bloc's tags:

"if you thought you were eating mostly grass-fed beef when you bit into a Big Mac, think again: The bulk of a fast-food hamburger from McDonald's, Burger King or Wendy's is made from cows that eat primarily corn, or so says a new study of the chemical composition of more than 480 fast-food burgers from across the nation.

And it isn't only cows that are eating corn. There is also evidence of a corn diet in chicken sandwiches, and even French fries get a good slathering of the fat that makes them so tasty from being fried in corn oil.

"Corn has been criticized as being unsustainable based on the unusual amount of fertilizer, water and machinery required to bring it to harvest," says geobiologist Hope Jahren of the University of Hawaii at Manoa's School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, who led the research. "We are getting a picture of the American diet on a national scale by using chemistry, which is quite objective.""

source



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • Lucytorial said on Nov 14, 2008....
    and your thoughts on this bloc are?
  • D6fer said on Nov 14, 2008....
    I love corn! I love corn fed beef! I love corn fed chicken too!.....think I'll go make some cornbread! ;p
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 14, 2008....
    D6 te he hehee actually corn fed is pretty good... any grain fed beef tastes awesome.
  • D6fer said on Nov 14, 2008....
    mmmmmmmmmmmmmm........I love a nice thick juicy steak!.....have you ever seasoned with coffee?
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 14, 2008....
    No thats quite interesting... I have though made a chocolate sauce with beef... yummmmmm
     
    I have a nice peice of three inch thick sirloin specially cut to my specifications, grain fed of which I will be cooking tonight.... ohh I'm hungry now.
  • D6fer said on Nov 14, 2008....
    3 inches? wow.....I guess size really does matter to women! ;p
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 14, 2008....
    well I am a meat eater D6, no use beating round the bush with a pissy little thin limp number.
  • bloc said on Nov 14, 2008....
    @lucy
    our meat production practices are terribly inefficient, bad for the environment, and helping to prevent us from becoming energy independent. 
  • D6fer said on Nov 14, 2008....
    bloc....I know a few corn farmers myself and they use cow shit for fertilizer.....I am sure that is not what everyone is doing but whatever.....if farms are contaminating our ground water, rivers, etc, then it should be addressed......but don't expect everyone to become vegetarians....it will never happen.
  • travelr712 said on Nov 15, 2008....
    i don't eat fast food very often anyway, and most of my diet consists of chicken and sea food. do they feed corn to shrimp now too?
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 15, 2008....
    Shrimp? Plastic waste and crude oil I think is the current dietary additive for shrimp.
  • D6fer said on Nov 15, 2008....
    don't forget antibiotics! mmmmmmmmmmm.....shrimmmmp
  • kelly said on Nov 15, 2008....
    "but don't expect everyone to become vegetarians....it will never happen."

    You might be surprised.  With the growing water shortage, using thousands of gallons of it to produce just one pound of beef will start to become prohibitively expensive.  Not to mention that producing animal protein requires 8 times more fossil fuels than plant protein, and we all know what's happening with fossil fuels.

    The future is looking very vegetarian indeed.

    article
  • travelr712 said on Nov 15, 2008....
    so, how do y'all feel about turkey?
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 15, 2008....
    Kelly: "U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat." Amazing.

    With the price of meat and seafood out-pacing other forms of protein its no wonder. Seafood is also becoming scarce from all the industrial harvesting (see Expanding Marine Protected Areas To Restore Fisheries). Cape Cod has no Cod. And catfish, which was considered unpalatable when I was young, is now "the leading aquacultural product" here.

    In the United States, catfish, which require only 1.6 kilograms of feed to gain 1 kilogram of live weight is the leading aquacultural product. With U.S. catfish production last year at roughly 600 million pounds (270,000 tons), or more than 2 pounds for each American, U.S. consumption of catfish exceeded that of lamb and mutton. U.S. catfish production is concentrated in four states: Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and Arkansas. Mississippi, with some 174 square miles (45,000 hectares) of catfish ponds and easily 60 percent of U.S. output, is the catfish capital of the world.
  • travelr712 said on Nov 15, 2008....
    soilent green is PEOPLE!!!!!
  • kelly said on Nov 15, 2008....
    "so, how do y'all feel about turkey?"

