ALIENated's tags:

I was thinking today, government interference is like in a sci fi movie when someone goes back in time and does one little thing that screws up the future. A good example is the Ashton Kutcher movie Butterfly Effect. The Back To The Future movies also dealt with the same problem.

When government interferes, it is more like the elephant effect or the bull in a china closet effect. They do not just change one little thing, they make more changes than anyone can even read, or will read. So how can they know what their stupidity is going to do to our future? They do not even know what is in their stupid legislation.

If one little bit of interference can totally screw up the future, imagine what all the big changes they are making can do. Back during the Carter years, they thought they could force the issue of housing so that everyone could buy a house WHETHER THEY COULD PAY FOR IT OR NOT. That sounds like a good cause, right? Wrong. If anyone can qualify for a house, guess what, the demand for houses goes up. And guess what, the price of houses also goes up because of a little thing called supply and demand. (See "When You Reward Failure" for more about that.)

I figure the Butterfly Effect is the reason government gets us in so much trouble. Thinking that the next group of politicians is going to get us in less trouble than the last group of politicians is the stupid effect. Meaning we have to be stupid if we believe that.

Election after election we keep voting for people who are going to do this and are going to change that. We are stupid. We need to vote for people who are not going to do anything, except maybe let us spend our own hard earned money.

But we have too many people who can vote that do not even have or make any money. So what are they going to do? They are going to vote for the best liar, the guy that makes the best claims about giving them something for nothing. You know, like Obama did.

As I understand it, our government is now being funded by less than 50 percent of the people, and the majority of the funding comes from an even smaller group than that. Is that taxation without representation or what?

When I am king, I will pass a law that says each vote will be weighted by the amount of income tax that person pays each year. Do you think politicians would not change their tune if that was the rule? We have deadbeats and illegal immigrants who contribute nothing positive to our society determining our future by electing idiots like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama.

At the very least, you should not get to vote if you did not pay any income tax in the last year before an election unless you had a damn good reason (too old, disabled, etc.) not to.

Why do we expect politicians to act rationally when they are elected by a bunch of people who just want a handout from the government? Let me see, people that want something from the government elected me last time, what should I do while in office.

It makes me sick when people talk about Republicans catering to the big corporations and rich people. SO FUCKING WHAT? Those companies and rich people are the ones that keep us all employed. Maybe you are noticing that right about now. Ronald Reagan was absolutely right: real wealth trickles down and so does the lack of wealth.

Idiots like Obama think that the government can somehow get involved and spread the wealth around. Bullchips. That is not the way it works. If people and companies are not free to make a big profit they are not going to be around for long or employ people for long. Maybe you are noticing that right about now as well.

If you head toward Mars and your path is off by an inch, you will miss Mars by miles and miles (you do the math). It is the same thing when government gets involved in things it should not get involved in. We need to stop electing people who promise us tax hikes, handouts, and more and more legislation. If a politician says they are going to do anything other than provide a strong military and build roads and bridges, do not give them your vote. They are part of the Stupid Effect. They are the ones that are going to cause us to miss our goal by miles and miles and miles.



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • javadewd said on Sep 09, 2009....
    Ashton Kutcher... What a douche bag... He is the poster child for the stupid effect!
  • Twylarants said on Sep 09, 2009....
    Don't settle for being king, Alien...Emperors have much more power.


      
  • ALIENated said on Sep 09, 2009....

    It is sad what the two party system has gotten us into. We have candidates that have to support all the crap their party backs or they have little chance of making it into office. Each party has some good aspects and some bad aspects, but it is getting harder and harder for candidates to just pick the good things from each side. I think that is why Obama is having such a hard time. He does not really agree with some of the Democrat Party baloney, like homo marriage, and he is even left of many Democrats. He was a "lessor of two evils" president and he thinks he has a mandate, which he does not. He is like the guy that the cute cheerleader goes out with in order to make her real boyfriend mad. America is more conservative than liberal and the vast majority of Americans, including most Democrats, do not want Socialism. Obama's healthcare "reform" is just a power grab for more government control over our lives. We have a Cadillac that needs to be repaired, not replaced with a moped. Comparing the healthcare system to the post office or the military is stupid and dishonest. Saying we all ready have socialized medicine (Medicare, Medicaid, VA) because we chose to help those who can no longer help themselves (older people and disabled veterans) is also hishonest. As I have said before, people on the street (and at town hall meetings) have better ideas for reforming and fixing our healthcare system than most politicians seem to have. Politicians are not thinking of Joe the Plumber or Joe Q. Public. They are thinking of those who will fund their next campaign so they can make more rules that hurt you and me and help their supporters. Capitialism should be about making money if you are productive, not buying politicians to promote your agenda.

