somethingunUSual's tags:
Who's reading somethingunUSual (14):
 
 
Let's get back to that 3:00 A.M. phone call....it's the Cuban Missile Crisis. The enemy is pushing us to the brink of World War. Our kids are going to die. The wrong move will obliterate more than half the people on the planet.
 
The Joint Chiefs are all ready to exercise their powers and have their strategies in place. They know how to conduct the last war. They're itching for the opportunity to prove themselves.
 
They're telling President Obama what they want him to hear. They're pressuring him to okay this and approve of that, and everything he knows about military strategy and warfare can be found on the shelves of your local library.
 
Sadly, President Obama only has Michelle who knows him well. Vice President Biden has his own ideas and is more eager to implement those than to give the President all of his options. There is no Bobby Kennedy to keep Barack on track.
 
Under mounting pressure, the former junior senator from Illinois and crack community organizer gives in to one of his Generals and launches a first strike to destroy the missiles.
 
Sadly, many Russian soldiers die in the process.
 
As the follow-up, we invade Cuba to secure the island once and for all. And although the very intelligent graduate of Harvard Law has surrounded himself with wise folk of all sort, none have persuaded him that Russia's retaliation will not be in Cuba - but in Turkey, where an immediate counter-strike is launched.
 
I could go on, but the short version is BOOM. BOOM. BOOM. And blackout.
 
Is Senator Obama the person that you want handling the next Cuban Missile Crisis? Or would it be better stewarded by the fellow who's seen war from every side and who knows full well the capabilities and limitations of our military power - in a way far more than merely intellectual?
 
I've got no choice in this election. Without national security, there is no economy, no domestic welfare, no pursuit of happiness. Only BOOM, And blackout.
 
Please vote for McCain.  I thank you.
 


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • kruuyai said on Oct 18, 2008....
    Oh, you mean like GW and all his vast military experience?  Let's see now, sor what percentage of his cushy non-combatant military career in the National Guard was he AWOL? 
  • somethingunUSual said on Oct 18, 2008....
    Exactly. Had enough of amateurs? I'm glad you get it.
     Support McCain.
  • TheUndergroundEagle said on Oct 18, 2008....
    And without a sound economy there's no strong military. McCain, of course, will be relying on the budgeting expertise of housewife and supermother Sarah Palin.
     
    Support Obama.
  • husbandhater said on Oct 18, 2008....
    I'm with Kru. Your right no MORE Amateurs like George Bush. We don't need McCain to finish off this country. If the rich get anymore breaks to go spend their money overseas then we will never get out of this current economical fiasco. Maybe 8yrs wasn't enough for some and they want to help finish off the country in what will now be 12yrs of Republican bull.
     
    And when your all sitting onthe soup kitchen line making the comparrisons of the Bush McCain presidencys. I wonder if your going to admit your mistakes then.
  • NobodySpecial said on Oct 18, 2008....
    Judging from the personalities of the candidates personalities, I'd guess that McCain would be the first to do something like that. After all, he can barely keep his demeanor after the petty argument the debates turned into. Or maybe he would have nuked them. Coming up with 'scenarios' doesn't prove a point at all.
     
    As for there being no choice in this election, vote Nader, vote a third party who doesn't lower themselves to the norm of the dems or reps.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 19, 2008....
    Two crashes, and "daredevil clowning"

    McCain's lie...

    McCain, 1999 (pp155-156): I crashed a plane in Corpus Christi Bay one Saturday morning. The engine quit while I was practicing landings. ... I barely managed to get the canopy open and swim to the surface. ... I took a few painkillers and hit the sack to rest my aching back for a few hours. ... I was out carousing, injured back and all, later that evening.

    According to a Naval Aviation Safety Center report, obtained by the Los Angeles Times, investigators determined that the engine did not quit, and McCain was to blame:

    Los Angeles Times, Oct. 6, 2008: Cockpit instruments that froze on impact showed the engine was still producing power. When water quenched the exhaust stack, it preserved a bright blue color, showing that the engine was still hot. And an aviator behind McCain reported that the engine was producing the black smoke characteristic of Skyraiders.