    I feel they'll be better off when they admit the genocide of the Armenians.
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 15, 2008....

    Bloc ~ Cattle production in America is behind the times, especially when you consider the breed types used for the areas of cattle production.

     

    Here in Oz, breeds are reared in particular areas, Brahman are suited to hotter climates and a harsher environment, QLD mostly rear brahman cattle due to the fact they can withstand the heat, lack of abundant food for half the year and are well suited to scrubby conditions.  If you put a braham in a sensative environment you will undoubtadly provide a situation where the environment is being adversly effected.


    Cattle producers have a minimum standard practice they have to adhere to, their lisences are removed if they do not comply.

    The feed enhancement practices in australia start from the weener cattle all the way through to the 30 day process before kulling, using sustainable methods of farming.  In other words, your land is suitable to rear cattle, your land is suitable to grow crops, over farming and lack of environmental management leaves a less than desireable outcome on many other countries beef industries because they are not followed up on.  No one is making sure that the entrie industry itself is sustainable, which starts from the environment right through to the slaughter house.

    Our government does get it right sometimes and its primary industries are doing it mostly right, with a good kick up the butt then farming practices australia wide may actually move into other countries.

    I'd prefer to have a go at the wheat industry to be honest, wheat and rice which destroys more land per yeild acreage than any beef industry, uses more unsustainable water than any beef industry farmer will ever use, uses more pesticides than any beef industry will ever use in a lifetime of farming for one years crop yeild... I could go on but I'm afraid I'll bore everyone.

  • Lucytorial said on Nov 15, 2008....
    The whole idea of using corn btw is so that the animals themselves eat less vegetation.  The idea sucks considering if they actually fed their animals their natural diet they'd not only be reducing green house gasses (cow farts) which is shown to be a huge toxic bomb for the environment, cows don't fart as much when on their natural diet, that to which they were born to eat, same goes for chooks... all other animals that are seed and grass grazers.
    As for fish, well, lets start whith bad farming practices..... studies have shown that not only deep sea fish but also hump back whales contain rediculous amounts of lead and other chemicals from run offs from bad farming practices...
     
    Way I see it, primary industries world wide need stricter controls and measures, including lisencing and minimum practices.   Here I go again with the socialism... bwa ha ha  ohhh thats right didn't bush just say that tighter controls wouldn't help???
     
     
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 15, 2008....
    Actually...

    Traditionally, all beef was grass-fed beef, but in the United States today what is commercially available is almost all feedlot beef. The reason? It's faster, and so more profitable. Seventy-five years ago, steers were 4 or 5 years old at slaughter. Today, they are 14 or 16 months. You can't take a beef calf from a birth weight of 80 pounds to 1,200 pounds in a little more than a year on grass. It takes enormous quantities of corn, protein supplements, antibiotics and other drugs, including growth hormones.

    Switching a cow from grass to grain is so disturbing to the animal's digestive system that it can kill the animal if not done gradually and if the animal is not continually fed antibiotics. These animals are designed to forage, but we make them eat grain, primarily corn, in order to make them as fat as possible as fast as possible.
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 15, 2008....
    Thats why its introduced from weaners onwards.  Feeding lots were also introduced not just to help the animals gain weight.. well not here anyway it was introduced to help with soil management, giving the grazier a chance to get condition in his soil back again, allowing a rotating type system to help water run off and degredation.
     
    The age of slaughter house steers Shetler depends on when they are sold to market, not ALL steers are 16 months old, there are different pricing schedules for different ages of cattle sold, each depending on their age, their weight and also their condition.  Some graziers will not sell off their steers because they know their condition will improve with time, this is also true when talking of lactic acid build up in beef that are bought to slaughter too early, thats why it isn't as widely practiced as you maintain... maybe in America but then again as I have stated above the primary industries in the US leave a lot to be desired.
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 15, 2008....
    I'm sure there are technical details that are not apparent to the public to which you refer.

    When I lived in Arizona there was an industrial operation for beef right down the road.

    The cattle literally lived in their the own shit from birth to death. The feed is heavily doctored to prevent infection, as well as accelerate the cattle weight gain. Those chemicals, along with the pathogens they suppress, make it into food supply.

