mOOn_platOOn's tags:

mOOn platOOn

Copyright © 2009 Steve Games First serial rights released to SoulCast. Photos, graphics, contents and characters may not be replicated for use outside SoulCast or commercial use in the open market or on other websites without express permission of the author. All rights reserved

 

While “race” is a crude term meaning little more in stark reality than
a difference in pigmentation, face shapes, general size and hair type,
those are the subtle distinctions leading to a major evolutionary jump.

The black race dominated the mix 90,000 years ago, in an Africa where
early homo sapiens had undergone several experiments with skin, noses,
eyes, skulls, muscles and proportions. Pigmentation in early humanity,
dating back 100,000 years, included green and blue hues. Naked skin
was an experiment in sensitivity requiring adjustments and layering.
The sun and atmospheric conditions prevailing then effected early
emergence from predecessory beings.

70,000 years ago:
Adventurous, bold and desperate blacks, the first truly conscious beings
surviving into the modern age, were pushed, compelled and convinced
to explore northward along the Eternal Coast into India, where climate
and environment performed subtle transformations, and into the deep
regions of the Middle East and Southeastern Europe, relentlessly
moving Eastward to seek the place where the Sun is born each day.
And to distance themselves from the deepest, darkest night of the Sun’s
glorious death every dusk.

50,000 years ago:
From these primary blacks grew the adaptive yellow and brown races
of the North (Oriental) and the South (Indian), both of straight, black
hair, but distinguished by head and size and relevance to light. Their
sons and daughters doubled back toward Africa in many generations,
created a Mediterranean brew giving birth to early forms of civil
interaction.

This racial soup, now realizing the endless horizon, the eternity of
Sunrise, the inevitability of Nightfall, the recurrence of Seasons and
the uncertainty of Death, explored the cold North regions.

30,000 years ago:
Northward they ventured, perished, revived and renewed their efforts,
needing more transparency for the weaker, shorter Sunlight. Lighter
they became, longer grew their noses, slower pumped their blood to
accommodate ever colder climates.

Completely Occidental and white, those Northern Europeans chose
once more to seek out the Sun, the nesting waters or world where
each new day began. And never was it found. Even as the waters
and islands grew ever smaller and shorter between, forming a bare
bridge of land and sea, only more land was to be found.

More and more, a greater land, a world of monsters and ever more
Eastern horizons, but unexplored Southern Ways as well. What was
this strange South Way? Was it the Africa often told tales of? Was
it some new world no one had yet known?

10,000 years ago:
And their skins grew darker once more, their faces broader, as the
warmth, heat and light of the Sun grew stronger. And the reds
grew as one with their new world.

Today:

Large numbers of these races still survive, and ever newer versions
grow possible from their increased intermixing. Environmental
interchange at relatively instant rates has trumped genetic adaptation
for the moment.

A surprising result my spring forth…!

- OO -
 
 


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • somethingunUSual said on Jul 30, 2009....
    Green and blue hues? I knew I had relatives here at one
    time.
  • StoneMaster said on Jul 30, 2009....

    Wasn't that camouflage they were wearing?

    After the human race finishes intermixing...what are we'all going to look like?
    Will there still be physical differences?


    Differences of opinion will always be with us but can we learn to handle them without interfering emotions?

    Or letting emotions interfere with our understanding?

    Will we ever truly " understand " our emotions?

     

    pffffffffttttttt,,,,,,,,,,,

  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Jul 30, 2009....

    Brother,

    You neglected to reference the role that ethnocentrism played in the evolution of man. Ethnocentrism or RACISM was selected by evolution as a method for differentiating the hominid species into competing camps in the early evolution of man.

    The necessary evil was used to develop the great cognitive and mental abilities that elevated the species above its animal origins. That same evil lies as a remnant in the soul of man. It is an appendage that has lost its purpose yet remains a vestigial structure to kill its host out of pure spite.

    This is from the Science side of KVT. The Spiritual of side KVT is ashamed this evil has survived.

  • HoleInTheCosmos said on Jul 30, 2009....
    mOOn, you said:

    "A surprising result my spring forth…!" ... "my" ???

    I realize this was probably a typo; however, was it really?

    HITC has an image of mOOn acting as Zeus with respect to his eye for the ladies. And HITC is roaring with laughter.

    For the rest, I'll think about. What is "race," what is "time" with respect to evolution? Can you evaluate evolution based on the perception of time by the human brain, i.e., can one observe acurately or even rationally one's own evolution as it is happening?

