mOOn_platOOn's tags:

freedOm is an illusiOn maintained by cOnfOrmity

mOOn platOOn

Copyright © 2009 Steve Games First serial rights released to SoulCast. Photos, graphics, contents and characters may not be replicated for use outside SoulCast or commercial use in the open market or on other websites without express permission of the author. All rights reserved

 

Don’t let me disturb the illusion. This ripple in your pond will settle out soon.

 

But when a cop pulls up behind you, do you sweat? Does your pulse quicken? Are you sure the lights are going to start flashing?

 

And that’s even if you’re completely innocent of anything you can think of!

 

Why do the police wear black? Why do they have scary-looking black cars that resemble Battle Cruisers from the Evil Empire?

 

Keep your clothes on, your penis in, and your excuse handy when you must defend yourself against vindictive false charges.

 

You are free to not drive and not pay taxes and not have credit. But if you use society – if you want to live “normally” among us – Rulemakers will find ways to make you conform. Tickets, more taxes and threats, for example.

 

Look around the world. Oh yes, there are different political “systems” in place. But look closely. See the roads? The buildings? The cars? The lighting? The toys? The food chains? The surface of the civilized world? Strikingly similar. Everywhere.

 

Our heroic ancestors fought against tyranny. They stood against injustice. They peeled back the layers of dead skin grown over much of Freedom. But Freedom has not yet been fully revealed.

 

Yet the roads roll on. And the music plays on. And you will be fined. And taxed. And charged. And no one seems to notice that our economic system simply does not work. That it is all one massive, glorified, gilded pyramid scheme.

 

How “free” are we?

 

In the West we are particularly susceptible to freedom, liberty and rights. Other societies respond to other key words or phrases, but those are the ones we like. Yet do any of those concepts mean anything except that conformity is the rule?

 

In America’s case: You must grant others their freedoms. You must grant others their rights. Conform to the Norm.

 

Freedom is a flag waved boldly, but what exactly does it mean? Freedom to choose our leaders?

 

Once chosen, are our leaders free?

 

Freedom is then defined by “rights.”

 

The jargon of our lives that we take for granted. “Freedom.” “Rights.”

 

Any freedoms called Rights come as releases from societal restrictions already in place. A natural sense of freedom, like our natural intimacy with our own identity, is snatched away from us individually at very early ages. We spend our lifetimes trying to get them back.

 

And what have we, collectively, after centuries of struggle, won back? The freedom – or Right - to change each others’ minds, or try. The freedom to argue openly with someone who could easily pay to have you killed – and expect not to be killed.

 

The freedom to seduce your daughter without getting killed.

 

The freedom to steal from you unless I get caught.

 

The freedom to change my mind and cost you dearly by withdrawal.

 

Politicians have used these words to manipulate the public for centuries. “Freedom.” “Liberty.” “Rights.” The freedom to be used OUR way instead of THEIRS is your choice. The freedom to choose between limited, self-serving systems.

 

If we do not live in a police state, why does everyone fear the police?

 

Without rules, and enforcers, you’ll argue, there is chaos.

 

But even WITH rules there is chaos. Rules never prevent chaos. Rules try to fix it. You’ll notice that even in the absence of rules there is ORDER. You may not like the order, but order prevails with or without rules.

 

Rules are tools. Weapons. Devices. The political orthodoxy of today would have us believing that rules are the very reason that Freedom exists. As if you could use a hammer and nails to create the atoms composing them. Freedom already exists. Everyone possesses it. You are free to walk away at any time. But the consequences have been structured severely to restrain your independence.

 

While I know the reality of bad policing is rampant, my own encounters with cops have almost always been good or fair. This, despite my minority status in most jurisdictions. Go figure. In fact, I downright enjoyed one such recent interaction that you can read about in a post of mine called "my car went boom!!!!!!!" posted on Feb 18, 2009. wherein my car burst into flames and I skidded to a spinaround stop on the I-5.

 

.Good guys in a bad system. We’re convinced that we’re free.

 

The prisoners have been convinced that they are free.



