Can you please identify, enumerate and describ each of the different scientific theories? thanks. :)
Can you please identify, enumerate and describ each of the different scientific theories? thanks. :)
To me, the most convincing explanation for the origin of the universe, let alone the world, was given by Terry Pratchett, the author of the 'Discworld' books.
He said that once upon a time there was absolutely nothing at all, and it exploded.
After all, before the 'Big Bang' there was nothing,was there?
Creationism-At a broad level, a Creationist is someone who believes in a god who is absolute creator of heaven and earth, out of nothing, by an act of free will.
Big Bang Theory-According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago.
I am sure that you are familiar with Creationism.
If you need more info on The Big Bang, go to:
http://www.big-bang-theory.com/
When I posted my comment: "To me, the most convincing explanation for the origin of the universe, let alone the world, was given by Terry Pratchett, the author of the 'Discworld' books."
I also meant to say, that the other possibility or belief, is that of creationism, which I have always believed. but I do believe there are other possibilities that do not contradict creationism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...
http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/g...
http://faculty.weber.edu/bdattilo//fossi...
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A08578...
Creationists and evolutionists, Christians and non-Christians all have the same evidence—the same facts. Think about it: we all have the same earth, the same fossil layers, the same animals and plants, the same stars—the facts are all the same.
The difference is in the way we all interpret the facts. And why do we interpret facts differently? Because we start with different presuppositions. These are things that are assumed to be true, without being able to prove them. These then become the basis for other conclusions. All reasoning is based on presuppositions (also called axioms). This becomes especially relevant when dealing with past events.
somehow we've gotten from the origins of the universe to blaming men for all the misery in this world.
Women have been with us every step of the way. Feminists have drummed it into our heads over and over that women were and still largely are the ones responsible for the educating, rearing and socializing of children. If women want to know why they've been "exploited" all these years, look to mom before blaming dear old dad.
As to the Big Bang, I'm not sure that the assumption is that there was nothing. Elements existed, but then were drawn together, then ripped apart due to a tremendous buildup of pressure.
In other words, as far as we can tell, the materials that now make up the universe were always here in some fashion. We just don't know what there was (or was not) before the Big Bang. And the Big Bang itself may be replaced someday as our observations reach deeper into the early universe.
As to the account in Genesis - to call this a "theory" means to admit that is may be disproven one day. as are many theories rooted in observable fact. Religious truth has to be on a plane of its own if it is to be of any use to us at all. If we root our religious beliefs in material rationalism we will look like complete idiots every time this topic comes up.
When the views entertained in this volume ... are generally admitted, we can dimly foresee that there will be a considerable revolution in natural history."
- Charles Darwin,