  • noparty said on Sep 09, 2009....
    I use to vote and strove to make decisions on who I thought would do the right thing for the country.  After eleven presidential elections our country has regressed not progressed.  Which political party bears the responsibility?  I say both are equally guilty for the sorry state this country finds itself in.  You continually attack socialism.  I don't think its so bad when it is blended in with capitalism, which is what has been happening since 1930.  The truth is its not the ism its the people running the ism and the people who continue to vote idiots into office from both parties.  I wish I knew the answer, but I don't, but I do know one thing, I will never waste my valuable time again by voting for a republican or democrat. 
  • ALIENated said on Sep 09, 2009....

    Like many of us have stated, we often vote AGAINST someone instead of FOR someone. I would rather have seen a polar bear be president than John Kerry or Al Gwhore. Much of what happens depends on the House and Senate make up. Clinton was not so bad after Newt and the Republicans took the House and Senate over again. A Republican House and Senate and a Democrat president might be the best combination. As far as Socialism creeping in since the 1930s, you can blame that on Democrats like FDR, LBJ, and Jimmy Carter. Plus, our involvement in the Middle East is more the doing of Jimmy Carter than the doing of George Dubya ...

    In 1980, President Jimmy Carter enunciated what would become known as the "Carter Doctrine": that Persian Gulf oil was "vital" to American national interests and that the U.S. would use "any means necessary, including military force" to sustain access to it. To assure that "access," he announced the creation of a Rapid Deployment Joint Task Force, a new military command structure that would be able to deliver personnel from all the armed services, together with state-of-the-art military equipment, to any location in the Middle East at top speed.

    Bush was just following through on a Democrat's policy. Our current financial crisis was also birthed in the Carter years. The Democrats thought it was a good idea to let people buy houses they could not afford and our banks had to make the best of it. Another Democrat idea that is basically "bend over and the government will poke it to you and you will like it".

    I fault the Republicans for not being more conservative on issues. They get in office and let Democrats tell them what to do, with the help of most of the TV news networks, even if they know better. Bush did little of what he promised in his campaign. And to pull the amnesty deal for illegal immigrants, that was unbelievable. Running McCain was the final slap in the face of conservative Republicans. The 2008 election was a choice between an old, white liberal and a younger, blackish liberal / Socialist. What a great choice when the nation is primarily conservative. No wonder there are so many pissed off people around today. The majority of the nation was left with no real choice. So we are seeing the tyranny of the minority.

  • bhalah said on Sep 09, 2009....
    - We have deadbeats, and illegal inmigrants who contribute.....
     
    - In 1980, president Jimmy Carter... The persian Gulf oil was vital...military forces to sustain access to it... New military comand structure
     
    - Democrats thought it was good idea to let people by houses, they could not aford, and the bank...
     
    -Amnesty deal for illegal inmigrants..
     
    - Blackish liberal / Socialist. What a great choise, when the nation is primarily conservative..
     
    - Pissed off people around... So we are seeing the tyranny of the minority...
     
    Honestly, i guet impress for thouse words, i can see a bit, or in my ourn, exactly the problem is, As i made this list, i found plenty answear, as your inconform whit the new governament of USA, and i understan the answear around, to my small point of you, Dear Alien, i persive a litle ould touls, so then the people want same change, I just want to tell you, that from a side, whear i am, Europe, you are talking abaut problems, are hapen in plenty all of the other countrys, you are talking abaut a mayority of conservatives, but all are dealing, whith ilegal inmigrants, amnesty, hypotecas, plus much mony run away, by new structure military comand, where the oil is runing away, and the banks give all the mony to the people can not afford, us you can see the mony, if it was a tipe of energy, just to joke, isent a good way run that energy, sory my english is not good, a bit desequilibrate, so they call crisis, but is not. Is a rethinking haw to make the mony run freely, equilibrate, and whith a good resoult, you talk abaut inmigrants, i can said theres a desequilibrate, clases, richs are the employers, but richs can not see them mony can run asweall, so they dont want to spend, they clouse them busines, couse theres les mony around, its the psicological mesage, so all react, this is your screem, but i would said, that theres a change becoming, as a political, but more in the future, this is a real dificoult time, and then my last joke, isent jhon lenon i belive, even if i smoke same grace, is the health sistem you are against? or is the income tax, maybe rich people they have to pay...where i live for example is plenty mony coming from the parlament european, the parlament european, has lot of coutrys who give them aporte, Is not that Obama is a blackish liberal, is that he is dealing whit europeans too, the countrys, trying to go to a way of closer sistem all of them, as a future resoult... Dont want to make a mees, i just want to said, that for my small point, is a global change, USA is also involved. we have to have a positive way of wieu, couse theres not mony to afford military new comands, hope sow..
  • bhalah said on Sep 09, 2009....
    by the way, is not Obama shouds i want to be, but a finger at the European Parlament, i would love, just to hier what they said, i need a waitreising job there...
  • ALIENated said on Sep 09, 2009....