    Investigators determined that McCain was watching instruments in his cockpit that indicated the position of his landing gear and had lost track of his altitude and speed.

    The report concluded: "In the opinion of the board, the pilot's preoccupation in the cockpit . . . coupled with the use of a power setting too low to maintain level flight in a turn were the primary causes of this accident."

    You would like this clown as president?
  • kelly said on Oct 19, 2008....
    SU is using classic fear tactics.  I could just as easily make up a scenario out of whole cloth, just like he did, that supports voting for Obama.  Just ignore it.
  • RollingC said on Oct 19, 2008....

    Nobody really knows what the future is going to bring.   Intelligent guesses can be made but in the end no one knows for sure.

  • ALIENated said on Oct 19, 2008....
    
    Yes, ignore all the logic that is thrown toward you. McCain is obviously the
    better choice, but ignore that. He is from the same party as Bush, nothing
    like him, but from the same party. He voted with Bush much of the time, 
    but so would everyone else if they were not playing I that Bush political 
    games along with the liberal media. And McCain knows too much because 
    he is over 50, but ignore that. Ignore that McCain was a prisioner of war,
    serving his country, when Obama was a child and Obama's cohort, William
    Ayers, was blowing up stuff on U.S. soil. Ignore all the bad decisions Obama
    has made over the years about the people he associates with. Is is stupid
    to think he will keep making those bad decisions if he is president (why?).
    Ignore everything about McCain because he is white and we MUST elect a
    black man. We must atone for our guilt about what our great great great
    grandfathers and grandmother may have taken part in. And we must give
    Hollywood new things to make movies about. We must elect a black man, 
    which is fine in and of itself, but it does not qualify Obama to be president. 
    We may as well elect Mickey Mouse instead of just registering his vote for
    Obama.
    
    This is kind of off topic, but I wonder if all those dead people, second
    graders, and cartoon characters that ACORN has registered are counted
    in the polls.
    
    
  • dyingman said on Oct 19, 2008....
    The Cuban Missile Crisis was headed off by THINKING.

    Kennedy responded to the demand for removal of Jupiter missiles from Turkey by ignoring it and responding to the first agreement for withdrawal of Soviet advisers and supplies.  No force needed.

    Does THIS sound more like Obama who would sit down and talk with Soviets without pre-conditions or more like McCain who'd give them the silent treatment and invade with a SURGE?

    Given McCain's support for all things military, I'm NOT impressed with your argument.  an you pick a more appropriate analogy?  I'm not feeling this one at all.

    On the other hand, by the time we survive four more years of tax cuts for corporations and millionaires and investment firms, we won't be able to AFFORD to invade anywhere else, so maybe you have a point.

    *DM






  • ALIENated said on Oct 19, 2008....
    
    I am not sure what country you live in, but my taxes went down the last
    several years, under the Bush tax cuts, and we make under $100 K per
    year. That cuts for big business only crap is just crap. My taxes were 
    much higher under Clinton and under Carter. I was laid off several time 
    during the Clinton years only once in that last eight years. I sat in 
    gasoline lines during the Carter years. I could at least get gasoline 
    during our current high priced gasoline deal, which was probably just a
    ploy to make Bush look bad by our enemies who feel more comfortable
    with Obama, as you said. I prefer someone who will defend our country,
    if necessary, instead of someone who will give it away because they
    do not know what the f**k they are doing.
    
    
  • husbandhater said on Oct 19, 2008....
    AL look around you our way of doing things is dying. And it just took Bush for us to all realize that this occuring. For all of the technology and advancements we have made we have failed to change the way we do business and we have failed to have government represent the face of the world. I beleive this is our chance to break the mold. To go outside of the box so to speak. Maybe it is time that we get off our keisters and stop looking for some great white hope and rescue our country ourselves. We can do that with great leadership.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 19, 2008....
    