    I find that doubtful.

    KVT: Identity crisis huh? Can't science be spiritual, and spiritual be science? Or at least hold hands. What about Yin/Yang? Think in terms of balance, not either/or? What's outside your box?

    HoleInTheCosmos
  • HoleInTheCosmos said on Jul 30, 2009....
    Actually, I meant to say,

    "I find that doubtful in physical reality, with the current status of the human brain." Or something like that.

    I do think its possible to observe this world and the inhabitants from somewhere else. Probable? Nope, I mean you really can do it, but not from inside the human brain.

    HITC
  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Jul 30, 2009....

    Hole,


    Can you please speak English; I have no idea what dialect you are using but is reminiscent of monkey.

    mOOn presented a plausible developmental history of the species and you just spoke in tongues.

    Kilgore

  • desdemona said on Jul 30, 2009....
    it's not a race cause we're all gonna win!!!

    very interesting, mOOnie platOOner
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Jul 30, 2009....

    O

    mOOn never typos

    ;)


    wekk, alomost never....

    O

  • trebleclef said on Jul 30, 2009....
    black man, brown man, yellow man, white: red man fall into the night - white man, yellow man, brown man, black, once gone there's no turning back
  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Jul 30, 2009....
    We all come from a single African mother at the dawn of mankind. She is the true Eve. The garden we left was a world before language. Existence there was only immediate, emotional burning with hunger, tearing and fear in a carefree eden. Self awareness was the name of the forbidden fruit that would eventually cast us forth. Or... The Honorable Elijiah Mohammed was right and all races of color are the children of the sun who were created by a loving god. White's on the other hand were a failed breeding experiment done by evil scientists and thus can be truthfully called devils. Or...
  • StoneMaster said on Jul 30, 2009....
    goes to the stash box.......rolls himself a fattie... lights it up.... * sigh * ....takes a tremendous drag.... *here we go again!* pfffffffffffffffffttttttttt
  • somethingunUSual said on Jul 30, 2009....
    Amazing how rampant this tendency to denigrate Caucasians. It's obvious to anyone alive and non- comatose that many admirable Caucasians have championed the "good" cause and that they are likely in a vast majority out of the whole and yet the trumpets blare against the pale-faced tyrant, nature's most hideous blue-eyed invention. What a horrible trangression, and created by some abnormal experience, it is rumored. What a fate.
  • StoneMaster said on Jul 30, 2009....
    pffftttt...meaaant to say anonymous....
  • StoneMaster said on Jul 30, 2009....
    When are we going to get rid of the color combination speculation?? What and how many have been the people that have made a contribution to family, nation, race??? What has been the common denominator between them all??? Is it Intelligence?, Education?, Desire?, Drive?, Greed?, Anger?, Hate?, or Love? How many smoke-screens are we allowing to get in the way of our path to Oneness? With each other... and with God?
  • Kirkla said on Jul 30, 2009....
    This is an intersting take on the history of skin color. I'm not certain it was evolutionary....that implies that blacks are primitive and I just don't buy that. Wait...did the point of this just roll over my head?
  • sheemAfeM said on Jul 30, 2009....
    hey mOOn did you miss me?? i bet you did... cause i didnt...
    ;) i come n not tell you, damn out of question... off course you the first one i come and poke and jab...
    seems you been busy?? with your usual mischief i guess...
    Salaam S
  • UnicornForm said on Jul 30, 2009....
    I dont care what color i am, they are, were. It is hard to understand saying we were all black at one time.
  • TheUndergroundEagle said on Jul 30, 2009....
    mOOn, I have previously pointed out, and quoted some people on this issue, racism was multiplied and justified by the THEORY of evolution. Racism in its purist form, uegenics, was thought out by Darwins Cousin and was a great inspiration to Hitler. I don't really understand why people hate Hitler so much, he just followed what evolution tought him. Anyway, evolution gave a very nuce justufucation for racist atrosities.