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • studentoflife said on Aug 26, 2009....
     
     
    A natural sense of freedom, like our natural intimacy with our own identity, is snatched away from us individually at very early ages. We spend our lifetimes trying to get them back.
     
    This statement stood out to me.... it seems to say that we are born
     with a sense of freedom and knowledge of identity. I see
    this to mean that the peace of our animal minds is
     corrupted by the piled-on knowledge of millennia of
     civilisation.....
     
    But what proof is there that we have this
     natural sense of self in the first place?
     
     
  • HoleInTheCosmos said on Aug 26, 2009....
     
    Even those of my demographic (middle-aged, white, middle-class) get somewhat unnerved at the sight of a patrol car or motorcycle cop approaching in the rear-view mirror.
     
    Freedom outside of civilization would be its own kind of prison, would it not?
     
    First you called into question the concept of "Rights" and now you tell us "Freedom" is an illusion. Are you an anarchist?
     
     
  • gingersoul said on Aug 26, 2009....

    mOOnie....i just had to post this....don't you agree?

    "Don’t let me disturb the illusion. This ripple in your pond will settle out soon"......i like this....


  • somethingunUSual said on Aug 26, 2009....
    Why the hell do you THINK the police wear black? They're trying to intimidate people. Do you think PINK would be better? Maybe a floral design?
     
     
  • trebleclef said on Aug 26, 2009....
     
    to student, and child
     
    minds in the wild
     
    know who and what they are
     
    by age of 2
     
    the elders undo
     
    the makings of water and stars
     
  • RodSerling said on Aug 26, 2009....
     
    Self awareness is a gilded bitch.
     
     
  • mobil said on Aug 26, 2009....
    Freedom is posessing a mind that doesn't enslave itself with nonsense such as this.
     
    Ignorance is bliss? Stupid? Nah, it's more like the old saying; Don't make  mountains out of intellectual horse shit.........
     
     
  • hotaka said on Aug 26, 2009....
    "Any freedoms called Rights come as releases from societal restrictions already in place."

    There's a comment for every paragraph in this post but the thing that kept coming to me was summed up in the phrase of yours I quoted above.

    Freedom has lots of meanings, including the ones you pointed out. But there can never be true freedom. Rules are there to make sure everybody plays nicely and not everybody follows the rules. No rules can lead to order by a tacit understanding of what is right and wrong, unspoken, unwritten rules by which people can agree. But who can enforce the rules that aren't expressed in words? With anarchy no one is truly free either because of the constant fear that the strong will terrorize the weak.

    There is no freedom. There are only systems that attempt to give people as much freedom as possible without rocking the boat.

    And I have only once had a bad police encounter with a cop who was a jerk to me after a traffic accident that resulted in my car putting a small scratch in the car of a pretty young woman.
  • mobil said on Aug 27, 2009....
    Ok, I have to step into the light for a moment, with the hope that I don't embarrass myself.
     
    There is such a thing as freedom, but one must remove himself further or completely from society in order to attain it, or some semblance of it.
     
    Native American's got close, but were restricted by their own society and culture as was the case with other aboriginal cultures.
     
    There were a group of men who early in the Nineteenth Century possessed total freedom, these were the Mountain Men of the fur trade era between 1806 and roughly 1835.
     
    Not all of them, but the free trappers who married Indian women and sired wild half breed children in a wilderness so vast as to stagger a modern man's imagination.
     
    Life was cheap, death and danger commonplace, yet the freedom, total intoxicating freedom is what kept these men there in spite of the privations and short life expectancy.
     
    The further one removes himself from society, the more free he becomes, even here in Montana while not completely free. I  have much more latitude with the rules and regulations of society than my brothers and sisters on both coasts. It's why I live here.
     
    I know several families who live in cabins in the most remote areas of Alaska simply for the freedom it affords them. Not total freedom, but damn close.
     