    Yes, this is our chance to switch to socialism. No thank you. Blaming our
    current situation on Bush is assinine. Bush has been president while a lot
    of crap happened that would have happened no matter who was president.
    It is a matter of how you handle it. But that does not matter anyway. Even
    if Bush is a bad president (which I do not think), that does not change the
    reality of Obama being a bad choice. Electing Obama will not punish Bush,
    it will punish America. Have you ever answered my question? Is Obama's
    color the number one reason you are voting for him? Be as honest as you
    possibly can. God is watching. And not just you. Everyone needs to
    answer that question. Can you truly say Obama is qualified to be president
    more than McCain, who is definitely qualified based on experience and
    know how. Blacks are simply playing into the hands of elitist white liberals
    who are using them, as usual, to further their march toward socialism, 
    unrestricted abortion (I said UNRESTRICTED, like killing infants), gay 
    marriage, dismantling our military, and on and on and on. Fool youself if you
    like, but you are the only one being fooled. somethingunUSual is right to 
    question Obama's ability to make those late night decisions. After all, Biden
    was questioning that only a couple of months ago. Our future could hang 
    in the balance, and Obama will have to spend precious time wondering 
    which special interest group (ACORN, the UAW, the postal workers, the 
    teachers unions, etc.) he will offend by making this decision or that. Just 
    the unbridled bias that the media and Hollywood is now showing Obama 
    should be enough to tell you something is rotten in all this. They already 
    tell what to wear, what to eat, what to think, what to watch, and now 
    they want to tell us who to vote for. Never think for a minute that this is 
    not about directing the future of this nation. They want perversion to be 
    legal (sex with minors is next, you watch), murdering unwanted babies to 
    be legal (like the communists in China), and that is just for starters. It
    is like when Obama was at that Hollywood party, voicing his true opinions
    about the real people of this country, the ones who live between our two
    left coasts. They are stupid and need to be told how to do everything, and
    our black citizens are helping them along, thinking they are electing a black
    man (who is not even a black man) when in fact they are electing a dyed
    in the wool 1960s style liberal / socialist who wants to "redistribute" the
    wealth. You think he means the wealth of the wealthy, but think again, read
    your history book (if you can find one that Big Brother has not already edited
    to fit the socialist message). And Obama is not even afraid to tell you what
    he wants to do. He does not even try to hide it like Carter and Clinton did 
    because people are now blinded by color instead of being indifferent to it. 
    Tell me I am wrong when almost 100 percent of blacks say they are voting 
    for Obama, even blacks that claim to be Republican. Tell me I am wrong and
    say goodbye to America as we know it, and say hello to the USSA, the
    United Socialist States of America. I hope it is worth it to you to have a
    blackish president.
    
    
  • husbandhater said on Oct 19, 2008....
    I see you going on and on about abortion but are you willing to open your home up to an unwanted child(as our society is full of them and of many races of them)? I applaud any person who knows their limits and is brave enough to admit it. We as a society don't have to LIKE IT. But I as a woman and a mother understand it. What any woman does with her body is between her and God after all your certainly not going to fry in hell for the woman that has aborted her child as you have your own sins to answer for as do I.

    And as far as Black Republicans voting for O. You haven't been watching much CNN lately have you? I saw one at a baptist church that said he was voting McCain and CNN did an expo on a man who on public radio that he is voting for McCain and he's sent hate mail and has loss listeners for his O bashing. Like I said in another post. You aren't meeting the right people are you are gettin what you want from the conversation.

    Oh and that blackish President was raised by a White family. So whose needs will he be more intune to? You insult him by calling him blackish. He is B.I.R.A.C.I.A.L! I know alot who don't like the term but they have every right to claim both heritages They are not 1/2 of a person it takes 2people to make a child so it is whatever the 2people are made up of that makes that one person. This has been an ugly blight in the history of this country and you think in the 21st century many would get with the program.

