hotaka's tags:

Alright, it comes as no surprise that there is a lot of absolute bullshit on the Net. Fake stories and fake photos find there way into my mailbox often enough. The stories are sometimes almost believable until someone directs my attention to a site that claims to debunk the bunk. So many of the stories are BS that I don’t bother to forward any of those bleeding heart stories that claim I have no heart of I don’t forward them. All keyboards have a delete button for a very good reason.

While there are many incredible things in the world and in nature, and there are many incredible photographs on the Net, some that have come my way were clearly faked, easily recognizable not because they were poorly created but because I knew of the location or the original photograph.

Let’s take the example of the tornado and lightning flash beyond an oil refinery. The story accompanying the photo was that a worker went out to photograph the lightning and when it flashed he got the shot, and only then did he see that a tornado was bearing down on the refinery. Photo aside, the story is absolute rubbish. All accounts I have ever read about tornados is that they make a noise like a freight train coming through. Standing outside the worker surely would have heard it. Also, if a tornado was heading straight for an oil refinery I am sure someone would have heard about it on the radio, seen it approaching, or been notified. That anyone would be still working away with danger so near is a hard nut to swallow.

But what gave the story away as a fabrication for me was that the photo of the tornado and lightning bolt is a well-known and often published photo that was captured back in the 90s. It was on the cover of a 1995 Earth magazine issue and has appeared in subsequent journals and texts that use it as an illustration. The refinery image was simply superimposed below the tornado photo where in the original there are only the silhouettes of trees.

Another photo that came my way last week was a collection of images under the title of “If This IS Earth, Then What is Heaven Like?” Most of the images were little more than good snapshots of famous landmarks and locations. The image that grabbed my eye immediately was a photo of a crescent-shaped island with a star-shaped island at the open edge of the crescent. It looked like the Turkish flag. As is happens I have been to that crescent-shaped island. It’s the Molokini Crater, a volcano crater rim half above the ocean surface, off the coast of Maui. There is no star-shaped island there. It’s a bogus photo. I found it again while looking for a link at the site linked above.

The last photographs I want to mention are actually real images of ice. There are some amazing photographs of great rounded bulks of beautiful blue-green ice formations emerging from icebergs in Antarctica. The phenomenon, as I understand it, occurs when the ice below the surface of the ocean melts to the point where the iceberg can no longer stay upright as a mountain or peak of ice. It then flips over, bringing the smoother blue-green ice to the surface. When these icebergs get caught amidst other icebergs and get refrozen and dusted with blowing snow the result is a mass of usual white cakes of drift ice and icebergs with these massive and stunning jewels of ice frozen in as part of the whole mass. The official explanation includes thawing and refreezing of water in the iceberg or the original glacier from which it calved. Melt water in glaciers may pool on the surface in beautiful blue or green pools and then later refreeze. However, the story that accompanied the photos was that it has been so cold in Antarctica these years (true, I have read that Antarctica has experienced colder than normal temperatures) that waves were frozen the moment they made contact with the air. Striped ice photos and an explanation are here.

This is ludicrous. First of all, if the water of the ocean froze the moment it made contact with the air then the entire surface would be frozen, not just the waves. Second, a wave wouldn’t freeze instantaneously throughout as first the outside water would freeze and then gradually the freezing would reach the inside of the wave. But as the freezing continued the ice would “float” to the top of the wave and the water in motion would continue moving forward. The result would be very different from the supposed frozen wave image the author of the story would have us believe.

There are some stories that fool me. But anyone with some knowledge of geography and nature, or at least employing some common sense, will be able to see the fakes. What I wonder is why people try to fool others like this? Is it because they can? They must be secretly smirking and snickering at the rest of us. I guess since I want to show the beauty of nature through my photography and tell about the amazing wonders of nature I want to know the truth and not some bogus story.

Now I am still trying to figure from the photos of Thai “girls” which ones are actually men. My guess is the most beautiful ones are the guys. Some are just so convincing...



