ALIENated's tags:

Some think I am wrong about Obama not being a black man, that he is more white than black. I am not arguing that he has white features. I am just amused that he is passing for black (because of his features) when he is, in fact, mostly white.

That just symbolizes, to me, what Obama is all about. He appears to be a black man, but he is actually mostly caucasian (50 percent because of his mother). He pretends to know what needs to be done, but he actually has no experience other than running for office and some community organizing. He has never run a state or even been a senator for very long. While he was a senator, he voted "present" more often than "yes" or "no". Presidents cannot vote "present". They have to make hard decisions.

Bush made hard decisions that often seemed wrong to Monday morning quarterbacks like bloc and Jon Stewart, but at least he made decisions. Obama, as Saturday Night Live recently pointed out, has done nothing so far other than giving away billions of dollars to his supporters, to those who voted for him, while the leftist media looks the other way.

Bush went into Iraq and removed a worthless, murdering dictator who supported terrorists and terrorist activity, while Obama cozies up to terrorist dictators and panders to them for approval. How is being in Afghanistan any different than being in Iraq? We have just been suckered into the same quagmire that Russia was sucked into for so many years. I say, crap or get off the pot. Kick ass or get out.

Oh, I forgot. Obama is not capable of making a decision. I wonder if he will go on the road again and stage some town hall meetings to pretend to get approval for what he is doing in Afghanistan, if he ever does make a decision. He has to learn to make decisions, especially about foreign affairs, and then live with the consequences, as Bush did.

I do not want him to make bad decisions, but I am not sure he can help it. It is hard to do the right thing when your supporters would not know the right thing to do if it ran over them like a truck. How can anyone who has a head full of crap, put there by the likes of leftist, radical Bill Ayers and racist, bigot Reverend Wright, make good decisions?

I almost wish I could be put in suspended animation until the 2010 elections are over. I pray that enough Republican congressmen will be elected in 2010 to neutralize Mr. Obama, just as Clinton was neutralized after two years.

Of course, I fear that he will luck into making a few good decisions, which might cause that 2010 Republican take-back of congress not to occur. I am starting to better understand the old saying "damned if you do or damned if you don't".

I suppose my prayer should be that the American people wake up to what is happening, that they get rid of this bunch in 2010 even if they get lucky for the next year or so. Two years after that, it may be a mute point. By then, this super majority of Democrats / Socialists will probably have changed the Constitution to allow Mr. Obama unlimited terms in office, and no telling what else.



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • CreativeWoman said on Oct 08, 2009....
    Congress is where the balance of power is right now.  When it gets lopsided with either party it becomes far too partisan.

    That's my two cents.

    CW
  • ALIENated said on Oct 08, 2009....

    Hey, I was only offering a penny for your thoughts. I made a penny. Pay up.

    Yes, you are right. I was just in the car listening to Hannity. He was talking to some Republican (he sounded familiar, but I cannot think of his name). They were talking about how the Democrats / Socialists are refusing to post the new legislation online in time for The People to read it before they try to railroad it through. If it is that bad, and they know people are going to find fault with it, why would they want to ram it through? Because they are a bunch of power grabbing halfwits. They are like a bunch of little kids following the "it is easier to get forgiveness than to get permission" rule. However, we are not talking about sneaking off to the movies. We are talking about a massive government takeover of one-fifth of the U.S. economy. If that happens, it will soon be harder to see a doctor than it is to get a flu shot. Medicare costs ten times what they projected it to cost. Will we ever learn?

  • CreativeWoman said on Oct 08, 2009....
    Put it on my tab.  lol

    I do agree with you about this ludicrous not reading legislation before they vote on it.  That makes absolutely no sense.  You can't run a business that way, let alone a country.

    Hannity is a little lopsided for me, but I have watched him a few times. BTW, what happened to the guy that was on there with him?  Too liberal?

    CW
  • ALIENated said on Oct 08, 2009....

