People like the goon have totally ruined this place.it was a great site once upon a time. Alas...past tense. Now it seems it is the haunt of a Platoon of micro minds. Pathetic little people (not EVERY ONE here is in this class, - ya gonna cut and edit that too Mooney?) Creatures who,for some obscure reason take delight in attacking decent people. No cause,no rhyme or reason have launched a campaign of lies deceit and treachery. Effectively they are cyber social terrorists.( what else would you call them?) It is high time the decent people here stopped tolerating this behaviour . It is high time the decent people here (and I know that is the majority) ostracized the pathetic few. They are sociopaths = Someone with a sociopathic personality; a person with an antisocial personality disorder ('psychopath' was once widely used but has now been superseded by 'sociopath') This behaviour is not free speech, it is intolerable lunacy. I supposed they are to be pitied but surely not encouraged. Come on S.C. where is our social conscience...lets do something about it. I expect I will be attacked, belittled, ridiculed and mis quoted here but not bt decent people.
The page you were looking for no longer exists
rupert7 posted on May 13, 2009
| views: 239
Comments
-
Hegemone said on May 13, 2009....
I suppose this might be about Moon's post that I missed recently because I've been trying to stay out of this war that's brewing. Either way, what is it that you're wanting us to do? Stand up and argue with people like this, or not read them? I, for one, am not going to argue unless it seems I have a worthy contribution. Not reading, well, that's nothing new considering I usually don't know what to say to posts that come off the way you're describing. I tend to just stay out of it because the less attention it receives, the quicker it might go away. -
rupert7 said on May 13, 2009....
Hege...I agree in theory but in practice ignoring does not work! I would suggest leaving here and going somewhere else but if everyone did that,it would just spread this cancer. I think maybe we should try and pressure admin into banning anyone who behaves in this manner.I suppose they would just come back under a different name.Just as white ants will destroy a building,so nasties will eventuall destroy this site. Its getting worse and worse here! -
Hegemone said on May 13, 2009....
Yes, it is, but I know what'll happen if we all bother admin about it ... nothing, and that's after logical and somewhat educated thinking. The guy, or people, working on this site do it in their spare time more or less, as I've gathered, and really probably don't have the time to put into it. So there would be outcries, yes, and then apologies from whomever runs this place that they can't do anything about it. Then of course, even if some miracle happened and they DID get rid of the riff raff, who's to decide WHO is the riff raff, innocent people could be affected, that would have to be an extensive decision process. Then beyond that, as you mentioned, whoever got booted would just come back with another screen name. To prevent that, the process for joining the site in the first place would have to get more extensive and security based. That said, it is so hard to leave a place that's become so cozy and comfortable and start fresh elsewhere. I'm sure there are plenty of others who would have no interest in doing so and most likely, if it came down to leaving, wouldn't go elsewhere, they'd just go all together. Personally, I'm rooted here, and I don't want to leave. Another suggestion though, perhaps, is instead of people leaving here and going elsewhere ... get some more quality bloggers on THIS site. Believe me Rupe, I'm not arguing with you that people like that should have any rights to slam others and spread their falacies ... BUT, there has to be some other solution, I'm even racking my brain trying to think of something. Then at the end of it, perhaps there is a solution that will only work for each individual, and it's up to them to decide. -
rupert7 said on May 13, 2009....
Hedge....I came here two years and a bit ago and I have seen SC steadily decline.I spend most (nearly all) of my time on another site now.Its a decent place. I won't say where because I don't want the cancer spreading there. Mind you the admin there is really on the ball. I came across a scammer,deported it to admin and within 10 minutes got a message back that simply said "GOT 'EM." -
HollyGoLightly said on May 13, 2009....
my darling *gallant *rupe*~~you said you were donning sword and armour, but *wow*!! you are fabulous when it comes to defending righteousness!! cudos to you oh mighty swordsman!!
i do have an agreement with you *rupe*, stated here, and of course it will probably be cut to ribbons like everything else, and put back in some maniacal kind of order which only makes sense to the trained monkeys at the zoo...
however, i refuse to give up my right to free speech...so on i charge...my agreement is this...i have certainly learned through this experience who my "true" friends are and aren't...i have to say, the non-committal attitude of some, the "as long as it's not happening to me" outlook, the ills of society evident right here on these pages, as "rubberneckers" go by...(ones who like to look at tragic accidents for fun), and those who plead to "stay out of it" for fear of...what? to keep the rot from their own blog ? well, can't blame them there...but there was something to be said for friendship...there was...and to those who remained great friends through this ridiculousness...i say *thank you* your hearts are true...
and that, of course includes you, my dear, dear friend...