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • winterslight said on Dec 16, 2008....
    cool pics.... but on the hole tornado sound i want to add something. i am not sure if it is cause i live on of a mtn. with hills all around. but when we got hit with the tornado in feb. it didnt sound like a train... it was close to my house less than a mile away. and we was hiding under mattress. but  it sounded like a rolling tunder does. but it went on forever. to me was like forever but i bet it wasnt.... so the train sound may not always be true :)  but  i love what you wrote and love that you debunked them....
  • nytquill17 said on Dec 16, 2008....
    I remember after that bad ice storm we had in the northeast US several years ago, where tons of people were without power for quite a long time in this day and age, there was a fake "satellite" photo going around that showed the U.S. at night, you could see all the points of light from populated areas and stuff, except that the NE was totally dark.  They were saying that the effect of the storm could be seen from space.  Of course the "blackout" had been photoshopped in.

    You would think people would recognize hoaxes more easily.  I guess you are looking at the issue of "a little knowledge is dangerous."  Most people don't actually know enough about the subjects involved to realize they're not true.  They know just enough that the "explanations" that are given seem to hold water.

    I think people do it for much the same reason that hackers make viruses.  To prove they can, to buck the system, to be rebellious, or specifically out of spite (but usually towards a group or organization rather than a specific person).  Or to prove a point.

    Did you hear the one about dihydrogen monoxide? ;)
  • fragglesrock said on Dec 16, 2008....
    first of all...how jealous i am that you have been to that island, even without the star. it does baffle me as to why people make crap like that up.  don't they have anything better to do than mess with my very naieve mind?
     
    the website "snopes" has become my best friend since i've spent too many years scared to alert an oncoming driver that their headlights are off and afraid to use payphones for fear they may be poisoned...lol
  • beyondtheveil said on Dec 16, 2008....
    hot- I've seen the first photo of lightning and the tornado without the refinery. That guy sure did a good job (to me) of falsifying the picture.

    I was next to one of the most devastating tornadoes in St. Louis history because the next day I could see the damage across the highway. All I heard was very high winds.
  • Hegemone said on Dec 16, 2008....
    Hot, that was really interesting.  I enjoyed looking at the photos and reading your contradictions to them.  I would never have known that.  Also, I've even seen the glaciers passed around before but never read 'em.  I admit, sometimes I'm lazy like that when I get emails and it says it's a forward ... I look at the pictures and delete it.  That said, when there are things that go around that I know to be false, well I just won't pass it and I'll even tell the person who sent it to me that it's not right.  If it's something I'm pretty sure isn't right, but I don't know 100%, but yet the photos look neat, I'll say something like 'These may not be real, but they're still neat to look at.'  Amazing how much wool gets pulled over our eyes in any given day isn't it?
  • Lucytorial said on Dec 16, 2008....
    Hmmm.. you know Hotcakes, as photography and film are a part of our business I know just what can be done with photos... its amazing how some people try it on.
     
    Frankly its rare these days to find a photo that isn't photoshopped.... not that there is anything wrong with photoshopping a photo but sometimes I cringe.... sometimes people are just pure dip shits.... they think that creating something bizaar will make them famous...
     
    You can also tell when a photo has been shopped to buggery, not just when its over the top not real.  Import to photoshop, you can go to the highest resolution and pick away the parts... most of the time the photo-shopper is terribly lazy and leaves the marks of a poor tradesman.
  • Lucytorial said on Dec 16, 2008....
    oooh almost forgot, I did a post of a photo hubby took the other night, yes its been shopped, but only to sharpen the depth of field and get rid of certain lighting problems...  check it out.
  • KathQuiet said on Dec 16, 2008....
    Um, you just figured this out?  Really, meant in true awed kindness.  The capability to produce bullshit has become ever so accessible.  You can Photoshop anything into being, create a false dateline and presto!  It's urban myth all over again.  Then there are the cheesy Christian charms with the bad clip art, amateurish effects and utterly annoying "God music" MIDI files looping over and over and over and over and over and....ooops, got caught in a loop!  Promising heavenly blessings and exclusive angel guardianship if you would only perpetuate the chain letter to all your very bestest 'net friends. 
     
    One question, please:  is this only a forte of Christian twits or do twits of other faiths also create and perpetuate this stuff?  I've never seen a Jewish chain-email, nor a Muslim one, nor voodoo or anything else.  What, do these Southern Baptist churches now have "How to Make Cutesy Christian Emails" instead of bible study?  I imagine all these women in stretch pants and dusters out there feeling the Love of Jesus flow through their fingertips, sure that they're saving the world through babies in hammocks and kitties quoting bad poetry. 
     