    Freedom is a relative term, I knew an old man who said; We are not free till we are free of the flesh. Sorry about my intellectual horse shit comment, I just spewed plenty of non intellectual horseshit on this page myself.
  • beyondtheveil said on Aug 27, 2009....
    I agree with mobile that the closest one can get to freedom is the farthest from society. Those who live in a society trade freedom for safety and security. You cannot use 'safety and security' in the same sentence with freedom. Those who live in a society are enslaved to a large degree and most of those same people want to be told what to do, how to live.

    Freedom is far too difficult to live under for almost all people. They need people, their egos fed, to be taken care of, and are satisfied being controlled for what they consider society's perceived advantages. Freedom is a much layered word by world societies and do little justice to that word.

    There is only a 'myth of freedom' in any so-called 'free society'.
  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Aug 27, 2009....
    Little known fact = many slaves are comfortable making
     no decisions and having life laid out for them. In fact,
     slavery could still work as long as the slaves were volunteers.
  • 762MM said on Aug 27, 2009....
    I've moved around the country a lot and I find it interesting that the first thing most people ask is: "Are you married?" and/or "Do you have kids?" When I say "No" to both questions it seems like alarms go off in their heads- "INDEPENDENT THINKER ALERT...THIS IS NOT A DRILL!" Then, later, there are no more questions. In fact, there isn't any small talk. Nothing. Just odd glances. 38? No kids? No wife? Then the whispers start up. Then the rumors...even though they haven't taken 5 seconds to try to know me as a person. I think this is an area of conformity that doesn't get discussed very often. Having, or not having, a family of my own is my choice. Maybe someday, maybe not. It's not really anyone's business but they make it theirs.
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 27, 2009....

    O


    student - I like trebleclef's answer, did you see it? Humans are advantaged and disadvantaged by accute self-awareness. While we're being socially trained, we're being distanced from our natural intuitions. Some of us get through it intack, others become robots. Yes, sorry to say, many people - many - are robotic (pre-programmed) throughout life merely responding in ways that they interpret as "acceptable."

    Hole - I think anarchy simply leaves us with the Rule of the Bully, so no, I'm for social order. However, can't social order change? We're way too hung up on paradoxes like "freedom" and "rights" to see the forest. There is no freedom and rights are invented.

    ginger - thank you and thank you!

    somethin - well, gee, yeah, that's what I figured. Point being, why do we tolerate a scary-looking police force? Why do we WANT one? I'm all for using psychological weapons, but EVERYONE has to deal with the cops, not just hard criminals. Public servants with ultimate power over you ought not look scary. The power is scary enough.

    treb - you got it, and nice to see you rhymin' again!

    rod - aye, the double-edged sword

    mobil - nonsense such as what? My post? Thinking about freedom? I guess I could assume that you just called my stuff "intellectual horseshit." Why do you bother showing up?

    hotaka - Yes, and every time I hear of a lady wiggling out of a ticket because of sexism it boils my bisquits.

    mobil 2 - Oh - apology accepted. Thanks for the thoughts. I see we're in agreement.

    beyond - Indeed.

    Kilgore - It is true. Many slaves of the South were utterly confused and despondant when confronted with "freedom." And many free people love to be bossed around, even yearn for it. Volunteer slavery - let's give it a chance!

    762 - conform......conform.....cOnfOrm.....

    O
  • mobil said on Aug 27, 2009....
    mobil- nonsense such as, yeah this post. Fuckin A, bloviating about freedom. Yeah you could assume I called your stuff intellectual horseshit, or you could read what I said and know I called your stuff intellectual horseflop. I show up because I want to, if you don't like it moonie why not block me?
     
    mobil 2- oh excuse me all to hell, I just read this and see that we are not only in agreement, but buddies as well. You're welcome, thoughts are all I have.
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 27, 2009....
    O
     
    Well you know, mobil, I've made a habit of giving the handicapped the benefit of the doubt. I have been known to misread from time to time, and thought that maybe you weren't on the rag as usual.
     
    As for being your buddy, from the way you read (that is, seem on the page) that would be scary. See how easy it is to add-on?
     