    Do you speak Spanish? If not, what? I cannot quite figure out what you are saying. Sorry.

  • bhalah said on Sep 10, 2009....
    dont worry, Alien, i know is not easy to understan me, but belive me is not such confuce what i said, can not put in another words, but enyway, i just wanted to said, from another side, whithout knolich... i know..., but just intuitive, ..make dont understan of course, so then, the stupid effect, but i dont think i am stupid, as i dont think you are sameone you can not tolerate me, sorry if i let mi ignorance go ahead, but no one bad intettion.,... yes i write in spanglish.  Have a good day, Sr.
  • bhalah said on Sep 10, 2009....
    But i going to explain you eny way...
     
    I wanted to said , theres a lot of mony, invested in a wrong ways, lot mony, the governaments bad deals, plus in hands people can not afford.
     
    The world, is trying to make a chance, to make global rules, so each country is having political problems inside.
     
    We are in a new era of governants.quiet quick way to a socialism sistem it seems,  plenty are agree, plenty are not.
     
    Just be worry, of your ourn itch, dasent mean others are dyeing for cancer.
     
    I dont want to think theres partys who want the exterminium of the people in poverty, ¿ who is going to to the hard work, then.?..so, what is the part you dont understan.
     
    Is this my stupid effect? of your writing?
  • ALIENated said on Sep 10, 2009....

    If you are saying that the world is moving toward a single economy, a one-world government (maybe Socialism), you are probably right. That is the goal of the anti-Christ -- a Big Brother style world.

    I am mainly calling politicians stupid. Especially the ones that think they can make Socialism work. Anyone that approves of Socialism is either too young to think clearly or has not had to deal with it very extensively. Socialism, Fascism, Communism, are all just big government ideas. Big government enslaves us and reduces productivity. For more on this, see ...

    http://www.soulcast.com/post/show/198744/The-Essence-Of-Freedom

    That video says it all. We are either free or slaves of big government, no matter what we call that government.

  • kevinunknown said on Sep 10, 2009....

    Alien—I laughed at what you said about global governance being the goal of the anti-Christ if you go and read “why a world state is inevitable teleology and the logic of anarchy” by Alexander Wendt of Chicago university you will understand why I laughed and why it is inevitable and probably a good thing, of course this is just a theory. I always love it how you always manage to talk shit about socialism regardless of the blog, well done.  

  • javadewd said on Sep 10, 2009....
    There is a big difference between the socialism originating from Chicago and the socialism reverberating out of Europe. I wish you'd take the time to write about the contrast between the two, Kev. Seriously.
  • kevinunknown said on Sep 10, 2009....

    The paper is not about socialism. The clue is in the title.

  • ALIENated said on Sep 10, 2009....

    What is teleology? A master's degree, really? I assume you meant theology.

    Out of Obama's own mouth you have to have heard things like "redistribution of wealth". I use the term Socialism for lack of a better word. Obama is buying votes like most Democrats buy votes ... with promises of handouts and a free ride to deadbeats who think the world owes them something. (The poor bastards that took the Cash for Clunkers money probably do not even know it is taxable income.) Past generations of Americans and past generations of Europeans would be appalled at the attitude of Democrats / Socialists these days. Unions, which were once necessary, are now collectively bargaining our automakers out of existence along with many other companies. Or they have caused companies to move their manufacturing to other countries where people are glad to have a job and do not mind putting in a full day's work. Democrats / Socialists are the Union's main partner in all that.

