travelr712's tags:
do this badly, so please bear with me.
 
I've been watching the series 'from the Earth to the moon'. One thing struck me as I was watching.
 
The first Apollo rocket that was designed for the purpose of leaving the Earth and venturing to the moon caught fire on the launch pad, killing all three Astronauts. There was a huge outcry. Senator Walter Mondale tried to use this incident to bury NASA and the space program because he wanted to use the money for public programs.
 
There is an episode in this series that showed the preparations for the next launch, and all I can say is, they were intense. One more accident and the American space program was done. We would never go to the moon. The Russians would have no incentive to go to the moon. Perhaps man would have never reached the moon if that launch had not been successful. But who can deny the significance of the fact that a man set his foot down on another planet?
 
What I am getting at here is risk. Every 12 seconds, someone dies in an automobile accident. Maybe you didn't know the statistics were that high, but you certainly know that whenever you step into your car, you are taking a great personal risk that it will be the last time. And yet you still step in your car. There is no congressional investigation if you meet disaster, the automobile industry does not shut down because a few people died, it is a risk that you accept without even thinking about it.
 
Every day, countless soldiers die on battlefields all over the world. There are so many that the news barely covers these events, and usually doesn't. If you even think about it at all, you probably think that it's a tragedy, but those soldiers knew the risk when they signed up, it was their job, they accepted it. Life goes on.
 
So why is it so much more tragic when a school teacher dies in a space shuttle than when one dies on a highway, or a battlefield? the later deaths did not stop war, did not stop driving. It must be something else.
 
The space program, I believe, is so much beyond the comprehension of most people that they do not understand why people have to die to achieve these goals. Sacrificing for a dam, for a building, to stop a robbery, those are noble and heroic, and acceptible deaths, but not in the space program. After all, we got to the moon, what's the point?
 
Well, here's one point that JFK never gave us with his grand vision. Never before in the history of mankind have humans been able to leave our planet and travel to another. This is the stuff of aliens, the stuff of gods, the stuff of dreams, how can it be understood?
 
But, if we can leave this planet, learn how to colonize others, then the human race will survive long past this Earth, no matter what happens to it, we will not pass from the existence of this galaxy, our race will be immortal. I consider that a fundamental, and noble goal.
 
Humans can find resources that are not available to us on this planet, elements that we as yet do not even know exist, and use them for our betterment. That too, like penecillin and the electric motor, is a noble goal.
 
Noble goals that further the human race are NEVER without risk, NEVER achieved without ultimate sacrifice, because it is in that sacrifice that the risk is understood, the nobility realized, and the goal achieved.
 
This may sound heartless, but I believe we have not had enough tragic endings to space missions. In any great endeavor, whether it is a chicken farm, or a dam across a great river, or the highest skyscraper, or the spread of democracy, there is always death, that is the price we humans pay for our advancement. Just as with dams, chicken farms and automobiles, if enough people die in the venture, we will begin to be desensatized to individual deaths, and see a more significant goal beyond. After all, if enough people find it important enough to die for, then it must be a good thing, right?
 
The people who board these space vehicles know as much, if not more, the risk they take, and they take it willingly, with hope and smile. So if they are lost, do not morn them, that is not what they want. Do not praise them with statues, or parades, or ceremonies, because that elevates their sacrifice above the fireman who was killed trying to carry the child from the burning building. And do not fault the space program as a whole. It is made up of humans, and they have a better track record than any other human endeavor. No one has EVER died in space. Instead, honor their memories by supporting what they believed in. A better world because we are no longer bound to it.


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • CayenneMan said on Mar 17, 2009....
      Pretty good post travelr712 I enjoyed reading it. I agree with everything you said.
  • fragglesrock said on Mar 17, 2009....
    from the earth to the moon..that sounds like an interesting series
  • Hegemone said on Mar 17, 2009....
    Good post Trav, definitely something to think about ... and to be honest ... I need to grab some coffee ... I'll be right back ... OK, coffee in hand, thinking cap is now fueled.  First, I want to say that I totally agree with you.  Let's not waste time mourning those who may have passed in any space program situation, let that instead be motivation to continue the journey, so that their lives were not ended for nothing.  Also, on a fundamental level, I do feel the great need to keep our species surviving, to find another place where we can reach out, extend, continue to populate and greatly outlive this planet when it is wasted and done.  On that same note though ... you said:

    But, if we can leave this planet, learn how to colonize others, then the human race will survive long past this Earth, no matter what happens to it, we will not pass from the existence of this galaxy, our race will be immortal. I consider that a fundamental, and noble goal.

    Again, in a fundamental way I agree, I am of the 'No, I don't want to die, I want to stay right here living, breathing and experiencing!' ... but I've got an open mind today.  What if its a bad thing that our species spreads out?  Granted, we as humans have done a lot of wonderful things ... but on the same token, have we not also caused and started a lot of terrible things?  Are we not the ones using up our land's natural resources?  Are we not tearing up the planet day by day despite all out efforts to encourage the opposite of this?  Are we not constantly at war for one reason or another?  Again, we have done great things, found many cures, medicines (you mentioned penicillin even!), and ways around past obstacles.  But, just for the sake of thought ... what if we're not supposed to reach out?

    Then, here's another loop for you ... what if officials at NASA (of the highest order, naturally) and government officials know more than they let on?  What if they're two steps ahead of what they're telling the general public that they are?  Spooky thoughts, lol, but like I said, I had fuel for my thinkin' cap at this point in time!  Very awesome post Trav!
  • queenparanoia said on Mar 17, 2009....
    because some humans think what we have now is enough. they think that this is all that there is to it...

    nice post... ;-)
  • travelr712 said on Mar 17, 2009....
    thank you cman :-)
     
    very interesting fraggs, very well done. it's tom hanks and stephen spielberg, they made the series for hbo after the apollo 13 movie. it's a great overview of the race to the moon.
     
    glad you liked the post hege. i thought about the 'what if we spread our violence' angle. personally, i think that if we can actually achieve the goal of finding other habitable planets, get to them, and successfully inhabit them, then we've earned the right to do so. what happens in those societies after that is as much up to them as what happens to this world in the future is up to our great grandchildren. who knows how human conciousness, behavior, values would change if that was our reality?
     
    that's true qpdoll, some people do. fortunately the people who thought like that 600 years ago didn't stop columbus from making his historic voyage, right?
  • Lucytorial said on Mar 17, 2009....
    well said, I have this belief that if all the money spent on space were put to use here on planet earth there wouldn't be the problems and deaths that we have in such multitudes.
     
    Like a critical mass, the human race is being desensatised too all sorts of tragic events, yet we race ahead to find water on a planet that we can't use....? WFT?
     
    Its like calling a footballer a fucking hero for a touch down, how pathetic is that, yet the young boy who stopped a lady getting robbed is overlooked...
     
    We need to refocus on here, this place, under the water, in the forest, the air we breath...
  • travelr712 said on Mar 17, 2009....
    well i guess i really don't agree with you lu. before 1961, all that money for thousands of years was spent on other things than the space program, and it never solved any of those problems. i don't think that if we cancled the space program and funneled those funds into other programs, the results would be any different. i don't think going to space and setting up colonies will solve those problems either. but if we spend that money, reach mars, and set up a colony, then we'll have something tangible and lasting for that time, effort and money that will lead to the betterment of the human race, just as landing on the moon did.
  • GrapeKoolaid said on Mar 17, 2009....
    Just as a quick point of reference, a trans-oceanic voyage was a one-way trip in the 1700s.  Stephen Hawkings also pointed out that it is in the interest of the survival of the species to colonize other planets.  I wrote on this a little while back, regarding the evolutionary paths taken by the space-born as opposed to the earth bound. 

    A celestial voyage must necessarily be a multi-generational ship.  Even if FTL(faster than light) travel is achieved, the distance we must cross is (for right now) unfathomable. 

    It is in the collective destiny of humankind to colonize space.  Giving your life to the cause is nothing new. 

    Interesting stuff. 
  • travelr712 said on Mar 17, 2009....
    the facts, grape, we both understand.
     
    what has been missing is the inspiration. you and i know why this is so important. but since jfk, nobody else has been able to explain it to, or inspire, the general public, that is why we fail.
     
    someone needs to give them back the dream.
  • GrapeKoolaid said on Mar 18, 2009....
    I think it's also because we have more pressing matters that occupy the foreground of the people's mind.  The space race seems much more important when there's a foe, or a threat, you know?  Perhaps Americans will get their butt in gear once the Chinese start sending people to Mars. 

    I mean, NASA's buying their equipment on ebay because they don't even manufacture the antiquated items they use now...  [facepalm]
  • travelr712 said on Mar 18, 2009....
    good point grape, it was the race with the russians to get to the moon that kept it in the forefront of the american's minds. how many people know that there was another shuttle mission, and it's at the space station right now?

Comment on "I might"

space (Click to add tags below)

(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

i've been needy and clingy and txting him a LOT.

he hasn't said anything and hasn't complained.
but at the same time i think i can tell that even though he's not exasperated with me YET..... he doesn't miss me like i miss him. he doesn'...