    Alan Colmes, I think it was. I think they were spending all their time shouting at each other. Too much like MSNBC. I am not Hannity's biggest fan. I usually listen to Michael Medved on another channel if I am out and about, which is about the only time I listen to any of them.

  • CreativeWoman said on Oct 08, 2009....
    I really hate how a lot of those pontiffs shout and or talk over one another.  About the only political show I watch with any regularity is the one George Stephanopolis hosts on Sunday mornings.  He seems to be very level headed and analytical.

    CW 
  • ALIENated said on Oct 08, 2009....

    Yep, I like him pretty well and his program. I usually forget to watch it though.

  • dyingman said on Oct 09, 2009....

    he is passing for black (because of his features) when he is, in fact, mostly white.

    It's hard to comprehend what a jackass you are.  Because of his features and maybe his skin tone!  The man is dark.  Not as dark as possible, but plenty dark enough to earn him unexplainable hatred by an awful lot of worthless crackers.

    he is actually mostly Caucasian (50 percent because of his mother).

    Mostly?  His dad was Kenyan.  He's 50% black.  Does that make him MOSTLY black.  Do numbers mean anything to conservatives?  Is that why Dubya never liked benchmarks during the Iraq war.  It involved all them numbers and countin' and stuff.


    He pretends to know what needs to be done, but he actually has no experience

    He has never run a state or even been a senator for very long.

    19 out of 44 presidents have been governors.  (That's less than 50% if the numbers scare you, big guy.  You might even say MOST presidents never run a state.)  As opposed to George Bush who made those tough decisions that were total Charlie Foxtrots.  He was a governor.  Fat lot of good it did us.  Carter was a governor.  After the SALT talks and brokering the ONLY middle east peace deal ever in just four years, I think he did well, but most conservatives tell me he's awful.  On the other side, I suppose you think George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry Truman were shlubs, huh?  None were governors.  Especially Lincoln, who was a Congressman for two years before he became president.  No wonder he was so clueless!

    While he was a senator, he voted "present" more often than "yes" or "no".

    You are referring to his STATE senator career.  Get schooled by a Republican:

    Rep. Bill Black (R-104th dist., Danville) agreed that the present vote is greatly misunderstood by the rest of the country. "We are one of the few states that still has it," Black said. (It's been on the books since 1931.) "I have used it, but sparingly."

    He described a case of when it's appropriate: "When a veterans' rights benefits bill comes up, but attached to it is an amendment with a 10 1/2% salary increase, well there's a problem there. I'm for the veterans' benefits, but against the salary increase. I could have voted present, but in that case I just voted no. But there were several who voted present on that bill."

    For the rest:
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/

    This is a page debunking the canard when Hilary Clinton used it.  (I had no idea you two thought so much alike!)

    Once you understand the Illinois voting system (reading would help, talk radio leaves out stuff that doesn't fit their picture of the world), 130 Present votes sound a little LOW considering he voted on 4000 measures in that time. 

    Oh crap.  Numbers again. 

    He voted YEA or NAY a pantload more than 50% of the time.  (more than 96% for those of you who aren't a-feared of math.)


    Bush made hard decisions that often seemed wrong to Monday morning quarterbacks

    Um, it's Saturday night and it still looks like George Bush's decisions were really really bad.  What were the GOOD ones?  Share with the group, shall we?


    as Saturday Night Live recently pointed out,

    Oh.  Well, if SNL says it...   I had you pegged for a Fox News kinda guy.  Live and learn.  Weekend Update is your most trusted source.

  • dyingman said on Oct 09, 2009....

    Bush went into Iraq and removed a worthless, murdering dictator who supported terrorists and terrorist activity,

    Yes.  And then he stayed there for 6 more years.  He might have removed a lot more dictators instead of wasting a trillion bucks if that was his real goal.  

