Dear SC
I have found a blogger for you to look at with several pages of posts. "Having sex with 10-12 year olds is good" being in part of one post. I refuse to open the links and I request that you do close the account of this user when you have a moment to do so.
http://www.soulcast.com/citruslove12/
soulcast_help posted on Apr 28, 2008
| views: 297
Comments
-
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 28, 2008....
Try this one too...Fritt made friends with this one. Yeah, I clicked the link only to see the comment and need I say more? -
anonymous said on Apr 28, 2008....
Pedo here too -
silverwhisper said on Apr 28, 2008....
thank you, daily--we gotta keep this up when we see it, i think. :>
ed -
hottips4u said on Apr 28, 2008....
I just hope in providing these links in this fashion does not lead to what becomes a
" Table of Contents ".....unwittingly.
Hottips4u
Jessi
-
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 28, 2008....
Here's nakedpornchicks who tags with "Kiddie Porn"Ed: It's not taking much, just searching tags inside of the SC search box. 10 minutes...maybe?? The first difficulty is to actually be able to stomach typing in the "keywords" and then actually going to the user(s) page and being able to stomach the post titles and tags. I've had to go into posts a couple of times and just reading a line or two is all it took. I DO NOT want to read these things while finding these people, but I don't want to report someone who is writing about a legit news story on the same subject to be put in the same category.Jessi: I totally understand what you're saying. I just felt like I had to do this in response to a comment that SC left me on a post. It took me more time to decide how to "report" these violators than it did to find them. Maybe SC Help will actually delete the post here when they get around to deleting the accounts...maybe. -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Really I think that this is doing more harm than good. SC hasn't shown much in the way of deleting these, but to his credit Frittz hasn't shown himself to be the kind of guy that responds to his own blog 80 zillion times to keep it on the front page. This just brings him back into the limelight. Ignoring these types is the only defense we have. -
vacantmind said on Apr 28, 2008....
I'm in agreement that these should be removed. -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
But they won't be. -
hottips4u said on Apr 28, 2008....
Daily : For lack of a better method and this being the only method soulcast presents its membership, I see we have little choice but to, as sean says : Make them Front Page News and not allow them the sanctuary and peace of existing in the shadows but always on the fringe awaiting the opportunity to spread their activities.
Jessi.
"Sean"....what assures you... they wont be ? -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Has any of Fritz's stuff been removed?The fact that Soulcast advertises as Uncensored Blogging mens there is a decent chance they could be sued if they do delete these posts.What we are doing here is advertising for the the pedos. Freedom of Speech is a bitch sometimes you have to lump it and this is one of those times. -
hottips4u said on Apr 28, 2008....
Some times Sean, its a rare oddity as a thought, as thoughts go. But sometimes it feels like I am a part of a greater cause than merely condemning into oblivion with total disregard the right to be creative.
However, just as those who were once asked to give up their seat, I as a Mother would feel a total disregard for the safety of my own children if I, am forced from my seat to accommodate the whim of a criminal over my right as a law abiding citizen.
After all, I condemned the taking of over 400 hundred children under what imo represented less than probable cause. That I feel is intrusive to individuals 4th amend rights and the boundaries, if any yet exist. Few seemed shocked and seemed to be desensitized knowing " oh well, big bro does as big bro wants....", just another, albeit whimsier moment .
But I see the pressure expanding on the parameters of free speech...almost seeking Judicial review...either to etch the definition onto to stone or remove the levy and watch the lines now cast in sand be awash in irony.
Those forces are none less in the European medium that this type of influence is making in roads to American homes every second of every day. Trying to change the face of America until little will be recognizable.
Not for lack of trying, but more a part of am I. