• SeanRenaud said on Sep 14, 2008....

  Obama plans to cut taxes and really the only person he's screwing are those who are really rich (I don't agree with this strategy, but the truth is it seems to work defying all logic.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama#Taxation  So your speaking on his taxes is just lies and propaganda.
   
  Obama has sworn to hunt down terrorists.  Going as far as to claim he would send troops in Pakistan with or without permission? http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,144560,00.html?ESRC=topstories.RSS
   
  http://articles.latimes.com/2007/aug/02/nation/na-obama2
   
  Seriously, does Obama need to to nuke Russia now, and send assassins into N. Korea two years ago to be considered tough on terrorists?
   
  So your claiming that Obama wouldn't use the military to defend this nation comes from one of three places.  A.  Your lying.  B.  You think he's lying C. You simply haven't researched any of Obama's actual stances.
   
  I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's mostly C, and the rest is B.

• ALIENated said on Sep 14, 2008....

  
  Come on, Sean. There is only one choice because Obama is a liberal / socialist
  Democrat ... he is lying. But we will most likely never know because the public
  is being reminded again, as they usually have to be before a presidential
  election, that politicians like Borax will say anything to get what they want.
  
  What most fail to see, as curmudgeon points out, is that the Republican 
  party today is more closely aligned with the Democrat party of JFK's day
  than the Democrat party today. Both partys have moved to the left,
  unfortunately, and the Democrat party is almost off the scale. Many party
  faithfuls (we all have them in our families) think the Democrat party still
  stands for the things it stood for in days gone by. It does not. It stands
  for abortion, perversion, globalism, socialism, atheism, on and on. The 
  Democrat party of today is more aligned with the devil than with JFK. And 
  that is a fact, Jack. According to ALIENipedia.
  
  

• SeanRenaud said on Sep 15, 2008....

  The fact that Republicans and Democrats have switched bodies several times isn't really debatable.  Say what you want about gays and blacks and women being separate issues but the fact remains that really the only people who think that freedom to do what you want is somehow different based on some detail that doesn't effect them is ONLY held by oppresors.  Yeah Lincoln freed the slaves?  Who cares.
   
  The Dems do stand for freedom, freedom of choice, freedom of speech.  I wish they stood for atheism but they lack the courage to stand up like men and would still rather be sheep and it's disgusting that men would rather live as sheep than men.  I hope I'm there to see when you stand up and accept how incredible you are and stop bowing your head but I doubt it will happen. 
   
  1.  Globalism is a good thing.
  2.  Gobalism is inevitable
  3.  Despite occasionally being stupid beyond all reason because a global government means the end times in your mythology republicans have done more aid globalization via moving jobs over seas and sending money over seas to avoid taxes than Dems ever have.  You can argue that higher taxes on the rich caused such a thing but unless you want to grant Dems as a whole some kind of borderline psychic level of genuis they obviously didn't overtax Bill Gates so he would send money overseas, so their economies would grow  so the world's economics would level out and guys in India would start to live like people in the US.  Hell Lex Luthor's plots aren' that convoluted..
   
  I do hate socialism.  The question is how much socialism do you need to mix into the system to keep the poor from murdering all of us.  I know you believe that evil is genetic and that evil people are just evil, there is no reason why the poor are more likely to be involved in drug dealing or theft.  The rich are just lucky and don't have those genes.  For those of us who deal more often in reality though we recognize that there is a vested interest in the middle and upper clases in keeping the poor from hitting rock bottom.

• curmudgeon said on Sep 15, 2008....

  Didn't Obama say he would negotiate with North Korea and Iran without precondition? If that's his position, what kind of terrorist hunter would he be?
   
  Invade Pakistan? Attack a nuclear power with a substantial Pakistani population in the United States? Gee, that would result in destabilizing the entire subcontinent, causing all kinds of violence in India and economic turmoil in a region that is now on a fast-track to relative affluence.
   
  If that's Obama's policy position, I don't need to research it because on the face of it it's plainly suicidal. He's more of an idiot than I thought.
   
  As to tax policy, I'm more into creating opportunities for all than taxing one because it's "more fair" to the other. And Obama himself has stated that he would be cautious about raising taxes on anyone if it might hurt the economy. Oh, wait - raising taxes on "the wealthy" is supposed to aid in economic recovery! Why is he now tiptoeing around the issue?
   
  The truth is you don't know what Obama will do once he's in office. I submit that he will do nothing but follow Biden's lead. During this campaign, he has shifted his position on the surge, on taxation, on drilling, on Iraq. If elected, Obama will govern by poll and prove to be one of the most ineffective Presidents since Jimmy Carter.

Comment on "Is Obama really Kennedy?"

Currently tagged	Obama Reality Check politics humor presidential campaign (Click to add tags below)
Tag this post	(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Your comment