    The cattle that die from disease are not disposed of, they are sold to pig and poultry operations as renderings and fed to their animals. The diseased pig and poultry are in turn are sold to the beef operations and fed to the cattle. The chemicals and pathogens never leave the food chain of the animals involved.

    The industrial beef, poultry and pig operations supplied the industrial farms all about with fertilizer supplement that contained these chemicals and pathogens. Thus the chemicals and pathogens never actually leave the food chain till you and I consume them.

    later.
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 15, 2008....

    Shetler then why is it people are so damned against monitoring, and best practices? I simply can't fathom it, at least here there is a decent amount of intelligence for farming practices that provide longevity as well as economic sustainability for the industries involved.

    Frankly what you have just said is disgusting and I am extremely glad we don't import US beef, and thankful that my country has at least the morals and ethics to regulate such a hugely potent industry.

    Why cut of the hand that feeds you by continueing farming practices that have no value, financial, health or environment?

     

    Nice chatting see you later.

  • sheltercrow said on Nov 16, 2008....
    EARTHLINGS - Part 2 - Food (watch if you dare)

  • bloc said on Nov 16, 2008....
    @d6
    We've had this conversation often and you keep assuming something I've specifically denied to you many times. I don't expect everyone to become vegetarian. This is not a binary black and white issue where you either eat a lot of meat or are a vegetarian. What I hope to do is influence people to eat a lot less meat. It is both good for them, good for our society, and good for the environment. The leading cause of death in america is heart disease which is caused by meat consumption. The leading cause of deforestation is cattle production, and meat production as practiced in america requires a lot of fossil fuels.
  • D6fer said on Nov 16, 2008....
    I don't know bloc.....I think that over eating of everything is more of a problem than the meat portion.....look at the fast food industry...seducing us into super sizing everything....they don't give you more meat...just fries and sugar laden soft drinks.

    as the rest of the world becomes more modernized, meat is readily available to them and storage is no longer a problem.....it seems logical that meat production would increase. 
  • Lucytorial said on Nov 16, 2008....
    I gotta agree with D6 here Bloc, the major cause of heart disease in the US is not only due to over eating, its also zero exercise and a lack of understanding how to eat food groups.
     
    Mostly its lazy assed americans indulging day after day on super sized this or that, its not the meat... its the how much, and how its cooked and what it comes with.
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 17, 2008....
    Of the Fattest Countries in the World the United States ranks 9th. [Source: World Health Organization.]

    Obesity (most recent) by country is led by the United States. Australia is ranked as 6th. SOURCE: OECD Health Data 2005

    'lazy assed' is not addressed.

    Statistics by Country for Heart disease

    United States: 23,751,538 out of 293,655,405 [8.1%]
    Australia: 1,610,621 out of 19,913,1442 [8.1%]

  • sheltercrow said on Nov 17, 2008....
    Oops... Australia: 1,610,621 out of 19,913,144 [8.1%]
  • andora said on Nov 18, 2008....
    this conversation is very interesting

    vegetarianism will become the diet of the future as the meat industry continues to be financially unprofitable, as disease is passed around the world with tainted products raised in tainted conditions. The US has gone way over board on this as the forests of the America's, from Canada to Chile get razed to raise more beef.

    People everywhere are living in the feces of sick animals and our children are taking on body-types that are very bovine indeed. Thank god they are practicing genocide by choice...in other words, these types of people are killing themselves en-mass. I don't have to oppose this type of stupidity...all i have to do is stand back and watch stupidity kill itself!.

    Obese people that look like cows wear their stupidity on their bones for all to see

    sucks to be the living dead
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 18, 2008....
    "wear their stupidity on their bones for all to see"

    Lol. Be nice now. "there are other factors that also play a role in obesity."

    What Causes Obesity?