  • redryder said on Oct 19, 2008....

    I was going to vote for McCain until he revealed himself to be a petty, hot-headed, low dealing  politican.  I am stunned by his behavior in this campaign, anyone with a bad temper has no business being commander-in-chief.  I doubt if I will vote because I am fed up with both parties.  They are too partisan and corrupt beyond belief.  I am turning the country over to the younger generation.  Read my "Passing the Banner" post if it suits your fancy. 

  • Emanon said on Oct 19, 2008....

      Do you honestly believe Any of these guys are actually calling the shots? .......

    -just do a little digging on their past and connections-



    P.S.  Even if they could or wanted, they won't serve the People...
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 19, 2008....
    Some things never change...

    AP IMPACT: Mortgage firm arranged stealth campaign

    By PETE YOST

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance giant and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

    In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

    [...]
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 19, 2008....
    Alien: You are turning into the worst kind of wing-nut. An Astroturfing wing-nut.
  • kelly said on Oct 19, 2008....
    "I was laid off several time
    during the Clinton years only once in that last eight years."

    If you couldn't stay employed during the Clinton years then you MUST have been doing something wrong.  Those were generally prosperous times.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 19, 2008....
    
    Dog: takes one to know one.
    
    kelly: Ya think. Honestly, I do not blame Clinton or Bush for my situation. It was
    just what it was. Jobs come and go no matter who is president. My best years
    were during the Reagan years. I actually got bonuses and raises. There have
    been times this country was supposedly in a recession and I did not even know 
    it. I hear about the recession of 19 so and so and think, wow, that did not
    affect me at all. I guess my point is, we should not look to the government to
    supply us with a job. However, raising taxes like most Democrats do, is not
    good for the economy and does not help to create jobs. Government needs to
    stand back as much as possible and let capitalism work. But liberals like Obama
    cannot stand to do that. They want to "redistribute" the wealth. That just
    does not work no matter how loud you scream or what explitives you use.
    If people know their wealth is just going to be redistributed, they stop trying
    to make it in the first place. What is the use?
    
    
  • byteback said on Oct 20, 2008....
    As far as McCain and his temper, can you blame the guy?  He agrees to use public funds and the other guy who pledged the same has now reneged and is beating him over the head with it.  DISH Network has an Obama STATION that runs his ad 24/7!  Not only that, ACORN is attempting whether purposely or by default to rig the election in favor of Democrats.  And, despite his service to his country, his long standing reputation for trying to make Washington more accountable and his own campaign's commitment to 100% transparency in campaign financing, the other guy can spend 20 years with a racist, hold a campaign party at a domestic bomber's house, buy property in tandem with a criminal, refuse to account for his campaign contributions and on and on and on and NOBODY bats an eye.  You'd be ticked too!
  • byteback said on Oct 20, 2008....
    As far as Obama goes, how do you know what he will do when he's in office?  So far he hasn't kept the few promises he's made!  Even if he had, I had a personal problem with someone telling me I MUST have health insurance for my child or they will intervene.  I have a child with autism; it is impossible to get healthcare for him.  Not only that, even if I could, insurance does not cover his costly therapies and interventions because insurance claims it's an educational problem, the educational system says it's a mental health issue and mental health providers claim it is an educational and medical issue.  So tell me how telling me I need insurance, making me pay the enormous (even with a pool system) premiums, helps me?...and that is just one issue.  He doesn't get why the problems exists.  Parents don't let something like health insurance go because we don't care.  It's because the system is broke, and it's just one of many.  Obama doesn't want to fix the systems we already have, he wants MORE programs, more rules and regulations.  All of that leads to bigger government, more costly government and never addresses the real reasons why things don't work...we need true reform, transparency in government and representation of the people and not special interest groups with deep pockets.
  • byteback said on Oct 20, 2008....
    I apologize for going off-topic.  When it comes to the position of Commander-in-Chief, I would chose McCain because he has proven that he can and is willing to sit down even with those who have differing perspectives and work things for the good of all (this from his political career), he has also shown his commitment to his country and his knowledge of the interworkings and psychology of war, and leadership in times of great distress.  He also has the reputation needed to deter an aggressive nation psychologically.
    Obama has only proven that he is an eloquent speaker.  He has not shown reputation, experience or action under the pressure of that type of circumstance.  To talk about something is not the same as living it.  I truly believe John McCain is the better choice in this area.
  • mOOn_platOOn said on Oct 20, 2008....
     
