travelr712's tags:

The page you were looking for no longer exists

Back in the 80's, I bought a used Firebird. It was a beautiful car, I got allot of compliments. I bought it from a licensed chevy/pontiac dealer who had been in business for decades and was well respected in our town. The dealership had its own garage filled with certified mechanics. The car came with a sticker that said it had been throughly inspected for quality and passed all the tests. Now, I don't know much about cars, I have to rely on those people who are certified that they know about cars to tell me if what I'm buying is a good one or a bad one.
 
A month after I bought my sweet ride, the engine stopped. An electronic module blew up inside, and the engine had to be replaced. A month after that, the same thing happened to the transmission. A month after that, the brake system master cylinder crapped out. Even though the car lot paid for half the repairs (on my insistance and threats of legal action), it still cost me an additional $3000 to keep my shiny new ride on the road.
 
Now, I don't know if that sales lot just had a bunch of inept mechanics that did the once over, or that they knew they were selling me a lemon. All I know is that I went to a reputable place with all the right papers and certifications, and what I got was a shiny exterior around a piece of crap.
 
I told that story to tell you this one :-D
 
I've heard people blame the housing market for the economic meltdown we're in the grip of right now. While that market did play its part, it was not actually the culpret. Let me explain.
 
You see, the government had this plan to get people with not so good credit into their own houses, so they set up loans through the government housing loan agencies. This caused the housing market to start to rise which caused housing prices to start to rise. Other banks saw an increase in the real estate market and began to make their own loans to people with poor credit. As a side note, some of them were loaning money to people who had already demonstrated that they had a poor understanding of financial matters to buy houses that were far too expensive with little or no down payment and very small monthly payments. For the first 3 to 5 years. What they hid from these borrowers was that after this 3 to 5 years, their payments would tripple or more. This is called predatory lending. You see, those banks had this brilliant idea that since the housing market was so strong, they could make these loans, get a few years of payments (and commissions), forclose when the balloon payments hit, take as much as they could from the borrowers at bankruptcy, and sell the house again. It was their way of 'flipping a house'. They made money hand over fist.
 
Enter the major financial institutions. These were not banks, they were investment firms which had recently been deregulated to be able to carry mortgages and bundle them in with low risk investments in what's called a derivative. These firms were also commissioned to rate these derivitives. So, these firms bought these high risk mortgages, packaged them in with other low risk investments, stamped a AAA rating (saying it's the best low risk investment), and sold them to people all over the world. They made money hand over fist.
 
People all over the world invested in these derivitives because they were from well respected American financial institutions who had been in business for decades that certified these derivitives as being a great deal. And hey, these financial institutions had been labled by Wall Street and others as 'too big to fail' (can you say 'titanic'?), so they gotta be good, right? The financial firms said yeah, let's sell them all over the world, and it'll share the risk, if a few of them fail, it won't cause a major problem in any large sector.
 
So along goes the world economy, fat dumb and happy, making money hand over fist. And then, something strange started to happen. But I'll get to that in a minute.
 
Enter the oil futures speculators. They start buying up oil futures contracts like they were oxygen tanks in a sinking submarine. The price of oil skyrockets. The price of gas skyrockets. Since almost everything, including food, airlines, mail, shoes, nintendo's and nail polish rely on gas to be transported, those prices started to skyrocket. Suddenly, that family that took the $300,000 mortgage for $500 a month couldn't even make that payment anymore. The families that took the $120,000 mortgage for $1200 a month couldn't either. They needed electricity or their kids would be taken away by CPS. They needed food. They needed gas for their car to get to work. But all these things cost twice what they did when they took out the mortgage, and their salaries had stayed the same. Funny how investment firms, stock brokers, oil companies and futures speculators were making money hand over fist, but John Q Public hadn't had a raise in 3 years, isn't it?
 
Now, here's the strange part. Back in '07, a really odd thing started to happen. Insurance companies started going bankrupt. And it wasn't just one or two, it was a slide up the chain, and the largest ones were starting to look shaky. Why was this happening? Remember the financial firms that packaged all those high risk mortgages in AAA derivatives? Well, they went to the insurance companies and said hey, we want to take out policies on our derivatives. The insurance companies looked at the large, well respected, decades old firms who had the certifications and said hey, if you wanna throw money at us, who are we to argue?
 