    Obesity occurs when a person consumes more calories than he or she burns. For many people this boils down to eating too much and exercising too little.
    But there are other factors that also play a role in obesity. These may
    include:

    • Age. As you get older, your body's ability to metabolize food slows down and you do not require as many calories to maintain your weight. This is why people note that they eat the same and do the same activities as they did when they were 20 years old, but at age 40, gain weight.
    • Gender. Women tend to be more overweight than men. Men have a higher resting metabolic rate (meaning they burn more energy at rest) than women, so men require more calories to maintain their body weight. Additionally, when women become postmenopausal, their metabolic rate decreases. That is partly why many women gain weight after menopause.
    • Genetics. Obesity (and thinness) tends to run in families. In a study of adults who were adopted as children, researchers found that participating adult weights were closer to their biological parents' weights than their adoptive parents'. The environment provided by the adoptive family
      apparently had less influence on the development of obesity than the person's genetic makeup. In fact, if your biological mother is heavy as an adult, there is approximately a 75% chance that you will be heavy. If your biological mother is thin, there is also a 75% chance that you will be thin. Nevertheless, people who feel that their genes have doomed them to a lifetime of obesity should take heart. Many people genetically predisposed to obesity do not become obese or are able to lose weight and keep it off.
    • Environmental factors. Although genes are an important factor in many cases of obesity, a person's environment also plays a significant role. Environmental factors include lifestyle behaviors such as what a person eats and how active he or she is.
    • Physical activity. Active individuals require more calories than less active ones to maintain their weight. Additionally, physical activity tends to decrease appetite in obese individuals while increasing the body's ability to preferentially metabolize fat as an energy source. Much of the increase in obesity in the last 20 years is thought to have resulted from the decreased level of daily physical activity.
    • Psychological factors. Psychological factors also influence eating habits and obesity. Many people eat in response to negative emotions such as boredom, sadness, or anger. While most overweight people have no more psychological disturbances than people at their normal weight, about 30% of people who seek treatment for serious weight problems have difficulties with binge eating. During a binge-eating episode, people eat large amounts of food while feeling they can't control how much they are eating.
    • Illness. Although not as common as many believe, there are some illnesses that can cause obesity. These include hormone problems such as hypothyroidism (poorly acting thyroid slows metabolism), depression, and some rare diseases of the brain that can lead to overeating.
    • Medication. Certain drugs, such as steroids and some antidepressants, may cause excessive weight gain.
  • bloc said on Nov 18, 2008....
    @lucy

    There are a lot of studies that show that people who have the same level of activity have different levels of heart disease based on the amount of animal products they eat. Those that eat animal products, and get the same amount of exercise, have much higher levels of heart disease. One of the many studies that come to this conclusion is The China Study.

    "I think that over eating of everything is more of a problem than the meat portion.....look at the fast food industry...seducing us into super sizing everything....they don't give you more meat...just fries and sugar laden soft drinks."

    This depends on what we mean by "problem". If we're talking about health then eating too many processed foods is a bigger problem than eating meat. The fast food you mention is a great example and ties directly into my point about corn. That "sugar" laden soft drink is not laden with sugar, it's laden with high fructose corn syrup. The biggest health problem in America is the overconsumption of highly processed foods.

    The point about super sizing is great too. That is capitalism at it's finest ;) Humans can only eat so much food so how would a good capitalist increase profits if they produce food? Charge more for the food or convince you to eat more food. Fast food chains usually do the later with things like super sizing.

    If however we are talking about the environment then eating meat is the bigger problem due to the inefficiency of producing it.

    @everyone
    having said all that, if we start with the assumption that our diet isn't terrible (which isn't true for most americans) then a diet low in meat, and high in unprocessed vegetables, is far healthier and much better for the environment.

  • bloc said on Nov 18, 2008....
    regarding mcdonalds fries.

    "The taste of McDonald's french fries played a crucial role in the chain's success -- fries are much more profitable than hamburgers -- and was long praised by customers, competitors, and even food critics. James Beard loved McDonald's fries. Their distinctive taste does not stem from the kind of potatoes that McDonald's buys, the technology that processes them, or the restaurant equipment that fries them: other chains use Russet Burbanks, buy their french fries from the same large processing companies, and have similar fryers in their restaurant kitchens. The taste of a french fry is largely determined by the cooking oil. For decades McDonald's cooked its french fries in a mixture of about seven percent cottonseed oil and 93 percent beef tallow. The mixture gave the fries their unique flavor -- and more saturated beef fat per ounce than a McDonald's hamburger."