(((((hugs))))))
*~*Holly*~*
-
ALIENated said on May 13, 2009....
I will have to admit, I never read the moon. I am pretty sure he is also TheNuttyNakedProfessor and his band of alts, but he claims not to be. So I have no idea what you are talking about. If I am part of the problem, let me know. I just like to bash BHO and liberals. I know I sometimes go a little overboard, but it usually just reflects what is said to me. And I have almost zero tolerance for Jesus bashing.
-
crybabylu said on May 14, 2009....
I don't know what to add but wanted to let you know, I read your post. Sending good thoughts your way.....Dee. -
superbozo said on May 14, 2009....
G'Day rupe, I seem to have missed this. I had to go see what it was you were on about.
Holly you can hold your head up high babe. I think the post says more about the gOOn. (great stuff rupe)
I don't think admin will do anything after all they push the uncensored blogging. It sounds a cop out but I just don't buy into it. I know the good people that do come here will not buy into it either. Some commented on that blog and the general consensus of the comments showed that most supported Holly.
-
Hegemone said on May 14, 2009....
Well in the end I just feel it's all a terrible shame, but Rupe, I'm glad I got to read you a little bit before you went to the other site, which I'm sure is wonderful. As far as Holly, I'm really growing attached to her as well, BUT I will say this, as was a point Uni brought up in a recent post ... I'm staying out of it for the most part unless my help is actually needed. I know that by far I'm not Holly's best friend, we just barely know one another ... and I don't want to insult her with overstepping and assuming she can't kick ass and take names on her own. SO, that said, I'm still keeping an eye on the issue and I have now read Moon's post, by the way, I don't think my comment left there was all so bad, but I do need to investigate to see what sorts of rammifications it pulled. -
CreativeWoman said on May 14, 2009....
I'm not quite sure what you are referring to, but all I will say is don't feed the trolls, whomever they may be. They are like fire. They need fuel to grow. The way to stop them is to ignore them.
I've seen this sort of thing happen before and have been on the fringes of it. Engagement only makes it worse.
CW
-
Hegemone said on May 14, 2009....
CW - Thank you, those were my initial sentiments as well. -
uniquely-ironic said on May 14, 2009....
Not going to engage in this one. Unless asked of course. The problem with engaging with shit disturbers is that it feeds their need for attention. -
HollyGoLightly said on May 14, 2009....
now see, with regard to this specific situation, i basically felt it to be made into a very public, and well-known slaughter-and-fed-to-the-wolves situation...the wolves speaking loudly, while the lambs begged indifference...
i have to disagree with a few opinions here...nothing personal at all (!) please (!) we can agree to disagree right?
just as i would never stand by and watch someone i had claimed friendship to be beaten down in public, nor would i stand by here, and watch someone i had claimed as a friend, be humiliated and publicly eviscerated, especially if i knew the person's character, especially if i knew the person was being unfairly crucified...
i've done it before, and would do it again...personal risk? yes, i guess so, but what price is that compared to standing up for what you believe in? righting wrongs? speaking for justice? just as in real life, problems do not go away simply because we ignore them...a good friend recently said this to me,
"all evil needs to reign, is for good people to sit back and do nothing"...
that WAS NOT in relation to this specific situation (let's make that point! as anymore, it seems nearly all i say is taken out of context...) but it IS a true and relevant point, when you consider it...
*~*Holly*~*
-
HollyGoLightly said on May 14, 2009....
ahh, i see i was incorrect...we obviously cannot agree to disagree...as on it goes...
obviously this previously comment has caused offense...well, that's too bad..as was stated, it was NOT personal, apparently that doesn't count for anything...whatever....no one here is asking for sympathy, for "special" regard...i was simply blogging my own opinion (which last time i checked was still my right, unless they changed it while i was off in real life somewhere...)
and my opinion stands...it was not a cry for "special consideration", nor "dispensation"...only a thought addressed to the blogger and a few comments here, which is what this "comment" box is for...
only relating the situation to real life circumstances, where i stated what i, in particular would do...i see nothing wrong with standing up for what i believe in, whether it is mine or another's personal "battle"...like i said, i would never in real life stand by and watch someone beaten to a pulp...why would i do that here?
and if this is offensive, you have my apologies, whomever you are that takes it that way...you will be amongst quite a group, as it seems EVERYTHING i put down here to these pages is taken with meaning not intended, and no one ever seems to ASK the meaning when they are "offended"...they just feel pissed off...well, that's the way it goes, doesn't it...
there's always the option of NOT clicking over....that would work nicely...
convictions...interesting things...
