ddodd's tags:
ddodd reads (2):
Who's reading ddodd (6):
Came across this article randomly, and it made me want to shoot someone. ||{1}||. The [i]Catholic[/i] church is saying they don't condone gays!?? This is a crock of shit in light of all the homo priests molesting little boys. Have they taken a look at all the lives they've ruined? Fuck those hypocrite Catholics. I'm not saying let's liberate the homos out there, but screw the Catholics for being a bunch of pervert molestors. Homos aren't going to heaven, but the Catholic church isn't exactly giving God a good name either.

del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • bloc said on May 09, 2006....
    easy big fella! I've never understood christian reasoning against gays. They take some weird part of the bible very literally, but if you remind them that the New Testament says to 'gouge out your eyes if they cause you to lust' they'll say it doesn't really mean that. Are they taking the bible at it's word or not?
  • underdog said on May 09, 2006....
    No matter what the religion, it's the fanatics like ddodd that you need to watch out for. Hey ddodd, why don't you leave the harmless gays alone and look at what unintelligent folks like you and Bush followers have done and do to people. Gay's aren't causing harm, it's the extremists like you.
  • ddodd said on May 09, 2006....
    You talk about sympathizing with gays? Well then stop spreading disease. They don't call it GAIDS for no reason. And don't preach to me about what the bible says. Without heterosexual unions, the population would cease to exist. Gayness is a lifestyle, it's not the way the world was meant to be.
  • anonymous said on May 09, 2006....
    WOW, you've got to be joking right? What era are you in? You must be stuck somewhere in the sticks in Indiana or Alabama. I didn't think backwards people like you still existed in this day and age. Good luck trying to function in real society...
  • bloc said on May 09, 2006....
    ddodd, a ||{1}||
  • anonymous said on May 09, 2006....
    Let me guess, ddodd, you're a loyal member of the KKK, too right? Your type give Americans and open-minded Conservatives a very bad name. Gays aren't to blame for AIDS. Everyone spreads it, no matter what the color or the race or the sexual orientation. Heterosexuals are just as bad when it comes to spreading disease. We just need to educate people on how to prevent spreading it, and it's something everyone should learn about, no matter what orientation you are.
  • ddodd said on May 16, 2006....
    Unfortunately, I'm not a member of the KKK. One day, perhaps, one day. And yes, GAYs are responsible for spreading AIDs. As are blacks. These two are proven to be the most promiscuous when it comes to the number of partners. Here are the stats, clear as day, so pull your head out of your ass and tell me now that AIDs isn't being spread by these two groups. AIDS in USA: 35% were white 43% were black 20% were Hispanic 1% were of other race/ethnicity. Of the adults and adolescents2 with AIDS, 77% were men. Of these men, 58% were men who had sex with men (MSM) 21% were injection drug users (IDU) 11% were exposed through heterosexual contact 8% were both MSM and IDU.
  • anonymous said on May 16, 2006....
    you can't throw out numbers without a link to the source
  • ddodd said on May 16, 2006....
    This is an AIDS charity, for the one who's too chicken shit to come forth with a username. http://www.avert.org/statsum.htm And here, read #33, #55, #137 http://www.hivaidssearch.com/facts/hiv_aids_factual_statistics.htm Gays & AIDS http://www.thebody.com/cdc/news_updates_archive/2003/jan29_03/san_francisco_aids.html Moron, read the stats.
  • SamuraiGirl said on May 18, 2006....
    I don't see why ppl are so against homosexuality. They only accept it if it's for women (because men like to see women going at it w/one another for some odd reason) And about Catholics being against homosexuality. They refer to the bible for EVERYTHING. But the bible also used to say that slavery was okay. And look how screwed up that thought is! So, if the bible was wrong about slavery being good, don't you think it's wrong about homosexuality being bad? And it also says that women brought the descent of man. We only get it from the male perspective. Didn't they bother to get Eve's p.o.v? Okay, I'm going off topic. But the point is, the Catholic Church needs to REALLY read over the Bible before they go against homosexuals. It's not religion; it's racism and homophobia. -_-
  • sagari said on May 19, 2006....
    If we put aside Bible for a while and collect pure facts, we will see that homosexuality is a common phenomenon in nature. Most of mammals, human beings included, are known to practice homosexuality (I suppose all the ado is about sexual intercourse, the rest isn't even taken into account). We are all bisexual by nature. What preferences we take depends on where we live, in what, so to say, social environment, of too many a factor to rule out homosexuality as 'perversion'. Homosexuality is just one of the options. And the homo/bi percentage is not that high to spread havoc. Methinks, the percentage is more or less constant. In countries where homosexuality was a crime, homosexual people didn't extinct - they just went 'under cover'. Population isn't endangered, since
  • sagari said on May 19, 2006....
    ...since homosexuals aren't the majority. Homosexuality is a good test of freedom of speech, freedom of choice.
  • eclectic79 said on May 21, 2006....
    The majority of cases where molestation occurred within the Catholic Church were between male priests and girls. It is pretty interesting to note however that a lot of gay individuals who struggle with sexual orientation and faith often choose to enter the church. If, due to their religion, they're not supposed to have sex with others of the same gender, then what better way to ensure that than a vow of celibacy? And in terms of HIV/AIDS... usually when a group is disproporitonately affected by a disease, it's because they are not getting the education, health care, and services that are required to comat the spread of it. It shows that the government, society, and surrounding communities aren't providing them with the resources required to adequately provide prevention and care. Think about school - how many young gay men were ever taught about how to protect themselves from HIV in their sex education class? It's people that throw blame that we need to look out for. When HIV/AIDS first came out, it was labeled as a gay white male disease. Now communities of color in this country are being affected because they went along with those presumptions. However, worldwide HIV & AIDS is shifting more towards the heterosexual population and women. Casting blame about a disease gets nothing done - in fact it makes things worse. Instead of pulling some numbers off a website, try checking out the articles which were written by people more qualified. I would say their interpretation of the numbers are more reliable than yours (or mine).