When prices started to rise, those mortgages, which were the foundation of the derivatives, began to fail. Since the housing market was beginning to fail, the financial institutions couldn't flip those houses (which were quickly losing their value), so they began to collect on the insurance. It became such a stampede that the insurance companies went bankrupt. With no insurance pool to draw on, the financials had to start dipping into their own reserves. But since they were unregulated, they didn't have to have deposits with the FDIC that matched the money from their investors the way the banks that make the mortgage loans have to have for their depositors. So very quickly, their own wells ran dry. Soon, these major american cornerstone financial institutions ran out of money, because they were backing derivatives that were worth a third of face value or less, due to the overwhelming default of the high risk mortgages they'd packaged in them and stamped a AAA on. They had no more money to lend, couldn't pay off their debts or dividends, and were facing bankruptcy themselves.
 
That's where TARP began. Because investment firms all over the world had invested in these 'toxic assets', and now the assets that they showed on their books were worth only a third of what they were a year before, they started going under too. Remember the 'shared risk' idea? And since the government is the one that certifies the institutions that are allowed to use the AAA stamp, they needed to do something fast or all the major financial institutions in America would collapse, distroying our economy, taking the economies of those other countries with us, and distroying the government's credibility on the world market.
 
And guess what? The financial firms that caused this fiasco knew they were holding toxic assets, that's why they took out insurance on AAA rated investments.
 
This is a case of blatent fraud, of a ponzi scheme the size of which hasn't been seen since the 1920's, of irresponsibility in so many facets of the market, where John Q public has no way to understand its workings and can only rely on the government's backing of the institutions certified that they know what the hell they're doing. People all over the country and all over the world had bought a shiny pontiac firebird that looked great on the outside, got compliments from everyone, and was a piece of shit under the hood. And Lehman brothers, AIG, CITIGROUP, and the rest of them, knew it.
 
Now, I didn't use allot of names of government bills, or financial institutions, etc. to fill out this story, those are all over the web if you want to know who the individual players are. But that wasn't my purpose here. I also didn't add in the credit markets who had their own hand in predatory lending and incredible rate hikes with no notice, which is another branch of our economy that's frozen and causing us grief. I didn't talk about credit swaps, or a couple other less important factors. Feel free to add any in yourself.
 
My purpose here was to show where this 'crisis' really came from, the major financial institutions, how they got themselves and the rest of us in such a mess, and why the government, after taking the brakes off that had been put there specifically to keep this sort of thing from happening, got involved in such a big way.
 
Hope you enjoyed my little essay on why the 'free market' system doesn't work, and that you understand a little better what's happened to our world's economy in the past 2 years.
 
As always, if you let the wolves guard the hen house, you'll end up with no chickens.


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • queenparanoia said on Jun 11, 2009....

    that was long.... really long. but i understand a bit of it... well a little, little bit...

    but i understand your point. do you think the econom will get back to its feet with the damage done?

  • uniquely-ironic said on Jun 11, 2009....
    The fact of the matter is that the average american is poorly educated when it comes to finances.  They don't understand (sometimes on purpose) how loans work, credit scores, and even the market in general.  The banks tooks us for a ride for sure, but the people that are now in trouble were willing victims for the most part.  If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
  • cuppajava said on Jun 11, 2009....
    Good post Trav - i made it all the way to the bottom by the way -and the same thing is happening here in SA.To be able to have a demand,you need to be able to create a supply,and one of the easiest ways to create the demand,is to make the finance seem more affordable,which it obviously isnt.So they make 'affordable' home loans for the less credit worthy and entice them to go out and buy property,and so the cycle continues
  • fragglesrock said on Jun 11, 2009....
    sorry, you actually lost me when you paired up the words "80's" and "firebird" together...but i'll try again later ;)
  • trav said on Jun 11, 2009....
    Long winded!
  • ABOVE_TOP_SECRET said on Jun 11, 2009....
    You must have a brain to read my posts, but I do have boobs to be seen if you consider Bush a boob!
  • doortoinsanity said on Jun 11, 2009....
    GOOD POST!

    I read all of it, and enjoyed it!  If people find their finances to be unimportant, the people who know finances have the capability to destroy them. 

    And rake in the $$$$$$$$$$.

    As for your Firebird,
    MODIFY!!!!!!

    last line rocked!  Like letting Hitler babysit jewish people...
  • doortoinsanity said on Jun 11, 2009....
    OMG!  NAIL POLISH?