*~*Holly*~*
*rupe*~~you began with good intention...i hope you don't mind my responding here
-
travelr712 said on May 14, 2009....
rupert, you are my friend, so i really hope you won't take what i say as an affront to you, it's not meant to be.did you read hollygolightly's post that moon platoon was referring to in his blog? i did. it was very clear that holly became hostile toward him when he was being pretty congenial and definately not confrontational. i've read many other public posts by her where she ridicules others with open hostility and condescention. i don't know if they deserved that treatment or not, but they are there. now i guess i see it like this. some people say that when another blogger treats you like that, just 'turn the other cheek', ignore it, them, and go on with your life. others think that if someone throws a rock at you, you can throw a rock back at them.you called moon and others 'social cyber terrorists' for making the comments he did. but wouldn't that put people like holly, heronlymaster, masterscumslut, and others i could name in the same category for making just as inflamatory statements about him? and really, wouldn't that put you in the category too, because that's what you've done with this post, made inflamatory statements about moon? now believe me, i'm not defending moon, he can take care of himself. but i have seen specific patterns here that maybe you've missed.moon only stated his own opinion, in his rather odd way, of the situation he went through. he cited specific examples. they can be verified publically by anyone who cares to. and he did this all on his own.holly, however, (who i will remind you cast the first stone in her very public post), made this statement on this very post:just as i would never stand by and watch someone i had claimed friendship to be beaten down in public, nor would i stand by here, and watch someone i had claimed as a friend, be humiliated and publicly eviscerated, especially if i knew the person's character, especially if i knew the person was being unfairly crucified...calling for all to 'come to her aid', asking for members to choose sides, and saying anyone who doesn't is basically a 'wimp'. and she also says here that she has in the past, and will again, 'jump in the fray' with barbs of her own should she see the need.now i'm not saying moon is right and holly is wrong, or vice versa. what i'm saying is that their behavior is pretty much the same, so if one is a 'social cyber terrorist', isn't the other? or is there some reason that holly's behaving in this manor is acceptable and moons behaving in a similar manor is not?again rupert, you're my friend, and i really don't want to sound harsh toward you, but this topic of 'acceptable behavior' has become of interest to me of late.as to the practice of 'banning', well, as sb pointed out, this is an uncensored blog site. anyone can say anything they want that is not illegal. if you are going to publically post here, you are going to publically open yourself up to that, so you'd better be ready for it. alienated said he doesn't allow 'jesus bashing' on his site. he finds it offensive, so i dare say that he or those with like attitudes would work to have anyone who 'jesus bashes' banned. he also says he bashes the president and liberals, so those who support the president or liberal ideals would work to have him banned. you see, alienated wants to be able to take advantage of the uncensored environment here, but he is unwilling to pay the cost. if he can say anything he wants, then so can everybody else. and it's the same for holly, or mcs, or you, or me. if we all want a forum to express whatever we want to express, we all better put on our 'big girl panties' and stop getting bent when someone says on our public posts, something we don't like, don't you think? -
HollyGoLightly said on May 14, 2009....
here we go again, for someone who claims "not wanting to get into it" *trav*~~ you sure have alot to say, both here and there...and (btw) interesting:
have YOU been the one chased all over sc from blog to blog by that idiot...NO
so how could you possibly KNOW...truly...JUST WHAT was actually said and done
over an entire weeks worth of postings which HE HAS NOT included in his little diatribe on me...(including postings that DO NOT EVEN EXIST ANYMORE...SO HOW COULD ANYONE MAKE AN EDUCATED DECISION??)
So, YOUR knowledge, as is everyone else's BUT MINE AND HIS is at best: inadequate, based on hearsay (his or mine), second-hand, and unfairly-biased...
you (as are alot of others) making judgment calls without all the facts...and most likely it is satisfactory for you to do so, as you and i do not agree about anything anyway...
i said before that i would not respond further to his comments, nor anyone else's...however, even though i do not have anything to EXPLAIN AWAY, (apparently the misconception is that i do...wrong...defending one's self is not necessarily because one is guilty...) ANSWER TO OR FOR, NOR APOLOGIZE ABOUT ( I CERTAINLY WILL NOT )...i did not sink so low as to that level of darkness...filthy name-calling...ridiculous copying and pasting...i have not put any energy into FUELING hate...my responses were stating facts, and corresponding to misunderstandings:
WHICH IF ANYONE REALLY WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT - THEY COULD'VE JUST ASKED...but no one did, which shows that people just want to do tabloid blogging, believe the front page, whatever is thrust into their faces, and eagerly and blindly jump on the bandwagon, and how much sc loves to throw fuel onto a burning house...no one gives a hoot about the REAL truth...