    Further, black parent can't hav white kids and vice versa. This is hight school biology. To rely on mutations to give the convenient genetic change, is typical of a theory that has no basis in science. It can't be tested, repeated or proven. Here is a link on genetics as I believe it to be.

    http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/race-skincolor.html

    You may compare me to mister atom, but even with the millions of years claimed by evolutionists, they have still to supply a single intermediate species, say a land dwelling swamp whale. There are NO intermediates in the fossil record. Why do you think the missing link is called the missing link? Because its not there. Perhaps you read the latest research showing that modern Europeans have a lot of Neanderthal genes? That's because they were just human, not some intermediate pre-black humans.
    Let me show you your progressive racism, even if you are not a racist in your heart, you thoughts have been indoctrinated by evolutionary theory: Stage one
    "The sun and atmospheric conditions prevailing then effected early emergence from predecessory beings." Just out of the swamp, early man, just not predecessory = black
    STage two "the first truly conscious beings" = Indians and Eastern Cultures
    Stage three " forms of civil interaction." So the previous one has conciousness, but no social skills, interesting, I quote MAdona ""‘Maybe a lot of it has to do with the fact that they haven’t had the same chances as we white people have had to be educated or exposed to things that make you more evolved.’""
    And finally, "Large numbers of these races still survive" That would be the ones before the conscious people =the blacks, or the ones without social skills? = the Indians?

    I gather that you are not a racist in your life or heart, I just want to point out the significance and logical consequence of the theory of evolution. I leave you with a quote from Sir Arthur Keith, who was a British anthropologist, an atheistic evolutionist and an anti-Nazi, but he drew this chilling conclusion:
    ‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’
    No wait, perhaps you know that the USA also had a selective breeding program like the Nazis, inspired by evolution? "While the horrors of Germany’s Nazi past are well known, it is a well-kept secret that similar programs were also prevalent in some Allied countries. The award-winning investigative journalist Edwin Black has documented America’s huge selective breeding and forced sterilization program in his book War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race.1
    Eugenics is the attempt to breed a better human race by applying evolutionary principles. Its founder was Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton (1822–1911). These ideas were picked up in the USA by Charles Davenport (1866–1944), who founded the Eugenics Record Office in 1910, headed by his right-hand man, Harry Laughlin (1880–1943).

    Eventually, eugenics would gain the support of such notables as President Woodrow Wilson, the Rockefeller Foundation, Margaret Sanger (founder of the abortionist organization Planned Parenthood) and Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. It was bankrolled by some of the richest people in America, including the Carnegie Institution, Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. The major textbook, Hunter’s Civic Biology, blatantly taught white racial supremacy and eugenics. This was the one that the ACLU (the misnamed American Civil Liberties Union), in the infamous Scopes Trial of 1925, defended the ‘right’ to teach!
    The shocking results of the eugenics program included laws against so-called mixed-race marriages in 27 states, human breeding programs, forced sterilization of over 60,000 US citizens and even euthanasia. Eugenics was even allowed by the Supreme Court, which had once declared slaves to be non-persons and now denies humanity to unborn babies."
    Peace to all,
    TheUndergroundEagle
  • studentoflife said on Jul 31, 2009....
    Dear mOOn, you know of coarse that this is impossible? (and very very racist)

    Firstly, you claim that the black people are the least evolved, closest to the apes. This is directly implied by your statements. I think this is racism of the highest degree. I you don't please give a proper response because you have claimed very plainly that black people are the closest to our "ancestors".

    Further, it is impossible once the genetic information for brown eyes and skin have been lost, for evolution to re-create it. This is science fiction and can’t happen. Two blue eyed people cannot have dark offspring (without the help of the milkman) in a million years. That is why there are no black people in Sweden. It does not happen.

    Adam and Eve would have to have been mid-brown people, like most of the people alive today. From this combination, you can go both ways via loss of genetic information through natural selection.
  • Kilgore_V_Trout said on Jul 31, 2009....
    mOOn,

    I found an interesting tidbit that you might also enjoy:

    The Human Immune System May Limit Future Evolution 04 Jul 2002 05:51 GMT

    Scientists from Imperial College London have an answer to why we have fewer genes than expected

    Research published in the July issue of Trends in Immunology, shows how a more advanced immune system in humans could explain why the human genome may have only a slightly greater number of genes than the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and probably less than rice, Oryza sativa.

    Dr Andrew George, from Imperial College London and based at the Hammersmith Hospital comments: "Although humans are normally thought to be considerably more complex than organisms, such as plants, rice, yeast and earthworms, this is not reflected in their number of genes, with humans having less genes than other supposedly less complex organisms."

    Dr George suggests that the limited number of functional genes in the human genome may be a result of the presence of a more advanced immune system. The immune system is designed to protect us from disease, but it is important that the cells of the immune system do not recognise our own tissues or cells, as this would lead to autoimmune disease.