    Whoa. Sorry.  A wild tangent took me away.  Internet bullshit.  Yes.  Take nothing at face value and believe very little you read until you can confirm it through another source. 
  • hotaka said on Dec 16, 2008....
    winterslight, that's interesting about the tornado sound. I have read a few accounts and everyone says the same thing. I wonder if someone just said it first and others who read it or heard about it decided to use the same simile. I've always wanted to see a tornado but I can do with traveling somewhere to see one and not have one cruising past my house.

    nytquill17, yes, I saw that photo too. And I remember the storm. Not that I was part of it but it was all over the news in Canada as you can imagine and there was even a book published with some incredible photos. I assumed they were real.

    Yes, some of the explanations are very well dreamed up. And, yes, I saw the dihydrogen monoxide Web site. I stumbled across it once by accident. I was looking for a site from which to copy H20 in proper scientific notation and found that site. I read it and was laughing to myself. I posted a comment asking if this wasn't some university student's gag for a report. There was also the bonsai kittens if you ever saw that one.

    fraggles, all payphones are poisoned. And never alert an oncoming driver that his lights are off because he'll get really irrate and try to run you off the road.

    beyond, it was well done. Just I knew the original so I wasn't fooled. I imagine I would feel a certain guilt while being impressed with a tornado's power of destruction and at the same time thinking of all the trouble it caused the people whose stuff was damaged.

    Hegemone, yes, the photos often do look cool. But yeah, these days people are keen to stretch the photographic truth just to impress or confound. It's too bad the Internet can be so deceiving in its content. Oh well, freedom of speech; freedom of the press. Blah, blah.

    Gotta go. Be back later.
  • hotaka said on Dec 17, 2008....
    Lucytutourial, I once just missed capturing a spot of sunlight as it slipped off a mountain in the Andes. I was patiently waiting and watching the clouds to see if the light would return. A woman came up and snapped a shot of the dark peak under building clouds. I told her the light was good just a few minutes before and she replied, "That's what PhotoShop is for."

    Here's what I think about photo editing software: it's great for removing dust, touching up the colour a little if the image lacks the vibrancy you recall seeing, and cropping. It is also good for making ordinary photos extraordinary for advertising and for creating remarkable new images using various effects, and I accept and respect that as long as the new image is not passed off as what was really there (many advertising images I see have in fine print a disclaimer that the photograph is an "image"). I take representing nature as acuratly as possible in my photos seriously and try to capture mood and moment as best as I can. I see it as a bit of a sacriledge to create something new and then say that's what was real. At least the moon and star island was creative though it should be known that it is just someone's imagination.

    I'll check out your husband's photo.

    KathQuiet, yes, remarkably so, I just figured that out. Did you already know? ;) Of course I knew a long time ago but since I had received the third fake photo or fake story in as many weeks I felt I had to write something. I haven't been inspired to actually write when I sit down at the computer these days so i pounced on this one.

    Yes, the cutesy Christian emails do get tiresome and why do they always try to make you feel guilty for deleting them? God knows what you are going to do with this message, it said at the end of the last one I deleted. No, I have never seen a Jewish one, an Islamic one, a Buddhist one, a Sikh one or any other religion. It's just the Christians who are working to spread the word I guess, huh?

    For sure, you need two or three backup sources before you can believe anything on the Net.
  • nytquill17 said on Dec 17, 2008....
    Dihydrogen monoxide was actually used in someone's science fair project a few years back.  Some kid made a little announcement with all the information and then circulated a petition about getting it banned, to see how many people would fall for it.  The project was on gullibility, of course

    Just last year an Australian MP of all people got caught out by this hoax!
  • hotaka said on Dec 18, 2008....
    Very nice, nytquill. I read the article. I knew it had to be a student's hoax and probably a uni student's invention. Cool of the 14-year old to try to fool people at his science fair. Thanks for that.
  • Lucytorial said on Dec 18, 2008....
    Hotcakes I agree, a good photographer will not need to shop his work.  he should know how to use his camera.
     
    Sometimes we sit for hours waiting for light... isn't it funny? thats half the enjoyment for me.
  • KathQuiet said on Dec 20, 2008....
    Spreading the word...hope we can do better than that! Sometimes I get such a hoot out of the shopped photos (dogs with big teethy denture smiles) but do agree the best photos ever are the ones made great the old fashioned way - pure luck or patience and not an enhancement of any kind. Like some we've seen Lucy post....

Comment on "Bogus Photos and Stories"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously