It's understandable that most Americans today don't want to delve too deeply into the subject of religion.
And why not? It seems that the more devout you are, the more "wierd" or "crazy" you are. To many, being devout means you try to kill others, or yourself, to show belief. It means drilling rules into your brain so that you don't think for yourself. It means bugging people on the street with outrageous claims and requests/demands for repentance...and all you want is to shop with your family.
Religion can also mean you have built-in guilt that runs your life and stresses you out to the point where you have weird ticks or quirks. It could also mean family tradition...that "being religious" is just what you do in your household, without exception.
It all sounds so rigid, extreme, strange, and very "panties in a bunch" compared to just living a life of happiness, being a good person, doing the right thing, and so on.
What do I think? I think that all religions, when listed, are like a giant multiple choice question, and each one is a possible answer. Which one is right? I've chosen Christianity for many reasons, as others will choose a different religion for their own reasons.
That's all well and good, but what if our religion demands that we tell others about it? What's the difference between telling a person and committing religious terrorism, as it's been called?
I think the most dangerous pitfall humanity has is pride, and part of that is the desire to be right, especially about topics we care a great deal about. When we talk about such a subject with somebody, we want to talk like we know the answers, or at least to sound intelligent.
But sometimes, our existing beliefs call us to do more. To yell at others, infringe upon their beliefs, start wars, hate others, things like that.
Does that make religion evil? No. I think that people are flawed, and we make bad choices with good things. After all, water is wonderful - it's needed for life. But that doesn't mean someone can't decide to drown another in it.
Some religions are based on fact, others on philosophy, others are entirely fabricated for profit or add/change existing religions to fit personal/cultural needs.
Why is it important? Well, many religions explain where we came from and why we're here. A thought of a good diety or historical figure to give us purpose is more attractive to many than the prospect of being products of evolution, where we could have evolved in a complex and long-lasting series of steps, but it does nothing to explain the worth or goodness the human race has. Religions often explain what life is, like science, but it also explains WHY it is.
You could argue that all religions are man-made, created as a comfort tool. You'd be mostly right - most of them ARE man-made. But personally, I believe there has to be a God that serves as a standard for any other gods that were made up. Some of us even want to be our own gods. Well, how do we know what a god is if there wasn't one to define it?
If religion is based upon myth or the exploits of a man, it tends to be a tool of comfort. After all, myths can't be proven as true, and a man's accomplishments must have been extraordinary to warrant followers. But if we follow just a man, what makes that man (or woman) worthy of our offerings, prayers, devotion, worship, etc., and not another human being? If we're all on a level playing field, no human is worthy of worship any more than you yourself are. It also means that anyone who is persuasive and creative enough can create their own religion. After all, Joseph Smith was well-known for false truths and lived a turbulent life of controversy even within his own budding church of latter-day saints. L. Ron Hubbard basically admitted that starting a religion was the best way to get rich, which is no surprise considering Scientology is very much a business. Now, is that stating fact, or is it pressing my beliefs upon people? Wikipedia both those men and find out that there IS a difference.
Now, if a person takes their religion as fact, they will WANT to tell others in order to gain the benefits of the religion for them. But what if it's a lie? How do you know it's a lie? What if you went on believing something for so long that even if it's proven wrong to your face, you will hold to it?
I say all of this to challenge everyone to give religion at least 2 good hours of thought in their lifetime, so that the matter of life, where we're from, why we're here, and other things, will be explained. Some religions let you pick and choose. Some command your devotion to a higher power.
There's no question that religion can be VERY dangerous when people believe for the wrong reasons, and show it in the wrong ways. It's even worse when the core beliefs are false and wrong themselves.
Any living person should seek answers for themselves, no matter how long they've been in (or out of) church/mass/meditation/etc. There would be nothing worse than living a lifetime assuming this is all there is to existence, only to find yourself utterly unprepared for the afterlife you either ignored or refused to believe.
It brings to mind the simple saying about dying and going to Heaven: If I believe in God and you don't, and He does NOT exist, we both win. But if I believe in God and you don't, and He DOES exist, then you lose.
It's not worth taking that chance. Find out for yourself. But know that in order to do that, most of us have to disregard the horror stories of all the evils people have done in the name of religion. They made their choices - now you must make yours. It can be said we make our beds in life, and when we die we have to lay in it. There are religions with truth in them, and some are false. Just remember, it is possible that one of them is TRUE no matter what you think or believe. Keep an open mind that religion is too important a thing to choose out of convenience - many suffer and die for what they believe (those that die at the hands of others), so picking a religion to fit in or look good is surface stuff compared to the real value and meaning.