    Black people in America, stuck on the Democrat / Socialist plantation ... well we all know how that is turning out. God bless America? Reverend Wright, Obama's pastor for so many years, says "God damn America". Democrats / Socialists are the party that reassures blacks that everything is racially motivated and that they are owed something.

    God? What God? Democrats / Socialists have run God out of damn near everything they possibly can, and then claim they are Christians or Jews. They abort babies and claim they are Christiana or Jews. They promote homosexuality and claim they are Christians or Jews. That makes me laugh.

    In the past, I read Revelations, the last book of the Holy Bible, wondering how the whole world would fall under the spell of the anti-Christ seeing as it is spelled out right there in Revelations in black and white. Just in the last couple of years, I have seen society CHANGE so drastically that I no longer wonder about that.

    Glad I could make you laugh. Enjoy it. The time for laughter is almost over, but being so in tune with Socialism, you may not even notice the difference. And that may just be it ... misery loves company.

  • javadewd said on Sep 10, 2009....
    He's a Brit. I thought he meant Tea-ology, but I was mistaken... Good going, Pip!
  • kevinunknown said on Sep 10, 2009....

    No, I meant teleology how about you ignorant people go and look it up. And for the record i don’t drink tea

  • ALIENated said on Sep 10, 2009....

    Hmmm. Never heard of it. However, it might have been covered in my Existentialism class in college, but that was a long time ago, and pretty far out, weird thinking. I am a mathematician, not a psychotron. All that sort of stuff (Nitche, Sartre, Hegel, Kierkegaard) is probably what got Europe on the wrong path in the early 20th century. I would not pay too much attention to all that. Two and two is four. Most of those guys question even that. Teleology sounds like chicken and egg thinking. Who cares? Neither would I pay too much attention to someone who hides out in the halls of a university where liberalism abounds and stunts the logical mind and bullcrap passes for wisdom. However, there will be a world government someday, but it will not be subject to the anti-Christ. It will be subject to God.

  • javadewd said on Sep 10, 2009....
    It's just post-modernism bullshit. I think I'll be taking your man card from you now, Pip.
  • javadewd said on Sep 12, 2009....
    I'm sorry, did a liberal have an idea?
  • ALIENated said on Sep 12, 2009....

    He keeps adding a comment with no words. What is that all about? Maybe it is a way of saying ... if you have nothing good to say, say nothing.

  • kevinunknown said on Sep 12, 2009....

    Don’t know what happened there seems to happen when I post on your blog’s. But I said: “that’s it just dismiss my idea without bother to find out what it is, I think that is the point at which ignorance becomes stupidity.”

  • ALIENated said on Sep 12, 2009....

    I do not dismiss the idea, I just disagree with it. I think the anti-Christ will try to unite the world under one-world government, but it will not last long. It is not inevitable. I think people who believe that may have read too much science fiction. That is the problem with liberals. They see Star Trek or Star Wars, or read a science fiction novel about the future and believe that IS the way it will be ... the Federation or something. Who knows, but I doubt it. But I do not doubt that most of us would be very uncomfortable in the future just as people from 100 years ago would be uncomfortable living in our time. I would say, at best, we all have to learn to get along before someone sets off a nuclear device and creates a second moon. (I read science fiction, too.)

  • javadewd said on Sep 12, 2009....
    Only when there are other planetary systems (and threats thereof) will such a Federation come to be. Becoming a one-world government is even more dangerous than trying to consolidate power in DC. Too much power in once place makes people ass-hats straight away. That's why we're a Republic, we diffuse power to 50 states!
  • bhalah said on Sep 15, 2009....
    sory, just want to said, is not in one governament in the world i belive, of course..,  but.., one place where all the governaments, will have to come whith the home work well done, it means each countrys adapted as them ourn posibilitys, a give and a take, but... in a way, where the human rights, will be the base, sory i am a dreamer, but not the anticrist idea, no..
     
    Dont want to upcet enyone, i know..., i dont know, but i like to put my noise.. maybe i can learn one day, and have better ideas, or concepts, just that.

Comment on "The STUPID Effect"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

Every week, I delve into our local city entertainment/op-ed/newspaper....
The only human being on the planet that can eject a huge turd, yet somehow dupe the media into thinking it's a golden egg that smells like roses....
He didn't even try to answer it. What would be your answer? Were we right in dropping the bombs on Japan?...

Sarah Palin would be a disaster for the Republicans,
in my humble opinion.

...