    WHO could have known Iraq would become a quagmire?  Time to get schooled by a Republican again.  A guy you'd think Bush would have listened to:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I

    Maybe Saddam shouldn't have been removed?  Was this one of the tough decisions?  Do you ever come up for air when your head is buried in whatever bullshit you watch/listen to? 


    How is being in Afghanistan any different than being in Iraq?

    It's not.  Let's see if he figures it out before 6 years are up. 

    We have just been suckered into the same quagmire that Russia was sucked into for so many years. I say, crap or get off the pot. Kick ass or get out.

    I agree.  But if a Democrat said this, he'd be accused of letting al-queda have a safe haven, Defeatocrat tool!   I'm right, aren't I?

     He has to learn to make decisions, especially about foreign affairs, and then live with the consequences, as Bush did.

    LIVING with the decisions was hard for a lot of our warriors.  So far, Obama's decisions have been a lot easier to live with for all parties concerned.  But the term is still young.  He might pooch things.

    I pray that enough Republican congressmen will be elected in 2010 to neutralize Mr. Obama, just as Clinton was neutralized after two years.

    Pray hard.   It's almost mathematically impossible.  You see, there are 435 Congressmen and...  oh, what the hell.  I forgot who I was talking to.

    Um, forget it, Congress is Democratic the way Obama is white.  Does that clear things up any?  Dang, it's hard work learning to speak "whackjob".


    By then, this super majority of Democrats / Socialists

    Republicans are more socialist than the Democrats.   Bush nationalized the banks.


    For the love of all that's holy.  If you read ALIENated's posts and agree with them, ask a trusted Libertarian friend.  (They tend to have a good grasp of the lies both parties tell, and no I'm not a Libertarian.)
  • javadewd said on Oct 10, 2009....
    Okay, who pissed in dyingman's coffee again... I'm telling you, this guy is way too bitter.

    Oh, wait... It's Bush's fault... Again... Sigh.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 10, 2009....

    Someone check his Wheaties. I think those raisins might be weavels.

    I am not sure where to start on all that. Here is some homework: do a little research and answer your own questions.

    For example, Obamas father was a little bit Kenyan and a lot Arabic. So Obama is more caucasian than anything. It does not matter, but it is like women being proud that a female runner won the Olympics, but the female runner was actually a man who had had a sex change.

    And numbers mean something to me. I have a masters degree in mathematics. But that is just me. Not all conservatives are as educated as I am.

    Republicans are more socialist than the Democrats. Bush nationalized the banks.

    Wow, I think if anyone nationalized any banks, that would be Obama, Pelossi, and Reid. Bush tried to bail them out, which was no doubt the idea of Pelossi and Reid and the Democrat / Socialist congress that was elected in 2006. (Bush just wanted to get our guys out of the Middle Each safely, so he needed their funding support.) If not for people like Carter, Clinton, Chris Dodd, and Barney Frank, there would not have been a bail out.

    Whackjob? Let me try to answer you the way Robert Gibbs, Obama's Press Secretary would: I know you are, but what am I?

    Dude, you really need to stop watching MSNBC and CNN. Maybe you are pissed that you are not getting free healthcare. Once Obama gets through with our healthcare system, you will be doing good to get healthcare at all. That is just my opinion of course based on the fact that numbers are important to me, and I can add two plus two and get four.

  • javadewd said on Oct 10, 2009....
    Whoa, wait a tick there dude. That African woman who won the Olympics didn't have a sex change. She was born XY and her folks (or the doctor?) made a wrong move and snipped her winky and raised her as XX. That shit goes on too much in this country, too, just ask my wife. She sees it constantly in the Pediatric Operating Rooms. There was no mid-life crisis.

    The first TARP was a under-handed tactic orchestrated by the Fed. Some damn 1930's progressive law that said the Fed could basically ask for whatever they wanted during a period of "crisis." It tied everybody's hands. It was a fucked-up deal. Why Obama decided to exploit such a bad idea is beyond my comprehension.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 10, 2009....