i am sick and tired of the constant commenting of others eager to fuel the fire on this things when moon and i haven't spoken directly about it for what one day? two? who cares? i simply state that ALL THE FACTS WERE NOT THERE...
anyone who makes a call without all the facts is an ignoramus....just as one would not buy a car, a house, life insurance, or have a baby without ALL THE FACTS available to them firstly...so many have leaped into this, without knowing for which they speak...which is pure stupidity...that is just a fact of life...
how long will it take you to cut and paste this somewhere to incite more problems *trav*...? don't you think you could maybe fire up that light bulb in your brain, and blog out something of your own...you know...original...instead of feeding the frenzy here all day long?? i can't believe you have nothing better to do...maybe some "big-girl panties" to wash out...lol
at least when i comment on this...it's about my own damn business...
(and yes, you may quote me as well...quote away...) dh
(btw) i will not respond back here to you, as it is not worth any further of my time...
*~*Holly*~*
-
HollyGoLightly said on May 14, 2009....
*rupe* you are so right, darling....i shall be there (you know where) more often than not, as this place is becoming a dog pound... -
travelr712 said on May 14, 2009....
wow holly, you're talking to me again?i never once said i didn't want to get into it. i have no problem with conflict, as you have found for yourself. strange you say the original post of yours no longer exists, because i went to it just last night. but then, you also said your post that i 'copied from' didn't exist any longer either, and it's still there.holly, it doesn't matter to the point i was making who said what over how many weeks. the point i was making is that they are there, you wrote them, they are your words, your posts. you were the first one in moon's, and my, situations to become hostile, condescending, and in your own words 'rude and raw'. joke or not, those are your words. you also wrote a very hostile post about me. you are as guilty as anyone else of this type of behavior, and in both moon's and my cases, you instigated it. even after i brought it to your attention, you continued it. even after i left you completely alone, you continued it. so i did just exactly what you said you'd done to me. i answered 'in kind'. i took one of the phrases you yourself used on numerous public posts and comments before and since, and said it back to you word for word in a (as you stated to me in a comment) 'tongue in cheek' manor. you were treated by me, on that public post, exactly the same way you treated me, and you found that treatment to be unacceptable. you wrote a hostile post about me, but you find it objectionable when others write them about you. your 'friends' have made very harsh, slanderous comments all over this site about myself and moon, which you support, and even call for here in this post, but you find it objectionable when anyone else writes comments of that nature about you. you say in your comment above that i do not have all the facts, and anyone who comments without all the facts is an ignoramous, which is a very inflamitory statement toward me. you did this in response to me using your name in my comment, which you found objectionable. do i need to list other examples?this is the behavior i am talking about holly, and it is not just you doing it, there are others here. if you find that type of behavior to be objectionable in others, then is it not just as objectionable in yourself, no matter who 'started it'? or is there some unwritten rule that says some people have the right to do it and also have the right not to expect it to be reciprocated? if you really pay attention to what i write, leaving your emotions aside, you may see it there. and believe me holly, if you have a problem with me, i welcome you to state it. you still can come to my blog and say anything you like about my behavior, my views, my character. but i would ask that you answer my question. why is this behavior acceptable for you to display, and not for others? -
HollyGoLightly said on May 14, 2009....
lets go S L O W L Y here...what PART EXACTLY DID YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??
(big letters for small understanding...maybe this emphasis will get the point across? then again...lol...probably not...)
don't you understand : what YOU continue saying is THE ORIGINAL POST ...
IS NOT THE ORIGINAL POST!!!
YOU ONLY THINK IT'S THE ORIGINAL POST BECAUSE YOU BELIEVED WHAT SOMEONE TOLD YOU!! (does anyone here think for themselves anymore? or did that concept go out with the ark?)
DID YOU MISS WHERE I SAID "A WKS WORTH??"
THE POSTINGS THAT STILL EXIST ARE *NOT!!* *REPEAT NOT!!!*
THE ORIGINALS!!
HOWEVER THE ORIGINALS WERE DELETED AS THEY WERE JUST AS HATEFUL AND NEGATIVE AS THE CONTINUAL CRAP THAT IS SPOKEN ON MOON PLATOON'S BLOG...
