I am developing an engine that burns cow manure. Now that the Democrats have taken control, there will be no shortage of that.
Let's say that Bob extracts oil from the ground. Tim buys oil from bob. Joe buys futures in oil. If Bob extracts and sells the same amount of oil to time how in the world would Joe's purchase of futures affect the price?
Because futures is all about telling the future and selling accordingly. You buy up gas now at what you assume it will be worth later factoring in that China is exploding and will want more gas (and they would have too if they hadn't lowered how much they subsidized oil in their nation). The way I understand it part of the equation is the assumption that Bob (and everybody else) will produce the same amount of oil, no more and no less (or atleast that any change will be easily observed and accounted for.)
I think it's faulty thinking that proof of the futures is the way it seems tied to the stock market though. I think it ignores the fact that literally the week that Bush removed the federal ban on off shore drilling that oil started dropping. That it paused for a bit near 100 dollars, then when Congress let the ban expire it continued it's downward spiral. Reason being that futures by definition aren't really all that concerned about how hard it is to get gas right now, but rather how hard it should be to get oil ten years from now.
Peak Oil is obviously a fact. What isn't a fact is how long it takes oil to form in the ground, how much is actually there and if (like whale oil) we'll find an alternative soon enough.