    For those who are constantly whining about McCain's "temper," I'd like to ask why? Research has recently pointed to the probability that decision-making abilities are enhanced in a state of stress, to be interpreted as "improved."
     
    But even if that's not so, if I'm Vladimir Putin, I'm afraid of John McCain. I'm not afraid of Barack Obama. My point isn't that it's better to be feared, but the flat-line emotional center of Barack Obama is just as worrisome.
     
    They say he's unflappable, but I wonder if he's "flappable?" I see no powerful emotion from this guy. His voice is is selling point, he's willing to bring in every old-school politician that's been around for the last 25 years. He hasn't mentioned ANY new blood yet in his list of advisors, and now he's happy that the jerk who sold us in the Iraq War, Colin Powell, is voting for him. Should we expect these players to still be running the ship while Obama stands on the bow yelling "I'm king of the world?"
     
    There's a time when showing that you're mad is an effective tactical tool. I've used it when managing people. Tantrums aside, a stern look and a hard tone can say a lot more than pleasantries and capitulation to the whims of would-be dictators.
     
     
  • somethingunUSual said on Oct 20, 2008....
    Nice debate going on here, but I hold my position. Using the Cuban Missile Crisis as a hypothetical is helpful because of all the variables that could have gone wrong. And it sure does sound like the only new player on the stage is going to be Long Tall himself. Senator McCain at least presents the possibility of change and government reform with someone like Governor Palin. But the Obamaniacs use logic like Joan on The View, when she said in today's episode "If she's (Palin) so much against Washington, why does she want to go there so badly?" which got a hearty round of applause. Yes, I watch The View sometimes because Elizabeth is so fucking hot and she stands up to the other 4 sisterhood of the babbling panties so well. In fact, my new fantasy is a 3some...me, Elizabeth and Sarah. Ahhhhhh.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 21, 2008....
    'From the day he is sworn into office until the last hour of his presidency, John McCain will work with anyone (Lobbyists), of either party (Keatings Five), to make this country safe (Bomb, Bomb Iran), prosperous (Make tax cuts for the mega wealthy permanent) and proud (Kill Arabs).


  • somethingunUSual said on Oct 21, 2008....
    I would say that a tag like "McCain is a mistake" is an abuse of guest tagging. Wouldn't you? But there's a reason we support who we support. Similar characteristics. I've been Ayered.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 22, 2008....
    Something to consider by Paul Waldman, Media Matters for America.

    ...when asked by pollsters, more people will call themselves "conservative" than "liberal."

    The problem with this is that people who know a lot about politics -- like journalists -- assume that ordinary people have the same interpretation of those terms as political junkies have. But the truth, as nearly a half-century of political science research has made clear, is that a significant portion of the public has little or no idea of what these terms mean in the political world. A third of the public can't even tell you which of the two major parties is the "conservative" one.
  • ALIENated said on Oct 22, 2008....
    
    All I know is my wife got an Obama-bashing email from some of her 
    liberal-to-the-max relatives yesterday. If they are bashing Obama,
    the tide has to be turning.
    
    
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 22, 2008....
    Ah... your wife. Is she like you?

    Investigation by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast released...

    According to an investigative report out today in Rolling Stone magazine, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Greg Palast, after a year-long investigation, reveal a systematic program of "GOP vote tampering" on a massive scale.

    - Republican Secretaries of State of swing-state Colorado have quietly purged one in six names from their voter rolls.

