Historically speaking saying that Conservatives think we have everything just right as is or want to roll back the clock to previous ideas is accurate. To say that Liberals think that we can do better and hope to improve the world and move away from the current is also accurate. So that "dofus" you were listening to was exactly right.
However change doesn't by definition mean that it is better. It is simply different and that is not a synonym for improvement no matter what anybody might say.
Yes America is evolving, that cannot be questioned by a rational mind. So far there are no major changes that I don't approve of, particularly not things that the government has done directly. We'll see in a year or so. I fully expect Obama to fuck me on immigration. I could be wrong though, Bush tried and it didn't work then so maybe just maybe Congress will stop him on this. I'm half and half on Cap and Trade, it's gotten halfway there last time I checked but as the weeks drag on I suspect it has died in the Senate. America will be BETTER after the changes Obama has made.
There is however a MAJOR risk here. Something that creationists cannot grasp because they think that evolution means BETTER not more suited to their enviroment. It's a very important distinction as Polar Bears are finding out right goddamn now. Polar Bears basically are Grizzly Bears, they are close enough genetically not only to have offspring but I don't even think the are sterile. Polar Bears are great, if you live on ice and hunt seals. They SUCK outside those conditions. It is possible that Obama's America is hyperspecialized for the current conditions and much like the Mega Fauna of the Ice Age will find itself unable to compete when conditions thaw. I doubt it as most of his moves have been incredibly prudent and long over due but still it is a possibility.
Remember Evolution doesn't mean better. It means better RIGHT NOW. Cochroaches are BETTER if we are having world wide nuclear war.
It's good to see you too.
Lets be fair Darwin for all his brilliance lacked a century and a half of extensive research into his plan. I'm shocked that he was close enough to right that he can still be quoted and even him if you are giving him a fair shake understood the difference between better suited and BETTER. It is clear from his descriptions of the several species of highly specialized species of finch on the islands. If Evolution was as simple as better there would have been a single finch. A SUPER FINCH capable of doing everything. That's not what happened and not what he observed nor what he reported on. He was infact very clear that each species of Finch had its own ecological niche that it was specialized for. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if that niche vanishes creatures that are hyperspecialized to it will fail. (I again quote Polar Bears and shrinking Ice Caps) Because they aren't better, they are better at job x.
The Band Aids as you call them that FDR applied weren't removed for a reason. The system was inherently unstable. More so than anybody really cares to notice but the Great Depression wasn't unique. It wasn't even the biggest depression in history or even in the last say hundred fifty years it was merely the best recorded/reported. Sorta like Vietnam wasn't the bloodiest war of recent history but there were no cameras and reporters to tell EXACTLY what happened in WW2. They were like clock work, you could set your clock to the depression. Fifteen years give or take and the system collapses under it's own weight. FDR fixed the system and as a result we didn't have the same problems occur for over half a century.
Calling what FDR did damaging to the US as a whole is like calling the UN damaging. I might think they could do MUCH better than they do but I think a One World Government is a great idea, sadly one we aren't ready for but a great idea nonetheless. The fact is that look at history, up until that point what every fifteeen to twenty years (often coinciding with depressions which make people more willing to buy propaganda) everybody got together threw a war and redrew the maps.
Obama has been open an honest on all but a few issues. Unless by sink your teeth into your expecting him to come down and personally speak to you and your family then you can hardly have more and if you check my posts particularly the recent ones I'm not a sycophant. When I think he's fucked up I'm not shy about saying I think he's handled problem X incorrectly or I'm currious about plan Y.
I also gave Bush benefit of the doubt if you recall. If I didn't know he was wrong (or at least strongly suspect) I assumed he was right because he has access to information that I don't.
For the record I compare economies with ecologies because they are simply too complex for anybody to truly understand. We can make educated guesses, run computer models but in the end it's a crap shoot. There are simply too many factors acting to be calculated for. Nobody knows what will happen when you release a new species into the wild or what will happen when a new government regulation hits the market. To claim we KNOW isn't arrogance, it's lying. There is the Theory of Gravity or the Theory of Evolution which is arrogance based on the idea that if you can't prove me wrong I must be right (which all it actually proves is that you're the smartest man in the room) and the simple fact that horses that escape(d) in Africa have never been able to acheive stable populations and nobody even in Africa rides Zebra into battle.
Ecos work on rules so complex that we are unable to properly comprehend. They are truly amazing.
Most genuises are weird. Micheal Jackson was a pedophile. That has less than no effect on the fact that he is if one of not THE most talented musician of the last century. The only thing that can even claim to compete would be the Beatles and that was four talented men.
I didn't argue that Obama would change his stance on certain things as he both came to have that extra information that had been kept from him AND as he was elected. I'm surprised he hasn't shifted on more things but tis early yet.
We do need some new ideas, but for the most part the system works the way we have it. My point about FDR's fixes not being undone is if they hadn't been undone we would have a depression in the 60s. We had a recession in the 80s on schecule but not a full scale depression. And then we had damn near thirty years of growth. Interesting factoid the fall that we are in happened exactly 8 years after Clinton took off JUST ONE of the band aids that FDR put. Just one.
In the end they were not bandaids they were improvements. Like airbags or seatbelts.
The nation wasn't founded on Christian ideals btw and every single time dating back to the Barbary Wars. Infact every single time we are asked if we are a Christian nation the answer is always the same no. You claim that our laws are based around the Christian Ten Commandments which is true, but it's twisting facts. That is simply where the group of guys writing the laws first heard those concepts. Every nation on earth (and debatably many animals in fact) have laws against murder, theft, and infidelity. If you don't figure this rules out on your own you're people kill each other everybody dies your society ends and nobody lives to tell about it. Evolution, not God.
The current economy is based on a strange combination of things but the basis of it is Love if such a thing is real. It will stand as long as humans do because to reject it leads to death and we are self serving.
As for my friend she was doing well up until about a month ago, I can only presume she's doing less well right now as she hasn't written me in a while. For reasons I can't fully grasp but I'm starting to suspect means she wants closure my ex started writing me about a week ago.