sista2sista's tags:
sista2sista reads (1):
Who's reading sista2sista (1):

The page you were looking for no longer exists

The so called Founding Fathers were actually criminals, adulterers, pedophiles, rapists, fornicators, child murderers, and the list just flows.  George Washington was one of the criminals.
 
Being a slave owner of Blacks, positioned him to have free liberty to molest as many slave children as he so desired.  And he did.  He, as did Thomas Jefferson fathered many children through the raping of children.  And like Thomas Jefferson, George sold even his own children into slavery that he fathered through his wicked unsatiable act of rape.  And no doubt, just like America has called the rape of Sally Hemings by Thomas Jefferson a "Love Story" (Whatever.  Raping children is not a love story, nor is the continual raping of children, but rather it is a crime of passion, a crime that victimizes the weakest of the prey), America also glorifies George Washington for his raping of Black children.
 
People say that there is no evidence that George Washington was a rapist of slave children.  Whatever.  The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.  Historians, publishers, and others have always hidden, deleted, and so on, many truths of great people and events.  
 
It's not hard to conclude that George wasequal  with Thomas in pedophilia.  And as it were then in George's time, the first female that a slave owner had sex with was with a black slave, and majority of them were girls, not women slaves.
 
Remember Mt. Rushmore's carving of George?  America glorifies pedophiles, but yet America has tough laws against sex with children.  Don't misunderstand me.  I love to be in America, but I don't have to like its double standards of morals.    More on George later.   
 
 
 
 


del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • SeanRenaud said on May 30, 2008....
    What proof is there that either of them were pedophiles?  I mean if we are just making outlandish claims with no proof whatsoever then I'm going to make a claim. 
     
    Slavery was the best thing to happen to niggers, they were lining up to get on the boat to America and whites were good people who paid for room and board and only occasionally asked for the blacks to help out.  Then like today blacks were lazy and often refused.  The emancipation proclimation didn't free slaves, it made it illegal for blacks to demand to be fed and cared for without contributing anything to society.  Historians are just you know. . .lying.
  • sheltercrow said on May 30, 2008....
    George Washington was not a saint...


    Quander has spent a lifetime tracing his roots. For him, all roads lead to this cabin at George Washington's Mount Vernon estate. It is here, in a small log and mud cabin, that one of his relatives, Nancy Carter Quander, was born into slavery.

    "When you come here and you see this, it comes to life," he said.

    A Representation of Cruelty

    The Mount Vernon cabin is a recreation of how most of George and Martha Washington's hundreds of slaves lived. As many as a dozen people were forced to share a space smaller than the average modern day garage, with little heat, light or comfort.

    "You can talk about slavery all you want, but it's not until you actually are confronted by it physically, I think, that you get to have a better understanding," said historical architect Dr. Dennis Pogue. "And so when you walk into that little tiny cabin, it really hits you."

    This feeling of shock is exactly what Pogue, who led the cabin's reconstruction using only historical descriptions and a single photograph as his guide, was going for. In fact, he hopes this cabin shocks visitors into thinking about the inhumanity and cruelty of slavery in a real way, not just as a distant, abstract notion.

  • sheltercrow said on May 30, 2008....

    QUESTION: Did George Washington know West Ford, or his mother, Venus?

    FORD FAMILY: We contend that George Washington did in fact know Venus and West.

    Ford oral history states that Venus was a young girl when she was first asked to "comfort" George Washington. She also met George Washington on his visits to Bushfield before and after the Revolutionary War. Ford oral history further states that after Venus became pregnant with West, Washington no longer had sexual relations with her. When asked by Hannah Washington who the father of her child was, Venus replied, "The Ole General be the father, mistress."

  • SeanRenaud said on May 30, 2008....
    How young was she?  This is important because if she's gone through puberty then he's not a pedo.  This was doubly true in older times.  I didn't once deny he had slaves, we know he had slaves, I didn't doubt for a second he fucked some of those slaves.  I owned Tyra Banks, Beyonce Knowles or Halle Berry you'd best believe I'd be turning them inside out every single night.  So it stands to reason that George probably fucked some slaves.  (Though to be fair the level of consent is difficult to confirm.  I'm sure that slaves fucking the Master got beat less and ate better so I'd be willing to bet there was some competition over George's cherry tree.
     
    So how young, and what source are you using Shelter?
  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    GW was a man of his time. Up until a century ago it was customary here to marry off your female children at a young age.

    The point of the comment was to highlight GW's hypocrisy. All the wealthy of the colonies would not make the obvious conclusion that blacks had been the victims of circumstance. That circumstance being their capture and enslavement, as men, to serve the economic purposes of other men. The FF's would never admit publicly that their wealth was to a large extent based on the enslavement of fellow men. Hence the excuses they concocted.

    To my knowledge not one FF freed their slaves while they could make money off their enslavement. Manumission after their death means nothing when they enslaved them while they were alive.

    Last but not least GW emerged from the revolution as the wealthiest man in the states. He no longer needed to employ slaves. That he still refused to free his own slaves is testament to his nature. It doesn't matter what he writes it matters what he does.

    The links are placed in the first sentence of the comments.

  • SeanRenaud said on May 31, 2008....
    Yes it was customary to marry your women off as soon as they could have children, again this doesn't make you a pedo.
     