    They switched this in 1990. From the same article

    "About 90 percent of the money that Americans now spend on food goes to buy processed food"

    The entire article is a good read


  • D6fer said on Nov 19, 2008....
    bloc.....I used to have a cafe.....people loved my cooking....I used lard!
    I even deep fried in it!     I remember an old couple from out of town stopped in for lunch and had burgers and fries....the old lady said the fries were so good and "not greasy like other places"......so the beef tallow thing doesn't surprise me.
    I heard once that there is an amino acid in meat that humans crave.
  • D6fer said on Nov 19, 2008....
    bloc....I also believe that our eating habits due largely in part to the overall wealth of our country would be the biggest factor in the health comparisons with the rest of the world that you tend to use in your arguments for UHC.
  • bloc said on Nov 19, 2008....
    wow, the font in my last post came out too big. That's what I get for using safari instead of firefox :/

    My wife sure seems to crave meat while I haven't had any cravings for it since the day I stopped eating it (about 10 years ago).
  • D6fer said on Nov 19, 2008....
    lol.....I have to ask.....do you two ever argue about meat?
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 20, 2008....
    As concerning what we eat...

    Fluoride in Drinking Water may Negatively Affect Health of Fetuses and Infants


    Toxic waste chemicals are disposed of by feeding to humans, then calling it fluoride

    And in case you're wondering how this mass manipulation is accomplished...

    The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers? thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior. Most accepted articles contribute to or extend theory in psychology and consumer research by empirical research (often from lab or field experiments, though survey and other methodological paradigms are welcomed as well).Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the underpinnings of consumer behavior and decision processes are also encouraged.
  • sheltercrow said on Nov 20, 2008....
    And another site devoted to Media and Communications Studies has quite a database.

    From Mir Internet Marketing we have these stories.

    Preschoolers Say McDonald's Carrots Taste Best - August 7, 2007
    The marketing of obesity-friendly foods may have the strongest effect on preschool aged children, shows a study from the August issue of Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Researchers asked 63 children between the ages of three and five to... Continue reading "Preschoolers Say McDonald's Carrots Taste Best"

    Sad People Willing to Spend More Money - April 10, 2008
    Feeling glum drives spending for a specific type of individual, shows research by social psychologists at Harvard and Carnegie Mellon Universities. For their study, "Misery is not Miserly: Sad and Self-Focused Individuals Spend More," 33 test subjects were randomly assigned... Continue reading "Sad People Willing to Spend More Money"

    Shopping Patterns Can Predict Normal, Psychotic Personalities - December 10, 2007
    Taking a look at holiday shopping patterns may help identify personality disorders, says Paul Albanese, Assistant Professor of Marketing at Kent State University. Albanese has classified personality types into four categories: normal, neurotic, primitive and psychotic. Accordingly, normal personalities follow... Continue reading "Shopping Patterns Can Predict Normal, Psychotic Personalities"
  • bloc said on Nov 20, 2008....
    @d6
    not really. Sometimes she feels like I bug her too much about it.
  • stopmediabias said on Nov 22, 2008....

    Great topic and an interesting debate.  I think everything is better when there is a moderation with everything.  I little meat, fish, chicken, veggys, starches, etc.. 

    People are obese and dropping dead of heartattacks not because they eat certain things that are bad for them, its because they are negligent in their lifestyle in knowing what is good and bad for them. 

    My daughter was a vegetarian for many years and I supported her.  She was because she believed it would help her be healthier, not because she thought it was murder to kill animals.  I stopped eating meat many years ago because of the mad cow disease scare, but it didn't last long.

    Eating healthy meat is good for you, eating veggies is good for you, eating just and only one or the other is bad for you.  Eating processed food is not bad for you but eating processed food five times a day every day is.  We also seem to forget why food is processed.

    If people believe eating cows is murder they would be surprised to find out the processing of what it takes support a vegan diet kills way more animals than processing a meat diet.  The machinery, the pesticides, the use of land, etc...

    I think we need more education that teaches exercise, moderation, and proper eating habits.

  • kelly said on Nov 22, 2008....
    "We also seem to forget why food is processed."