THE POSTS WERE DELETED *BEFORE* MOONPLATOON BEGAN HIS CAMPAIGN OF HATE (INSTEAD OF ONLY DISSAGREEING WITH ME)...HE DECIDED TO COPY AND PASTE AND MADE THINGS *SKEWED*TO HIS VIEW!! (and apparently all the sheep who followed him there...)
and yes, i am answering you, although i am not speaking to you, even though i said i would not, for the simple fact that...
I AM SO SICK TO DEATH OF THIS CAMPAIGN OF **MISINFORMATION*...
HOW MANY MORE* WAYS* OR *TIMES* NEED I SAY IT???
WHAT YOU GUYS SAW WAS **NOT** THE START!! (GET THAT)??
YOU CAME IN ON IT WHEN *MOON* DECIDED TO LET YOU IN ON IT...
AND SINCE IT'S TRULY NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS TO SAY ANYTHING...SHUT UP NOW...
*i for one, cannot believe how far this is gone....little minds, spinning little webs....causing HUGE trouble, then pouncing when one attempts *CLARIFICATION* of the facts...whatever...fuck off...that's my motto from now on... PRINT THAT
and yes...that's fuckin' emotional too...lol...lmao!
*~*Holly*~*
-
travelr712 said on May 14, 2009....
well of course it's my business to say anything i want to and about anyone i want on a public uncensored blog holly. that's the point of a public uncensored blog.holly, i am not ridiculing you, although you are taking it that way. and what i am about to write is not a ridicule either, it is an expression of concern. do you realize that you have a 'victim mentality'? your actions invite hostility, and then you feel victimized. your actions invite sexual predators, and then you feel victimized. if you wish people to stop treating you in that manor, then change the way you approach them.look at what you wrote here as if it were someone else, say, myself, writing it:and yes, i am answering you, although i am not speaking to you, even though i said i would not,now, the reason you gave for commenting above does not matter in this case. you stated twice you would not comment here before, and you have three times since. in this statement you say you're talking to me, even though you said you wouldn't talk to me, and you are not talking to me. does that seem like a rational thing to say and do? were someone, say myself, say that to you, would you not ridicule them for it? i know you would, because i've read you doing it. your entire comment here is hostile and condescending toward me, and you are becoming very emotionally charged about the situation, i am not.holly, these are all elements of a victim mentality. i think if you could face that in yourself, you could resolve some of the issues in your life that you have posted about. -
rupert7 said on May 14, 2009....
I wonder why the moon man has not said a single word here? Hasn't noticed this post? - bullshit! Good Aussie word there...Bullshit! Is it possible he sits chortling at the fray?....perhaps.
Hey everyone!....look what TRAV wrote, and if he denies it he must be paranoid!
holly, it matters A LOT to the point i was making who said what LAST WEEK the point i was making is that they are there and I WROTE them, they are MY WORDS, Not really your post. NODDY was the first one in moon's, and my, situations to become KISSY, WILLING, and in your own words’TERRIFIC’. joke or not, those are your words. you also wrote a very FRIENDLY post about me.
Here's the original :
holly, it doesn't matter to the point i was making who said what over how many weeks. the point i was making is that they are there, you wrote them, they are your words, your posts. you were the first one in moon's, and my, situations to become hostile, condescending, and in your own words 'rude and raw'. joke or not, those are your words. you also wrote a very hostile post about me
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRAV, my friend, Words in capitols were changed by be. See how easy it is to manipulate and misquote someone else's post? I like Holly,you say her actions invite sexual predators......is that what you think I am Trav?
You all might have noticed that i have been pretty quiet lately. I don't come here much,this is virtually a "cameo role," unlikely you will hear from me again. If you can't be nice to Holly at least leave her alone. And Holly babe, why don't you leave this hell hole,just slip back now and then and PM your friends here. Don't make public posts at all, that's my advice anyway. I won't come back here again. Leave it to the dogs of war I will.
-
travelr712 said on May 14, 2009....
i understand how easily words are changed rupert. my words were easily changed by holly when she said i was acting like a 'jilted lover'.i don't have to change any words to quote her comment earlier.So, YOUR knowledge, as is everyone else's BUT MINE AND HIS is at best: inadequate, based on hearsay (his or mine), second-hand, and unfairly-biased...*******************************
anyone who makes a call without all the facts is an ignoramus....just as one would not buy a car, a house, life insurance, or have a baby without ALL THE FACTS available to them firstly...so many have leaped into this, without knowing for which they speak...which is pure stupidity...that is just a fact of life...
you didn't see all the posts she was talking about either, so that makes you an ignoramous too by her account. and i didn't have to change a single word she said, i just had to pay attention to them.
do you really think holly can't stand up for herself? do you think she needs someone to protect her from some horrible people on the internet? do you think she never does anything wrong? i know she's your friend rupert. at least for now. and i'm not telling you to stop being friends with her. hell, i'd still be friends with her if she'd unblock me, whether she listens to my opinion or not. but you know me my friend. i say what i think, i point out what i see. i do that in real life too, it's who i am, and it's one of the things that you usually appreciate about me.rupert, this issue really isn't about holly. it isn't about moon either, or even about me. it's about what is and is not considered acceptable behavior. and again, not to be harsh, but if you look at the body of your post, you've done the same thing. no matter what your motivation was, whether it was to protect your friend, or to point out where you felt you were wronged, or whatever the motivation might be. that reason was important enough to you that you posted your words on it in a public uncensored blog where anyone can comment on them. everyone else involved in this situation did exactly the same thing. you, holly, moon, me, mcs, hom, et. al. all had harsh, condescending, critical words toward each other. should any one of us be given a 'pass' because of any particular reason?i'll also point out one more fact. no one has had any argument against my recounting of her treatment of me, including holly. so holly can also instigate trouble, just like anyone else. should she be given a pass for that behavior because, what, she's a woman? she visits you on your other blog? she's never said a harsh word to you yet?you're my friend, right? did you have anything to say to her when she wrote her post about me like you said when moon wrote his post about her? this is my ONLY point rupert. if she is portraying that type of behavior, then she is as culpable, and shoud be treated the same, as you have treated moon, shouldn't she?
-
mOOn_platOOn said on May 17, 2009....
O
You forgot to capitalize my "OO's"...
O
-
mOOn_platOOn said on May 17, 2009....
O
wOw. I just came upon this post and I must say, Holly is a true confabulator. From what I gather she's saying that I stalked her from post to post (and somehow erased those stalkings - so that means they were all on my own posts??) and that I have launched a campaign? One post a campaign makes?
Evidence anyone? Samples please? Anyone recall this stuff?
Nice to meet you rupert7. Now, if I launch a post titled RUPERT7 WILL NEVER GET TO HEAVEN will I become a "good" person like you?
Holly has out-and-out lied here. Yeah, I'm copying all of this. This is slander. This is the kind of rap only anonymous idiots can get away with upon other anonymous victims.
My concerns about this are minimal. Anyone who reads me knows I am not caught up in the dramas of SoulCast personality wars. If you don't read me you're missing a lot of fun. ALIENated would love to read me but he feels slighted because I temporarily blocked him for trying to hijack my post with his own agenda concerning alt paranoia. He should get over it and join the fun. Lots of right wingers like me (see D6 for example). I'm not just for clear-minded folk.
But Holly deserved a smack-down, because she's rude. She's a bully. She's wrapped up in her blogging narcissism and belittles those who aren't, starting on their own blogs! Talk about creating an unpleasant atmosphere.
I want her to leave me alone, and now she probably will. Frankly, rupe, you seem a little slow yourself. Or maybe you're just quick to judgment. Reconsider me. I'm more than worthwhile and unless you're actually impaired, intelligent people enjoy my blog (it's quite varied in content). We can still be civil.
But Holly? She's not stable. She erased her FUCKFUCKITYFUCKFUCK post right after I mentioned it in my notorious *~*GollyGoneStupid*~* parody (I think it's better than Saturday Night Live). I think she's embarrassed and now she's backtracking and making up a HE SAID SHE SAID scenario that never happened. This is sad and I almost feel sorry that I struck back. She's a fragile thing.
I hope she and I never cross cyber paths again. I think SoulCast should have an IGNORE feature that would make us invisible to each other.
O
-
UnicornForm said on Jul 21, 2009....
Well i didnt read all the comments..but so what if a sociopath blogs here, its an attempt to socialize. Wtf=Ftw for a reason. but really... cant we all just get along? *Jerry Springer* haha gotta love him. -
KathQuiet said on Aug 15, 2009....
Um hm looks like I've gladly missed a furious row. C'mon now. Ignore those who abuse free speech. Even negative attention lends credibility of an odd sort. Heya Rupert, you can't leave! You're such a delight. Cooking and culture. It horrible you've been offfended but be assured there are many who treasure your presence.