    They didn't consider slaves people.  They were considered animals and really not much has changed, now it's the poor instead of the blacks but that's human kind, that's the way the world works and possibly the one way that it can work.
  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    The FF's well knew that the slaves were humans and not animals. The blacks were originally indentured servants like all the rest that served the colonial crown/property class. Blacks were intentionally transformed politically into "slave/animal" because they were easy to identify. The characterization of the black as a "slave" to the exclusion of all other definitions and colors was intentional and done only in the western hemisphere at the end of the 16th century.
  • SeanRenaud said on May 31, 2008....
    It wasn't that long ago that we were breeding for specific traits and thought that some human beings were inheritly worth less than other men.  It's true that they were chosen because they were easily identified however.
     
    Besides there is a huge divide between knowing something and believing something.  I'm quite certain that the Nazi's knew that Jews, blacks and cripples were human.  They didn't believe it though.
     
     
  • SeanRenaud said on May 31, 2008....
    It wasn't that long ago that we were breeding for specific traits and thought that some human beings were inheritly worth less than other men.  It's true that they were chosen because they were easily identified however.
     
    Besides there is a huge divide between knowing something and believing something.  I'm quite certain that the Nazi's knew that Jews, blacks and cripples were human.  They didn't believe it though.
     
     
  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    The characterization of the black as a "slave" to the exclusion of all other definitions and colors was intentional and done only in the western hemisphere at the end of the 17th century.
  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    Eugenics was originally advocated in the United States and exported to Germany via Great Britain. The Nazis did not start the eugenics movement but adopted it from American sources.
  • SeanRenaud said on May 31, 2008....
    I just said that it started in the US. 
     
    My comment on the Nazis was only to illustrate that there is division between knowing something and believing something.  I highly doubt that any body in any war has truly believed that the people they were fighting weren't human, but they acted as if they weren't because they believed they weren't.
  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    We were tangling with your "They didn't consider slaves people" so your "division between knowing something and believing something" can only work here if you think the FF's knew that slaves were people but intentionally acted as if they believed they weren't for the intention of commercial gain.

    The operative phrase here is "the FF's knew that slaves were people but intentionally acted as if they believed they weren't for the intention of commercial gain."

    "They didn't consider slaves [to be] people."

    Hum... No... Blacks were defined as slaves first for the intention of commercial gain. Then the black slaves were later defined as non-human animals to justify their enslavement. It wasn't meant to be logical; it was an after the fact excuse to try and justify their odious enslavement of humans for greed.

  • sheltercrow said on May 31, 2008....
    Hum... No... Blacks were forced into slavery and defined as slaves first for the intention of commercial gain. Then the black slaves were later defined as non-human animals to provide a post-facto justification for their enslavement. It wasn't meant to be logical; it was an after the fact excuse to try and justify their odious enslavement of humans for greed.
  • SeanRenaud said on Jun 01, 2008....
    You really really good at arguing for no good reason SC.  How many ways to I need to say you're right before you get it?
     
    We're arguing over semantics, and not even important semantics.
  • sheltercrow said on Jun 01, 2008....
    The importance of any comment is in the detail my friend.

    "They didn't consider slaves people" says little of the reality involved a more about the person who commented. If your intelligent, and I know you are, fill in the details as you understand them. I, and everyone else interested, am always intrigued to learn some detail that we may have missed. I have seen you do it elsewhere quite well.

    If I may be so bold... you may never again have such an opportunity to learn and teach as you have here.
  • SeanRenaud said on Jun 01, 2008....
    At some point you start debating semantics and it becomes detrimental to the people who are learning.  This is a case of not seeing the forest because we debating if this is an American Aligator or an American Crocodile.
     
    The American Crododile has never been confirmed as a threat to man kind and yet have been over hunted.  People should be ashamed of themselves. *You
     
    The Aligator has however been shown to be a threat at times, and they have very similar hunting tactics, share a range of the south east United States and uh, I highly doubt that most people being dragged into the water by an eight foot lizard are conserning themselves with head shape or tooth alignment.  * Me
     
    Is that an excuse for over hunting? *You
     
    No, there is no excuse but the fact is that it was an understandable position taken in a time when these threats were real.  I'm not claiming these people to be saints but to claim that this is the most important thing they did is loony* Me
     
    Well I never claimed that the only thing we should focus on is that George Washington was a baby fucking slave owner who had no respect for women.  That was Sista, I only came here and cosigned that shit. *You
     
    I didn't say that, I said that America celebrates pedophiles despite having strict laws against it!  I can't really prove that GW was a pedo either, I just know he slept with young girls but there is little proof that she was this that or the other.  *Sista
  • sheltercrow said on Jun 01, 2008....
    Hum... you lost my interest again... later.
  • MidniteToker said on Oct 31, 2008....
    Not just sex maniacs. straight up cannibals. lol. They made forks out of bones, man. Check it, "the washingtonians - masters of horror"....now you know the truth. 

Comment on "THE FOUNDING FATHERS WERE FONDLING FATHERS"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

It had to happen eventually....
Depressing to lose interest in a beloved series by such a matter after enjoying it immensely all of these years, but leave it to Russell T Davies to throw his beloved fans into a dark ditch. Way to go you tool!...
they sure are fun!...
Guess who called me for the first time during my lunch time? Yeah, he did. I was at the drive through getting ready to buy my mini hot fudge cake. I've found you can eat those only for lunch and actually lose weight. I normally call him after I've h...
Diarrhea is defined as the increase in the frequency of bowel movements or decrease in the stool's consistency....