Sullivan, JD

Advocates of a “public option” claim that the “option” will look like Medicare. They say this about the “option” in both bills that have been introduced to date – the House “reform” bill, HR 3200, and the bill written by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) committee. But this statement is not true.

Medicare is larger than any private insurance company; the “option” in both bills will be small. The traditional Medicare program is a single program with uniform benefits; the “option” in both bills will be a balkanized program that may not be available in all parts of the country. Medicare is administered by public employees; the “options” in both bills will be administered by private-sector corporations, some or all of which will be insurance companies. The “option” in neither bill resembles Medicare.

The rest.

Source: PNHP's Official Blog


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comment on "HR 3200’s “Public Option” Will Not Resemble Medicare."

public option (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)