It took me a long time. About fifty years.
I was young once and during that time I had all the answers. Why couldn't everyone else see it? There was a black and white answer for all moral, ethical, and political questions. There was right and there was wrong. In my forties I came to the realization there was definitely a gray area, and I do not mean solely on my head.
I found I wasn't always right. I found I was rarely right (meaning correct) thinking black and white. The reason for this was , lo and behold, I placed myself on the 'other' side in my thought and found in different opinions a great amount of wisdom, a truth that was hidden from me.
I found that the word 'liberal' wasn't a word directly from satan. I found that 'their truth' could be not only incorporated into my thinking, but accepted as moral and humane. Most of all, I found as I have said many times before on this site, 'if you do not understand both sides to every issue, you have no opinion'. And it became one of the three postulates I live by.
I was a republican and right of center conservative. I still have several conservative values, but am no longer republican. Nor am I democrat even though I changed my voting card to democrat due to george bush and buddies.
You see, mostly in the first fifty years to now, I had free and total health care. I was happy and my family was covered. I always had a job and worked hard. I had a way to plan easily for retirement, the company did it for me. My daughter never needed an abortion. Life was good and anyone who didn't have what I did just didn't work for it. It's easy to think like this when you are a republican conservative.
Slowly, over the years, I came to realize everything I had was not supplied by 'my kind'. My working conditions, my vacation time, my health care, my wages, my retirement, my very security existed due to unions. So did everyone else's. Would republicans have provided any of this? In a pig's butt.
I noticed minimum wages (such as they are) were all provided by democrats after battle with republicans and it did not decimate small business, at all. I noticed social security was democrat (after battle) and reps like it now. I noticed medicare was provided by democrats (after battle) and reps love it now. They say it's the way we should go.
There was something else I noticed. Conservative groups were not always right and liberal groups were not always wrong, and vice-versa. Let me take the ACLU for example. This was an exceptionally dirty four letters for me for many years. I still get a little miffed at them.
The ACLU isn't really a force for civil liberties, it is a force for the 1st amendment. They protect free speech and press. As a young man what I didn't fully understand is you cannot pick and choose who to protect in order to protect a right. I didn't understand that everyone must have it or no one has it. They must protect the one's you don't like in order to protect your right.
In all my views on tv and reading, I have never found one constitutional scholar regardless of liberalism or conservatism state you can pick and choose who is protected. They usually use the example of 'the camel getting his nose under the tent'. Pretty soon the whole camel is in the tent and you lose the tent.
A friend the other day who is a Phd. in mass communications, sent me an article about the ACLU defending a gun owner. She did this because I told her I had never seen them defending right to bear arms. It was over free speech...but still...
They also defend people all over the country who cannot afford a lawyer in cases you would agree with. And they are stretched thin doing this.
Now to get to my point of this post. My point is 'reasonable thought'. One of my favorite words in the language is simply 'reasonable'. And it is reasonable to think that no group, no party, and actually not that many individual people - are reasonable - in all issues.
This is far more difficult than most believe.
If you are religious can you be reasonable about your beliefs? Can you keep them in your family, or your person, or your church? Are you capable of realizing your beliefs may be wrong for others, or just plain wrong? Do you realize your religion must not control government?
If you are a democrat or republican do you realize your party cannot be right all the time? That both are heavily controlled by interests of money, especially in the banking and corporate world? Is it possible for you to discern when it is the interest of them alone and not your family or the good for all?
Is it possible for you to know when an environmental group may have a valid point? Or the ACLU may have a valid point?
It is one of the necessities in life that we must have special interests. Even bankers and corporations. Even the ACLU and PETA.
This is where we come in on reasonable thought. Special interests are the watchdogs of our society. We must have them. The problem is their interest is their bible. And none of them are right all the time.
We must discern.
If we attack any one all the time, we are wrong part of the time.
If we use reasonable thought all the time, chances are most of us will find the excesses, the lies, the greed, and act accordingly.
But if you are religious can you side with the atheist when they are right?
If you are republican can you side with democrats when they are right?
If you are democrat can you side with the republicans when they are right?
Most of all we must not forget the last sentence of the Gettysburg Address :
"-that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and that government, of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
The "under God" part does not bother me in the least even though I am agnostic. I don't mind at all that "in God we trust" is on our coins and currency. It kind of makes me feel good.
It is "of the people, by the people, for the people" that bothers me. Many of us are losing sight of this part. Our rights wither like a fall leaf. So many are no longer for the people, especially our so-called leaders in every aspect of government, finance, and lawmaking.
Can we discern?
Are we capable of finding the culprits in any idealogy, even ours, through reasonable thought?
Can you listen to the other party and their media voices and find something of value?
Can you learn about special interest groups, find what they are really about, and support them when they are right regardless of their name?
Do you take the time to find balance between sides from all that is said?
If you do not, you have no opinion. Or at least one that means anything. No one can make a reasonable decision with only fifty per cent of the knowledge. You must be capable of hearing both sides and finding where true value lies.
Nothing else is reasonable. Nothing else is right.
If we do not do this, the people will not win as Lincoln wanted.
The biggest lie will win, the most money supporting the biggest lie will win.
And you lose.