    A n d, look at Obama's past history and his associates and mentors along the way. If any Republican had a past anything like Obama's, he would not even get out of the gate. Obama is like a mirror. Liberals look at him and see themselves, they see what they want to see, and he knows that. He tries to be all things to all people. He tries to buy friends ... literally. I respect Bush because he made hard decisions (lika a man, like a father, like a commander in cheif) and he lived by those decisions no matter how armchair quarterbacks second guessed him and no matter how the liberal media slandered him (where as Obama gets a free ride from the liberal media). Obama is an inexperienced, politically correct oaf.

    === Read this to better understand liberals ===

  • javadewd said on Oct 10, 2009....
    Oh, I agree that Obama has been given a "privileged" status due to the fact that he appears as black as the ace of spades, even though he didn't even know he was black until he arrived in Chicago and figured out that he could exploit that fact. His level of narcissism should be honored with a big golden statue paid for by his enemies (47%+ of the American people), not that they are so much "against" him as he is completely against them.

    Much like a defiant little girl, the "cute" wears off after a while and the ugly defiant bitch will soon surface to much pomp and fanfare... Or his demise, but we'll see.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 13, 2009....

    I do not hate Obama. I hate his philosophy, his plans for America. I hate that people are projecting their thoughts on him as if he shares them and stands for what they stand for. I think people are slowly waking up to what they have done. In their hatred for George W. Bush (largely fueled by a completely biased left-wing media), they have allowed a Trojan Horse to be wheeled into our courtyard. Hopefully, they are recognizing the enemies of America that are now pouring out of it almost daily. They have to strike in the dark of night (the healthcare legislation is a perfect example) before people know what hit them. People stand on the wall, looking outward for the enemy. But the enemy is already in our midst. You invited them in.

  • noparty said on Oct 14, 2009....
    My big problem with Obama is not the fact he is half black, it is the fact he never recognizes that he is half white.  I always hear him say how proud he is of his black heritage, well and good, but why isn't he equally proud of his white heritage?.  Now if I have missed something and someone has heard him praise his white heritage as much as his black, please correct me without calling me filthy names.  If possible cite a few occasions.  I honestly have heard him mention his mother but once, while I have heard him brag on his dad many times. 
  • ALIENated said on Oct 14, 2009....

    He probably knows that is what will get the votes from blacks and guilt-ridden liberal whites. I do not care what his heritage is. I just think it is comical that so much is made of him being a black man when he is so little black.

    And I was not alluding to the African guy / gal. I could have said liberals are like someone bragging on their toaster and they actually have a blender. I remember seeing black people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton almost in tears when it became obvious that Obama was elected. "The first black president", they said. Not really.

  • noparty said on Oct 15, 2009....
    I also don't like the fact he said we were not a Christian nation.  I happen to think we are more Christian than any other religion.  I also did not like the way he bowed to the Saudi king and went around apologizing for us to the entire world.  I haven't seen any muslim nation apologize for 9-11.  He has turned out to be much worse than I thought he would be. 
  • ALIENated said on Oct 15, 2009....

    Right, right, and right. This is a predominately Christian nation, but, in fairness, I think that was just his way of saying we are not JUST a Christian nation, that we believe in freedom of religion, unlike most Muslim nations liks Saudi Arabia. Only a fool would not know that this nation was founded by Christians on Christian principles, and most of those principles are also held by other religions as well. As far as the aplolgizing, that was his problem. I feel that America has nothing to apologize for. We were attacked on 9/11 and the nations that support terrorism and harbor terrorists are paying for it. Obama is only getting started. His ineptness and inexperience will have more and more agreeing with you ... that he has turned out to be much worse than you thought he would be. I dare say you have seen nothing yet.

Comment on "Crap Or Get Off The Pot"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

Science and propaganda merge in global warming "debate."...

Even Chris Mathews at MSNBC is starting to question Obama.

...
Oooh, Sunday was a red letter day!...