    What has this world come too?

  • wolfafterurazz said on Jun 11, 2009....
    LMFAO@fraggs..........America.......land of the free.....home of the brave..........bend over sucker your my slave........I'm going to submit that for our new Income Tax slogan
  • MsStar39 said on Jun 11, 2009....
    I read it and it's a great post trav, you explained the mess we are in very well.
  • Cussane said on Jun 12, 2009....
    Good post, however 1 thing has been left out, what about the personal responsibility of the people who bought the homes knowing they couldn't afford it, i have a buddy (yes really i do) who was in Mississippi had a nice house and sold it and moved to Florida and bought a paltial house, went from a 150k mortgage to a 500k mortage with no change in income level, tell me how that works, dont blame the banks, there theory was in 5 years or so when you have to renew your morgage you would be making more money, have your bills paid off, maybe less expenses because the kids are gone  etc etc etc, which works well in theory until the same people go out and buy new cars, toys etc using the house as equity, end result way more debt than they can handle and bankruptcy. and dont forget a lot of these "teaser" morgages were issued in 2007 and will come due for renewal in 2010, still more bad shit to come.
     
    Cussane
  • doortoinsanity said on Jun 12, 2009....
    cuss It was brought up.

    I seen it everyday for years. In fact, I helped fuzzy the already FUZZY numbers of the pricks so they could ALL get buy with it. Audits, they still have audits. Then there are people like me. NEVER had a bad audit. Never. I just got sick of cleaning up and moving money around after a bunch of people that didn't give a shit. I lost my stomach for it.

    The stories I could tell...
  • travelr712 said on Jun 12, 2009....
    there were many things i didn't bring up in this post. the fact that banks made loans to people without verifying income or references. the people who would take out a mortgage, buy a property, rent it out, and then default on the loan so that the renter, even though they had paid their rent, got thrown out on the street with all their stuff. the people who would use false names and information, borrow the money, and then when the bank went to forclose, they found the person didn't exist. and yes, the people who should have known there's no free ride. but my point is, if all of these terrible lending and borrowing practices were the only thing that was going on, the economic burst would have been localized to only that sector of the market in america. it wouldn't have been a world wide meltdown, and it wouldn't have involved other areas such as the insurance industry. remember the dot com burst in 2001? yes, that hit the market pretty hard, but it was nothing like we're seeing today, because it was a problem localized to one sector of the market. the local and regional banks didn't care who they lent the money to, because they knew the large financials would buy those mortgages. if those financials would have put the correct risk rating on those assets, they wouldn't have sold nearly as many as they did. if the banks that wrote the mortgages had followed their standard practices of checking the people out, they woudn't have written the mortgages. and yes, the dow woudn't have gained 3000+ points in 3 years, but as we can all now see, it shoudn't have. so yes, it was stupidity on the part of the borrowers, it was negligance on the part of the lenders, but the most damaging aspect of this whole fiasco was, as always, it was fraud on the part of the trusted financials.
  • doortoinsanity said on Jun 12, 2009....
    The insurance industry has a role in there also. it's called title insurance.
  • travelr712 said on Jun 12, 2009....
    yes, i spoke in part about the insurance industry and their complicity, but did not expound ity, because my focus of this article was the 'ground zero' of our current crisis, the unregulated investment banks. i would also add that title insurance only involves the propertie's title, which is the stated rights and evidence of ownership of the property. it guards against defects in these titles. it does not apply to the mortgages those properties were purchased with.
     
    i also did not speak about short selling, which is the ability for a broker to borrow shares from his clients with no investment from himself, often without their concent, sell those shares on the market, and buy them back when the share price drops, thus making a profit. now, the problem with short selling is that a broker can watch the market, pick a stock who's prices are falling, sell his client's shares thereby increasing the number of available shares and further driving the prices down, and purchase them back when those shares are at the bottom. this amounts to the broker stealing money from his clients. because of this, the uptick rule went into effect in 1938, you could only sell short if the stock price was on the rise. that way, the broker takes a risk. if the price does not fall below the value he sold the shares at originally, when his margin is called, he must cover the difference from his own pocket. however, in 2007, the uptick rule was removed. we all saw the meteoric crash of the market driven by short sellers, because they had no risk, only profits to gain.  

Comment on "How many chickens?"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)