    Food is heavily processed to make it more profitable.
  • bloc said on Nov 22, 2008....
    "People are obese and dropping dead of heartattacks not because they eat certain things that are bad for them, its because they are negligent in their lifestyle in knowing what is good and bad for them. "

    Aren't these the same thing?

    "Eating healthy meat is good for you, eating veggies is good for you, eating just and only one or the other is bad for you. "

    Scientific evidence suggests otherwise. People that eat the least meat have the least amounts of heart attacks, cancer, diabetes, etc.

    "If people believe eating cows is murder they would be surprised to find out the processing of what it takes support a vegan diet kills way more animals than processing a meat diet"

    This statement is absurd. Back it up with some facts.


  • sheltercrow said on Nov 22, 2008....
    The ugly reality is that with most meat recalls the meat has already been consumed and cannot be recalled. It is the nature of the USDA to be reactive and too late.

    USDA orders recall of 143 million pounds of beef

    The recall dates back to February 1, 2006, and Raymond said "the great majority" of the meat has probably been eaten already. USDA officials have begun tracing the products covered by the recall, he said.

    "A lot of this is fresh, raw product and with ground beef, etcetera, that has a very short shelf life and refrigerator life," he said.

    Most of the beef was sent to distribution centers in bulk packages. The USDA said it will work with distributors to determine how much meat remains, the AP reports.

    In a related story...

    A new report from the Government Accountability Office gives federal food regulators failing marks when it comes to preventing false and misleading labeling.

    The GAO report found that while the number of food firms and products has increased dramatically, the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight and enforcement efforts “have not kept pace.” The FDA is supposed to conduct label reviews when it inspects foreign food firms, but in 2007 only inspected 95 firms overseas (there are tens of thousands) and in only 11 countries (out of 150 that export food to the U.S.)
  • stopmediabias said on Nov 23, 2008....

    Bloc-When asked if eating bad foods and a negligent lifestyle are the same thing, not in this context.  I look at blaming fast food for obesity as the same as blaming cars for the actions of reckless drivers.  Granted there is a case to be made for advertising that is deceptive but still there has to be some personal accountability factored in.

    In regards to veggies versus meats, I would agree with you that a diet higher in veggies versus meat is better for you but like I said in moderation.  There are different variables that affect different people.  Here is a quote from a couple of people who have written extensively on this subject.

    "Are these anomalous findings? On the contrary. Consider, for example, the American Cancer Society’s 2001 study of diet and stomach cancer, which looked at 436,000 men and women, and found no increased risk of stomach cancer associated with eating processed meats. What that study did find, by contrast, was an increased risk of stomach cancer in women who consumed more vegetables!"

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDM3MTg2MmQyOGJmODU0MGFjZTc3Nzk4Zjg3M2ZiNmU=&w=MQ==

    On the other point:  SL Davis of the Dept. of Animal Sciences at Oregon State University wrote of the moral status of animals.  He concludes that processing a vegan diet kills more animals.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/972951/posts

    Kelly-You are correct, but food is also processed to protect us in that it spoils in a lot less time.  We scoff at processed food, but imagine the worst types of poverty in the world could be solved if these people learned how to process food, especially canned food. 


     

     

     

  • bloc said on Nov 23, 2008....
    that NRO article was terribly inaccurate.

    " to protect us in that it spoils in a lot less time."

    this is true, but it spoils slower because the things that are good for us are removed. Of course, the term processing is an odd term. I wouldn't consider things like canned beans to be "processed".

Comment on "corn and more corn"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

I laugh because I just farted....
raw chocolatexocai chocolatedark chocolate cocoaorganic dark chocolatedark chocolate healthdark chocolate benefitsdark chocolate brown...
How can you possibly lose weight without dieting? The answer to that isn't nearly as difficult as it seems. You just need to decide to choose a healthy way to lose weight by changing your lifestyle and relationship to food. Stop cravings and stop ove...
I am dying to eat some pizza or brownies right now.  It really feels like if I don't get it NOW I might pass out.  O.K. blogging about it is not making me feel better.  I can't eat brownies 'cause I don't have any, but that pizza is right there in the fr...
Everything from FREE soda and pie to Black Friday ads, deals, and steals! Also, info on free shipping, great coupons, and lots of FREE items!!...