    It takes a lot more than the little pricks that you dish out to get blocked. Since you're intent on picking fights with me for some reason unknown but to yourself, I won't spoil your fun, except for the fact that nothing you've ever had to say so far has had enough substance or style to raise any emotional reaction. I'm guessing now that you couldn't follow the post and so fell back on your classification strategy to assauge your ego.
     
    I'll work on putting out a 6th grade level version for ya.
     
    O
  • hotaka said on Aug 27, 2009....
    mOOn, and then there are minority groups and immigrants who try to get out of a ticket because they claim racism even though they actually did commit a ticketable traffic violation.
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 27, 2009....
    O
     
    Oh, BTW, mobsie, I'm wondering - since nothing you said makes it obvious - what is it that seems "horseshitty" to you, since you seem to be saying - in your own amusingly colloquial syntax - the same thing, only with much less finesse?
     
    O
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 27, 2009....
    O
     
    Yeah Hot, I hear ya.
     
    You know, it's hard for most of us (except maybe mobil) to believe that anyone would dislike us for our REAL selves, so it's really difficult for a genuine asshole who happens to be black (or Asian, or whatever other than white or the majority in whatever situation) to believe that he's being disliked for himself. It HAS to be his (race, religion, creed), right?
     
    O
  • mobil said on Aug 27, 2009....
    Oh moonie, it appears I got your dander up, wasn't my intent as you see I came back a second time for a closer examination of your eloquent post.
     
    This last that I commented was intended to be humorous moonie, mobil and mobil 2 as if you read them like that. You know slap me there and pat me there, I was copying you moonie.
     
    But then you saw fit to attack me for my rather clumsy effort at humor. I am an asshole by nature moonie, I'll admit to that and leave it at that.
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 28, 2009....
    O
     
    mobil - Well, it wasn't much of an attack, was it? It's not like I went all *~*GollyGoneStupid*~* on you or anything.
     
    Obviously I'm not attuned to your style of humor. I, too, have been misunderstood when trying only to be funny. I like it when you show up, it's just that sometimes you seem hostile. So I take advantage of that by getting SithBorgy - which is always fun.
     
    And to everyone else -
     

    I think part of mobil’s reaction to my “horse dooey” stems from a dim awareness in the back of his Neanderthal skull that the world is about to change radically. Freedom is a Trojan horse stuffed with political surprises. He admits we’re not free and casually accepts it. Typical. A perfect example of the complacency that this post rails against.

     

    Such casual acceptance of a police state cries of helplessness. Can’t we do better? Must we live in fear of our own authority? Or is that authority not ours but the shadowy ghost authority of our long dead forebears? The old ways have been prolonged beyond their usefulness and now breed the very evils they sought to conquer.

     

    We need to completely re-invent our economic systems, legal systems and especially our institutions. We need a new revolution.

     

    People like Obama and McCain seek to perpetuate the old ways. Bailouts. They use the very phrases discussed here in the very manner described in the post. People like mobil are invested in the same scheme. Something new? Forget it. As if radical change could pose more danger than perpetual devolution.

     

    As to the nature of that change? It’s time to invent again. Take your “isms” to their graves – Communism, Socialism, Capitalism as one. Take your “freedom” rhetoric and throw it on top of the casket. Why bail them out and shut ourselves in?

     

    We have the technology. We can rebuild it. We can make it better.

     

     
     
     
  • studentoflife said on Aug 28, 2009....
    but a totally New Society can only arise from the ashes of the old one. Or is that the old way of lOOking at things?
  • somethingunUSual said on Aug 28, 2009....
    mobil's right. What's the friggin' point? Revolution??? Seriously. And what's the new order going to be? I don't see any suggestions there.
     
    There have to be some new ideas if you're gonna throw out the old ones. What's your new "ism?" Or if not an ism, they a what-um???
     