    Over several months, the GOP politicos in Colorado stonewalled every attempt by Rolling Stone to get an answer to the massive purge - ten times the average state's rate of removal.

    - While Obama dreams of riding to the White House on a wave of new voters, more then 2.7 million have had their registrations REJECTED under new procedures signed into law by George Bush.

    Kennedy, a voting rights lawyer, charges this is a resurgence of 'Jim Crow' tactics to wrongly block Black and Hispanic voters.

    - A fired US prosecutor levels new charges - accusing leaders of his own party, Republicans, with criminal acts in an attempt to block legal voters as "fraudulent."

    - Digging through government records, the Kennedy-Palast team discovered that, in 2004, a GOP scheme called "caging” ultimately took away the rights of 1.1 million voters.  The Rolling Stone duo predict that, this November 4, it will be far worse.
  • HoleInTheCosmos said on Oct 22, 2008....
     
    It would appear that ACORN is balancing the scales.
     
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 23, 2008....
    If you understood the procedure that ACORN uses it might relieve you of your prejudices. All the 'voter fraud' cases against ACORN were for voter registration forms that they themselves turned in.

    Here are some useful takes...





  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    'Using the Cuban Missile Crisis as a hypothetical' is hardly useful because it was a singularity.

    And you got the details wrong. The National Security Archive...

    The "Eyeball to Eyeball" Myth New Book One Minute to Midnight Reveals Missile-carrying Ships Already Heading Back to Soviet Union.

    The claim that Soviet missile-carrying ships turned back at the last moment after being confronted by American warships has appeared in many missile crisis books, including Robert F. Kennedy’s posthumous memoir Thirteen Days (1968), One Hell of a Gamble by Timothy Naftali and Aleksandr Fursenko (1997), and Essence of Decision by Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow (2nd edition, 1999). It was also the emotional centerpiece of a Hollywood movie on the missile crisis, Thirteen Days (2000). RFK sets the scene in his memoir:

    It was now a few minutes after 10:00 o'clock. Secretary McNamara announced that two Russian ships, the Gagarin and the Komiles, were within a few miles of our quarantine barrier. The interception of both ships would probably be before noon Washington time. Indeed, the expectation was that at least one of the vessels would be stopped and boarded between 10:30 and 11:00 o'clock.

    In fact, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev had ordered his missile-carrying ships to turn more than 24 hours before, on the morning of October 23, soon after Kennedy went on nationwide television to announce the discovery of Soviet missiles in Cuba. A record of Khrushchev’s decision is available in the minutes of a Soviet Communist party presidium meeting. [An English translation is available here.] The notes refer to an order from Khrushchev for the return of “the ships that did not arrive yet,” drawing agreement from other presidium members. “Everyone says that is correct.”
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    'Senator McCain at least presents the possibility of change and government reform'

    Tell us why in all the years McCain has been a Senator has he has never presented 'the possibility of change and government reform' but now he is?

    Adultery, gambling, the Keating 5, religious pandering, mafia ties, and his junkie wife.

    - "The thought of McCain being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me." -- Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi, who has known McCain for 35 years.

    Faiz Shakir at Think Progress makes a good point.

    An ad released by the McCain campaign states, “Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it.” In a statement today, McCain said he will “replace the outdated and ineffective patchwork quilt of regulatory oversight in Washington” and bring “accountability to Wall Street.” That promise rings hollow considering he has the former lobbyists of AIG, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, and Bank of America on his campaign staff.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    A myth about the 'Long Tall himself'...

