Posted by Teryn Norris on June 26, 2009 at 12:15 AM

Projected Impact on U.S. Emissions:

1. EPA Projects Coal Will Expand Under Waxman-Markey
2. EPA Projects Waxman-Markey Would Not Require Emissions Reductions Through 2020
3. CBO Projects Waxman-Markey Would Cut Cumulative Emissions Only 2% Through 2020
4. Waxman-Markey's Non-Binding Emissions "Cap"
5. Emissions "Cap" May Let U.S. Emissions Continue to Rise Through 2030
6. Strategic Reserve May Allow "Cap" to Rise by 10 Percent, Introduce Billions More Offsets

Clean Energy Deployment & Renewable Electricity Standard:

1. Understanding EPA's Analysis of the ACES Renewable Electricity Standard
2. EPA Projects Fewer Renewables Under Waxman Markey than Business As Usual
3. UCS Analysis Finds Waxman-Markey RES Won't Increase Clean Energy Deployment
4. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Confirms Breakthrough's Analysis of Renewable Electricity Standard
5. Renewable Electricity Standard Severely Weakened; May Have Little to No Impact

Allowance Allocations and Clean Energy Investment:

1. ACES Allowance Allocation Update
2. Waxman-Markey Puts Ratepayers at Risk
3. Smart Provisions Could Spur Clean Technology - If They Are Funded
4. Foreign Offsets Receive 2.5 Times More Money than U.S. Clean Energy
5. Clean Energy R&D Investment May Be 30 Times Smaller than President Obama's Budget
6. Waxman-Markey Gives Nearly 5 Times More to Polluters than Clean Energy
   

Full Collection by Order:

Climate Bill Analysis Part 18: Understanding EPA's Analysis of the ACES Renewable Electricity Standard

Climate Bill Analysis Part 17: ACES Allowance Allocation Update

Climate Bill Analysis Part 16: EPA Projects Fewer Renewables Under Waxman Markey than Business As Usual

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 15: EPA Projects Coal Will Expand Under Waxman-Markey

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 14: Waxman-Markey Puts Ratepayers at Risk

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 13: EPA Analysis Projects Waxman-Markey Would Not Require Emissions Reductions Through 2020

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 12: CBO Projects Waxman-Markey Would Cut Cumulative Emissions by Just 2% Through 2020

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 11: New UCS Analysis Finds Waxman-Markey RES Won't Increase Clean Energy Deployment

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 10: Smart Provisions Could Spur Clean Technology - If They Are Funded

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 9: Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Confirms Breakthrough's Analysis of Renewable Electricity Standard

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 8: Waxman-Markey's Non-Binding Emissions "Cap"

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 7: Renewable Electricity Standard Severely Weakened; May Have Little to No Impact

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 6: Strategic Reserve May Allow "Cap" to Rise by 10 Percent, Introduce Billions More Offsets

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 5: Foreign Offsets Receive 2.5 Times More Money than U.S. Clean Energy

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 4: Emissions "Cap" May Let U.S. Emissions Continue to Rise Through 2030

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 3: Waxman-Markey eliminates key offset provision, increasing domestic offset use, lowering allowance prices

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 2: Clean Energy R&D Investment May Be 30 Times Smaller than President Obama's Budget

Climate Bill Analysis, Part 1: Waxman-Markey Gives Nearly 5 Times More to Polluters than Clean Energy