    Otherwise, freedom means what it means - free from tyranny. You think the cops are tyrants? Look up the meaning of the word.
  • hotaka said on Aug 28, 2009....
    mOOn, just rushing through all the fun reading above but in response to your comment on my comment, you make a point that is perfectly clear and obvious. To add a little, I'll say that people sadly don't take responsibility for their own actions and try to pass the blame onto something or someone else. So using racism as an argument to get out of commiting an offense or violation is a typical example of that.
    But that is perhaps a topic for another post. Your point here was about the illuson of freedom being maintained by conformity, which, now that I look at it again, is a great argument.
  • mobil said on Aug 28, 2009....
    Hey don't try to paint me in a certain color or light. I'm mad as hell and probably more ready for a revolution than you are moonie. I don't know that for a fact, but I assume that I am based on my own affiliations.
     
    I'm not a Freeman or an End of the Roader typical of some here. To assume that I am not locked and loaded and ready would be to akin to thinking I've missed a KKK meeting last year. (just kidding)
     
    When I first came here prostitution was legal, drinking and driving only became illegal last October, I could drive as fast as I felt comfortable driving, I can still carry a side arm anywhere except Federal Bldgs. I could buy dynamite in the hardware store, not anymore. Gambling wasn't legal, but it was prevalent.
     
    I used to could board a commercial airliner with an assault riffle in a duffle bag. Little by little our personal freedoms are being take away from us. I say personal freedoms because I consider them separate from all the other freedoms lost.
     
    My take on this is that we are fucked, either we revolt or we are fucked as Americans. We'll never be free, not completely free as long as we depend on government big or small. Not so long as there are 300 million of us clogging the byways depending on someone to protect and serve us.
     
    I don't need cops, by the time a cop got to my house the intruder would be bled out. I carry wherever I roam, only needed it once. Rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
     
    In conclusion, follow me, I'm the guy in the front with a 357mag. and a hundred yard stare.
     
     
  • hotaka said on Aug 28, 2009....
    "I could buy dynamite in the hardware store."

    mobil, now that sounds like the wild American West!

    As for boarding a plane with an assault rifle and losing the freedom to buy and bear dangerous things, blame it on the people who misuse these things. In my city in Canada we used to enjoy the neighbourhood Halloween fireworks. Now my city has outlawed the sale and use of fireworks because too many people used them for foolish things like shooting roman candles at people and houses or putting exploding things in cats' butts. Stupid people do things that make the lawmakers pass laws that take away the freedoms of responsible, sensible people. In Japan there are not nearly so many incidents with fireworks and yet we can buy them at 7/11 all throughout the summer. You can suggest any reason you like as to why people behave less foolishly with fireworks over here but what I know from home is that people can be very creative when it comes to vandelism and doing things that threaten body parts. I only have to recall the firecracker that exploded next to my ear one year because someone threw it at me or the time my jeans caught fire when someone squirted flaming gasoline from a honey squeeze bottle. Of course, I did once enjoy a roman candle fight in the school yard with my friends. You should see the reaction that gets from my students here when I tell them about it.
  • desdemona said on Aug 28, 2009....

    omg i was really convinced that i was free!!! shit!!! thanks for

     breaking the spell asshole

  • hotaka said on Aug 29, 2009....
    Actually, mOOn's title fits in rather well with the idea of losing rights such as the ones mobil mentioned. As long as we can agree upon our degree of freedom we can live comfortably believing we are free. But when people start doing things against our codes and laws we feel it necessary to change the laws in order to make it harder for them to abuse the system. As a result, the responsible people lose some of their freedom. Maybe stricter punishment would be better for the lawbreakers instead of spoiling the party for everyone else.
  • mobil said on Aug 29, 2009....
    Hot; dynamite was mostly used to blast stumps and anyone over 18 could buy it, we used it also for the 4th of July, but it was hardly misused.
     
    I've always had this idea that neighborhood men should band together to straighten out people who do stupid things like putting firecrackers in cat's butts.
     
    I'm not totally for vigilantism, but in most cases that don't involve a capital offence, things similar to cat's butts and vandalism, these guys could simply drag the hapless bastards out into the streets and yank his pants down and place a fire cracker in his butt cheeks (not directly in his butt hole) to allow him some idea of how not funny such a thing is.
     