    Autoimmune disease is avoided by killing off any immune cells that recognise molecules produced by the body (self-molecules). This means that the larger the genome, the more self-molecules the immune system needs to tolerate. As a result, the immune system has to kill more immune cells. If there are too many genes then this results in the vast majority of immune cells dying, paralysing the immune system, and leaving the body unable to fight off disease or infection.

    Dr George adds: "The limited size of the human genome could make further evolution for humans difficult. Fortunately, the human genome has been able to create genes which have multiple uses, thus making the best use of a limited number of genes

    So we are in reality less complicated than the rice we ate for dinner.

    Go figure...

    Kilgore
  • travelr712 said on Jul 31, 2009....
    my money's on the star bellied sneetches!
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Jul 31, 2009....
    O
     
    And the evolution of skin into the mutation of color
    (and traits accompanying) equals revolutionary
    changes (lifestyle) but not any indication that the
    race mutating latest is somehow more advanced.

    Just further adapted.

    What's the dishonor in being at the very root of human consciousness? Apes were long past in our family line by the time homo sapiens appeared. Our immediate ancestors were more like us than like apes. Don't get hung up on all that ape shit.

    Being the oldest sometimes means being the wisest.

    As for what's impossible, maybe you're comfortable
    making those kinds of statements, but it reminds me
    of Lord Rutherford who greatly contributed to unlocking
    the secrets to the structure of the atom. An expert as
    much as anyone in his field, he mocked those who
    suggested that anyone could harness the release
    of energy from matter. He died in 1937 quite happy
    with himself.

    Jump to Hiroshima, 1945.
     
  • For the record:

    I am descended directly from whites (maternal)
    and blacks (paternal) and from the North (Scotch/
    Irish-English immigrants) and the South (French-Germans)
    (Africans), and my family won and lost The Civil War.
    It was elating and devestating.

    I'm 10th generation American.

    If I'm a racist, you're The Pope.
  • Kilgore

  • I can't intelligently comment on Dr. George without doing some background and no time for that right now. It has my curiosity, so I'll get to it. Thanks.

    My initial thoughts - whacky as they may turn out to be -
    are that if less genes = more complex behavior, the ultimate behavioral organism will have very few genes....maybe
    just one?

    Maybe God has one pair of genes. ;)

    O

  • mOOn_platOOn said on Jul 31, 2009....

    O

    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN :

    Blacks are in NO WAY put down by ANYTHING that I
    wrote in this post, nor has any other "race" been
    hinted at as being "superior." Advancement is not
    necessarily improvement. Sometimes it's cancer. And
    while that was a snappy statement, I am not putting
    whites down, either. NO RACE deserves elevation or
    sublimation to others. Why? 'Cause there's nothing
    to support superiority or inferiorty in the history of man.

    Great civilizations have been raised by all colors of people
    in all parts of the world.

    That doesn't mean some types haven't been here longer than other types.

    And dude - fossil records? How incomplete are those?
    Can you imagine what wonders remain to be found with
    improved technologies and deductions? Anthropology and Archeology are infants! We're collected the first 20
    pieces of a million-piece jigsaw puzzle.

    My reference to "civil interaction" refers to the Tigris
    Valley where the earliest (so far) signs of organized
    villages have been uncovered. No surprise here if the
    originals are buried back in the jungles of Africa.

    So you've had your tangental rant on eugenics and
    politics - time to create your own post if you feel
    compelled to write more on the subject.

    Thanks for your participation, welcome and enjoyed
    as always.

     

    O

  • StoneMaster said on Jul 31, 2009....
    Not to put anybody down or anything but studentoflife said =>Further, black parent can't hav white kids and vice versa. This is hight school biology. Have you ever been to the island of Puerto Rico? Apparently nobody went to hight school there.....
  • gingersoul said on Jul 31, 2009....
    mOOnie.....i think this theory makes perfect sense.

    Your statement:"Great civilizations have been raised by all colors of people
    in all parts of the world"  provides the right point of view..

     
  • wombat said on Jul 31, 2009....

    When I was about 15, my sister said to me once, "America is the melting pot.  To see if it works."    Not relevant, probably........but it came to mind here.

  • fragglesrock said on Jul 31, 2009....
    really enjoyed reading this and was shocked by some of the negative comments. i didn't take anything as being racist in this blog.
  • Comment on "GIVE ME SOME SKIN: the racial (r)evolution from black to white to red all over"


    (Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

    A test...
    Just sign here...