I've finished reading Client's latest piece, and may I say,
Oh
My
God!
I.........I..........I...........
have no words. I have no words.
This is the largest load of "who gives a toss" I have ever had the
misfortune to read.
What makes Client think anyone would be even remotely interested in his
paranoid mutterings?
Who, in heaven's name, cares a fig about how posts on blog sites attain
featured status?
Paige, do I remember correctly? Didn't Client once write an op ed piece (or 10)
about his dissatisfaction with the way the bestselling authors list was
compiled? And didn't the ABA
give in and change the template, allowing Client to reach the #1 spot for a
time?
So, why is he crying discrimination once more?? No one cares! We can't sell this, it won't do.
The man is an idiot, I don't care what BB thinks. He may feel sorry for him,
but I don't. He's pitiful, I grant you, but I don't pity him. He's just
laughable. I laugh at him. Ha ha. I’m sorry, but I’m tired.
And still, I edit:
Often those who are "informed" of the mechanic’s behind (The mechanic’s behind? THE MECHANIC’S BEHIND???) the pages of SoulCast are those who mostly support one another in the pages of SoulCast with mass subscriptions to one another and knew the operating methodology of the program currently utilized here.
This entire paragraph makes my eyes bleed but let’s focus on tense for now. “Are” is present, “knew” is past. Use one tense or the other, not both. "To one another" is redundant.
A conjunction needs an apostrophe; ‘let’s’ is actually ‘let us’. You must replace the missing letter with an apostrophe. Why do you insist on throwing apostrophes around willy-nilly??
“…the mechanic’s behind” refers to the arse of the mechanic.
“Lets” is more than one let. Now, that’s (that is) just silly!
* " Users are able to subscribe to each
other and tags
they are interested in. "These
subscriptions are used
as a means to implicitly [ rate
] post .... which allow
“good post" to filter to the
top {feature page} and....
[ spam ] post to be moved out
of the site without
any manual work done by
the users or myself....
Is this a quote? I don’t see a name. If it is a quote, it behooves you to quote correctly and to give credit to the author. You don’t want your readers to think the author didn’t use proper grammar.
I would read this to mean the program recognizes {spam} vs. users
due to any given post to have subscriptions {personas} and recognized
{subscribed tags} tags of actual users vs spam created post that would
not have subscribers or subscription tags.
I am in hell. I am in a hell in which insane drunks are issued laptops and forced to record every asinine thought that pops into their heads. I have been sent to this hell by the vengeful cookbook god because I was instrumental in allowing Mrs. Seinfeld’s collection of plagiarized recipes to go to print.
Pray for me.
Mr. Pendable is working on revisions with Client today.
Trying to steer Client away from this latest rant and back to the business at hand won't be easy, I don't envy him. Dr Gigi is in Belfast this week with BB, Bambi, and B.O'toni.
I think I'll stop by Ex's office and see if he's making any progress.
http://www.soulcast.com/post/show/149634/Is-there-Censorship-and-Discrimination-in-SoulCast%3F