  • ddodd said on May 22, 2006....
    The catholic church is a crock, so I won't get into their foundation for hypocrisy and self-righteous glorification. As for Gays helping to spread and not CURB AIDS, well this is pretty much a fact. And if you're arguing that gay men were never taught to protect themselves, then you couldn't be more wrong. Sex education in today's schools has taught both genders and orientations that you can pass on disease through intercourse, which encompasses both anal or vaginal. For the past few decades, we have been drilled into our heads that CONDOMS help prevent disease. Well studies again show that most homosexuals do not use condoms during sex. Studies also show that many homosexuals engage in more sexual activity with multiple partners than your average heterosexual.These two factors combined equals a recipe for the spreading of disease. And the sad fact is, many homosexuals will often practice bisexual behavior, which then spreads the disease to heterosexuals, instead of containing the disease within their own orientation. So it's bad enough that some is gay, but how detrimental is it to society when a gay person can't decide on his or her orientation and becomes bisexual part-time and helps spread diseases to not only their own kind, but to everyone else.
  • kelly said on May 22, 2006....
    Come on, folks. ddodd is trolling you. Nobody is that ignorant. At least not the ones who can type.
  • anonymous said on May 23, 2006....
    Why not use your energy to do something positive instead? Clearly you hold a grudge to some adult who used you as a child, and it's sooooo obvjous you are a closeted gay man (very, very deep inside -- dare to look?) so I feel sorry about your self hatered and bitterness. But that does not give you the right to lie and hate gay persons. Embrace love, light and you too will become a beautiful person full of love and acceptance. That is the way to live.
  • anonymous said on May 27, 2006....
    LOL You're so right he's gay and he's in the closet lol, I'll just put this here because I agree with it:
  • BJFrapp said on May 27, 2006....
    "If I have to spend an eternity of eternities burning in hell, it would be better than spending one good day in heaven with you!"
  • BULL said on Jun 02, 2006....
    When the church detours off the message,of spirituality,responsability,and forgiveness,we have all lost.
  • BULL said on Jun 02, 2006....
    If they need a church to have good morals,be humble and resposible,then their chemical brain functions dont work and church wont help.They just cant understand because the brain power is not available to them,so its useless to try and explain it them.Its like a child with a hammer,he doesn't know to hit nails with it,thats why your lamps,windows,tables,and everything else are broken.Thats why we dont give children hammers for toys,because their little brain is just that,little.
  • penile said on Jun 02, 2006....
    sux meh fatty pen0r fag u r gettin GAIDS in ur facehole niggard.
  • lidstrom06 said on Jun 05, 2006....
    I'm not a Catholic, but I am a Christian, and while the Catholic church has been WAY hypocritical, the Christian church has been just as bad. Why? We all have free choice. People blame God or the Bible for bad things happening, but we choose to carry out bad things ourselves and refuse to take the blame. Bad things like rascism, bigotry, prejudice. Homosexuals, in my belief, are contrary to God's creation. It's unnatural. At the same time, they need to be treated as human beings. Many gays and lesbians claim that they do not have a choice, that they were born that way. I think that parents have much responsibility in that, and that the more tolerant society is of homosexual behavior, the more people will be opened up to ridicule. About the Bible's stance: there is some crazy shiz in the Bible, most of which comes from the fact that it was written in a time where society was MUCH different from it is now. Much of the Bible is to be taken at face value, but people (like Jesus) in it also speak figuratively. If the Bible is to be quoted or talked about, it must be because we read it and sought meaning, not regurgitating skeptical views of it. It comes down to this: homosexuality is wrong according to God's morality, but the Bible also declares that the greatest commandment is to love God, and love others as yourself. Meaning, no matter a person's flaws or sins, they must be loved as a brother/sister. Why is that important? Because it is the perfect weapon against prejudice and bigotry. Think about it.
  • ACaringNeighbor said on May 28, 2009....
    Honestly, ddodd. You can't possibly be this racist, sexist, and homophobic all at the same time. You must be faking some of this. NO ONE is this stupid.
  • patrick144000 said on May 28, 2009....
    From the sounds of it, ddodd would really like some black penis.  Why else would he be so crazy bigoted and angry?  Unless he just isn't getting any, and is just pissed off about sex in general.

Comment on "Homos and the church"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Not to be mistaken for the Flaky Cafe'!!!

Mysticism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysticism


Mysticism (my trusty Webster's New World dictionary):

The doctrine or beliefs of mystics; specif., t...
Being on this site and meet people of various ethnic background and different beliefs....
Simply, the answer is NO! It doesn't jibe with the rudimentary doctrines of Jesus or even our own sense of morality. Who can condemn a newborn baby for sin? Who can say Adam condemned us all by sinning? It's a crazy concept!...
WHAT'S IN MY HEART...
RIDING OUT THE STORMS...