    Same with vandals, lets say some teens damaged some local playground equipment. The men would go to the vandals home and smash something of real value to the vandals. If their parents resist, kick the snot out of them too. It'd be obvious the parents were not raising the kid properly and were in need of a good ass kicking themselves.
     
    I understand this could get out of hand, so we'd have to have a broader, wider, bigger group of men to stand ready to kick the daylights out of any in these neighborhood groups were they to act in a less than straightforward way.
     
    This whole thing with sex offenders being place in neighborhoods is an abomination, our neighborhood men could play an active roll in dragging these perverts into the streets and fixing them in ways that didn't allow them to hurt another child (ie) removing genitals and hands. Of course mistakenly doing this to an innocent party would be considered stupid in and of itself. This larger group of men would have to be brought in to remove the genitals of the obviously stupid smaller group of men. Checks and balances don't you see?
     
    These are just a few of the many ideas I have for increasing the freedom of regular folks and bringing the bad and stupid under control. I think the first place I would go to correct some major league stupid is the TSA at our airports. Some big time ass kicking is in order for these government jerkoffs and while we're at it government workers in general. Where in the hell do they get their attitudes Hot? Lets slap them around until the get a smile on their stupid faces and begin to act like servants rather than jack booted thugs. C'mon !
     
     
  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Aug 29, 2009....

    Now you boys are treading down a dangerous pathway. These punishments remind me of the middle east, chopping off a hand for stealing a loaf of bread and such. It's too easy to get set-up by enemies and/or falsely accused. So you have to have the tribunal first, right, just to corroborate facts and fictions? Because you assume innocence will come through only after the balls are off, and corrections made by removing even more balls. So before any balls are removed, the ball-removers are going to cover their asses by getting approval and a guarantee that their own balls are safe, right? So that requires a trial and a court and....oh, see, you guys used to have it your way and look what happened. We're talking about moving into the future here, right? Not the past...
  • mobil said on Aug 29, 2009....
    Vigilantism in and of itself is flawed KVT, I've read just about everything written about this subject. It started with the 49ers in California's gold fields and worked it's way to Montana's gold fields and later to the big cattle country of Montana and Wyoming.
     
    Trials were held, but I have to tell you they didn't resemble the law in anyway. So you're gonna lose some innocent people in this quest for freedom. There ain't no way around it, the other thing is women, they bring a balance to the men.
     
    That's why vigilantism might work a tat better with women around and it being carried out by the men of the neighborhood. Lets say a four block area for the local policing, then work with the men of a 16 block area to oversee the smaller 4 block groups. After that you'd have all the decent men in town form a committee to oversee everything going on in order to maintain order.
     
    The idea being that more good men, or lots of good men are wiser than say just that 4 block group. I can't see lawyers being involve unless target practice (joking) is needed. I think we need to model from the past, which will then become the future. Too many pussies out in manville today, we gotta toughen these young men up and I think there's no better way that to put every swingin dick through Marine Corps boot camp at 18 years of age.
     
    Make em give two years of community, state or national service for their country, man I have the ideas, are you writin this stuff down?  :)
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Aug 31, 2009....
    O
     
    Here's my take on future developments, and year 2172 in particular relates to my thoughts on "Freedom"
     
     
  • RollingC said on Sep 13, 2009....
    Maybe if we all Hummm and do Mantras we can attain enlightment thereby attaining a semblance of freedom....(or not)
    Society is changing that's for sure but not sure into what.   Once upon a time I remember (in  Weschester County, NY) that we (the family) spent most of 5 years without locking our front door...or any door for that matter. 
    Sure it was a small town, but them days is gone even for the small town that Ossinning was (and still is).
    Rc

Comment on "freedOm is an illusiOn maintained by cOnfOrmity"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

That people are fucking vermin.

Watch the X factor. Watch Strictly. Numb your fucking brain. Support the troops that create unrest in the Middle East and cause terrorism. Be angry at Nick Griffin but then read the trashy tabloids that air ju...