    MYTH: Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has significantly more ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than does John McCain's

    In articles about the presidential candidates' responses to the economic crisis, the Associated Press, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the San Francisco Chronicle, and The Washington Post reported that the McCain campaign criticized Sen. Barack Obama for, in the words of McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds, "his ties to spiraling lenders like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and their jet-set CEOs." But those articles did not note that several senior McCain campaign aides have served as lobbyists for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or both. According to a Media Matters for America search of the Senate Office of Public Records' Lobbying Disclosure Act Database, they include:

    • Political adviser Charlie Black, who lobbied for Freddie Mac from 1999 to 2004;
    • National finance co-chairman Wayne Berman, who lobbied for Fannie Mae from 2004 to 2008 and for Freddie Mac in 2004;
    • Congressional liaison John Green, who lobbied for Fannie Mae from 2004 to 2007 and for Freddie Mac in 2003;
    • Arthur Culvahouse, who reportedly headed McCain's vice-presidential search team, lobbied for Fannie Mae in 1999, 2003, and 2004; and
    • William E. Timmons Sr., who reportedly "has been tapped by the McCain campaign to conduct a study in preparation for the presidential transition," lobbied for Freddie Mac from 2000 to 2008.

    Additionally, several media outlets have reported that McCain campaign manager Rick Davis previously served as president of the Homeownership Alliance, a Washington-based advocacy group whose founding members included Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which Media Matters has noted.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    Alien... where do you get this material?

    'switch to socialism'

    'Blaming our current situation on Bush is assinine'

    'Electing Obama... will punish America'

    'McCain, who is definitely qualified based on experience and know how'

    'Blacks are simply playing into the hands of elitist white liberals who are using them, as usual, to further their march toward socialism'

    'Just the unbridled bias that the media'

    'They want perversion to be legal'

    'electing a dyed in the wool 1960s style liberal/socialist'

    'edited to fit the socialist message'
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    mOOn_platOOn:

    For those who are constantly whining about McCain's "temper," I'd like to ask why? Research has recently pointed to the probability that decision-making abilities are enhanced in a state of stress, to be interpreted as "improved."
     
    What research are you using here?

    But even if that's not so, if I'm Vladimir Putin, I'm afraid of John McCain. I'm not afraid of Barack Obama. My point isn't that it's better to be feared, but the flat-line emotional center of Barack Obama is just as worrisome.

    Just in case you may have missed the news...

    McCain's Kremlin Ties

    Mark Ames & Ari Berman | October 20, 2008 issue

    He may talk tough about Russia, but John McCain's political advisors have advanced Putin's imperial ambitions...

    Maybe you refer to Rush Limbaugh? He said McCain threatened "the American way of life as we've always known it."

    By the way Putin's successor is Dmitri Medvedev.
  • somethingunUSual said on Oct 24, 2008....
    So, Gnaw .... you're for Obama because he's not McCain? I mean, you've got such in-depth analysis going on, what's the dirt on Obama? Or is he actually the reincarnation of Abraham Lincoln?
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    To put some relevance on my answer... I try to deal in the reality not the ideology.

    If you step back and look at the U.S. political system as an outsider it will be quite apparent that the two parties here are both right of center and corporate sponsored and dominated. No one in this country can become president if his credentials do not reflect that reality. It may appear that we have a democracy here but in reality we have a single, right of center, corporate party structured with two wings.

    That appearance of democracy is maintained by a compliant media that itself is almost wholly owned by the same corporate interests that sponsor and dominate the politics of any successful presidential aspirant. If it weren't for the Internet even the few independent media outlets would have disappeared from the scene long ago. We wouldn't be having this exchange either.

    My political leanings are for the progressive and green parties. I voted for Ralph Nader once for his excellent progressive understandings. I also voted for Clinton once to get rid of Bush Senior and his pack of criminals. I was disillusioned quickly with my Clinton vote when he so easily caved in to the Republican onslaught of Gingrich and company. Never again. I would rather stay on the side of the angels than lend a hand to the least evil.

    All that said. The reason I have posted so much about McCain is not that I support Obama so much. It is that there are so few here that have intentionally lied for Obama and so many that have intentionally lied for McCain.

