• SeanRenaud said on Oct 09, 2009....

  LoL.  You're an idiot.  I keep forgetting.  Please shut up, the sane are trying to regain some control in this country and we can't with you idiots undermining us

• GANK said on Oct 10, 2009....

  Is that the best that you can come up with?   Or maybe you're the type that is so inclined to talk in circles and participate in philosophies that are proven time and time again as wishful thinking rather than what has been time tested.  Let's keep in mind who's who here.  It appears to me that you're unsure on how the simple arithmetic must add up no matter how complex the calculus may be.

  You claim that the sane are trying to regain control of the country?  So much that they have to deny the public a chance to read the bill  or else they will lose it.   Then we are finding out about czars being admitted communists. Also, the same sane people compare today's protesters to the played out nazis?  Let's not forget that when there were war protesters during the Bush years, these same folks that are branding swastikas on the protesters today were labeling the anti-war protesters as "patriotic".  So go ahead,  educate the idiot.  Or are you only capable of telling one just "that "he's wrong, rather than "why" he's wrong which only amounts to a true idiot questioning the intel of someone who looks at both sides of the coin before he flips it?  I know...I know what you're thinking: "Don't confuse me with the facts.......my mind is made up!"  Yep, you shut me up.

   

   

• SeanRenaud said on Oct 10, 2009....

  Look.  I'll make you a deal.  When you have say 25 readers I'll respect you as a clown ant not just an idiot.  It won't actualy change you from being an idiot but I'll pretend.

• GANK said on Oct 11, 2009....

  Now look, I For one) am all about generating discussion in my more serious and in-depth blogs.  But this one was all about casting fun at an already existing farce.  And then there are those who take it personally and try to project college level intel with first grade comebacks.

  Now that you've shown your ass (Not that it's the first time) by punching keys that only tells me that you are  Stuart Smalley when the other listening head is knodding, but as soon as it starts shaking, you immediately become Barney Frank.  So, despite both the laws of physics as well as the natural order of things, you're convinced that the eagle can only fly with every feather on it's left wing.

  As for mself, I read through the blogs and view both sides of the aisle.  That is why I believe that if not for the tail feathers (Independants) the bird will crash and burn into the first obstacle in front of it.

  These are the swing voters and both major parties have to work hard to thoroughly convince them before they steer left or right (Depending upon which direction is warranted as well as bring about balance.)

  But no matter how much I disagree with someone, I will not comment on any blog with what's mentally equivalent to "Your Mama wears army boots".  If I believe it to be silly, I waste no time in answering it, yet if it's worthy of discussion, I treat it as such.

  In your case, you appear to be quite arrogant, but at the same time lack any asset that I may envy.  I have a difficult time respecting grown-ups that mimic my little sister when someone did so much as poke fun at The New Kids On The Block.

  Come-backs that amount to "You're an idiot" and "Shutup" seem to tell me that you cannot come up with anything , yet cannot help but put in your two cents for the sake of the last word no matter how simple-minded it may be.  Or better yet, you may be leaning on the blogosphere  as a way of venting support or opposition without anyone having a physical description of who the idiot truly is at your keyboard.  This means taking comfort in the idea of it being unnecessary to lock eyes and expose body language in a debate.

  So, personally, I find it necessary to block you, being that you are only capable of redundancy.  I am not concerned about how many readers you may have, Squidward Tentacles.  This is not one of my life's major goals.

Comment on "Nobel peace committee must be drunk"

Currently tagged	Obama politics philosophy liberals conservatives Libertarians (Click to add tags below)
Tag this post	(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Your comment
	Comment Anonymously