    When I say 'intentionally lied' I mean that you intentionally pass on a 'party factoid' without checking to see if it is true or not. Without even caring if it is true or not. You intentionally pass on a 'factoid' that need not be true. That is intentionally lying.
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 24, 2008....
    As for who I would vote for. All things being equal I would never vote for a republican or a democrat as the parties are now constituted. They intentionally maintain their political dominance but patently excluding all other contenders from having a political voice.

    Witness the debates that are sponsored by The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) corporation established by the Democratic and Republican parties that is most assuredly not "nonpartisan," as it states on its website, if you are not republican or democrat. There are pro-democracy groups that are actually having to pressure the CPD "to make public the secret debate contract negotiated by the Obama and McCain campaigns." 
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 25, 2008....
    Here is an ad for McCain

  • blogtommy said on Oct 25, 2008....
    much adieu about nada...you're wasting your energy here....the election, for what it's worth, is all but over....Why continue to fight?

    Like it or not, Obama is the next US President...move on....

    Blogtommy
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 25, 2008....
    Al Qaeda Endorses John McCain

    Why can't the American people just just just vote for McCain already?

    Al-Qaida supporters suggested in a Web site message this week they would welcome a pre-election terror attack on the U.S. as a way to usher in a McCain presidency.

    The message, posted Monday on the password-protected al-Hesbah Web site, said if al-Qaida wants to exhaust the United States militarily and economically, "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    "This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then, al-Qaida will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."
  • ALIENated said on Oct 25, 2008....
    
    Simple reverse psychology. Do not throw me in that briar patch.
    
    Our enemies do not dare promote the man they really want to win. That
    would be disasterous for that candidate. Think about it. Even Biden knows
    who our enemies want and who they will test. Today, I heard Obama 
    trying to explain Biden's statements (good luck) by saying either new
    president would be tested. Yeah right.
    
    Just because you do not want to recognize that the surge has worked
    and the terrorist network in the middle east is on its last leg, does not
    mean that it is not happening. What would be the cost of another 9/11
    type attack. Millions (billions?) of dollars went up in smoke on that day.
    
    And the money we are spending on the war could easily be made back if
    we start drilling for our own oil, if the Democrats will allow us to spend
    our money here instead of sending it to our enemies. Drill on public lands,
    put the money back in the treasury. Why must we compromise with our
    enemies as Obama would have us do?
    
    And the election has not happened yet, no matter how the media would
    like to persuade us that it has. And brace yourself for the outcome. It
    may not be pretty. The election is not a popularity contest. The popular
    vote does not matter. Every single person in California and New York can
    vote for Obama, but each state still has only so many electoral votes. Is
    that beautiful or what? Just the way our founders wanted it. One or two 
    highly populated states cannot dictate the direction of the whole country.
    Plus, there is this ...
    
    
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_effect
    
    I would urge anyone that believes in what this country stands for and
    wants McCain to win had better go vote. The other side is, big time.
    
    Never say never. But que sera sera.
    
    
  • GnawingDog said on Oct 26, 2008....
    From my read it was an unaffiliated contributor who was the "Al-Qaida supporter" not the real "Al-Qaida."

    The message is credited to a frequent and apparently respected contributor named Muhammad Haafid. However, Haafid is not believed to have a direct affiliation with al-Qaida plans or knowledge of its operations.

    "Today, I heard Obama trying to explain Biden's statements (good luck) by saying either new president would be tested. Yeah right."

    Here is Biden's actual interview with crazy Barbara West "saying either new president would be tested."



    Since these fly in the face of the facts where is your evidence for "the surge has worked," "the terrorist network in the middle east is on its last leg," and "the money we are spending on the war could easily be made back if we start drilling for our own oil."
  • mixednuts said on Nov 14, 2008....
    McCain: The man who cheated on his wife and dumped her while she was dying of cancer after she waited for him while he was a P.O.W. Now there's true Christian values! Obama won the election! GET OVER IT!
  • GnawingDog said on Nov 16, 2008....
    click me!

Comment on "In Support of Senator McCain"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)

Talk about the security of the Country and start discussing ways to protect it....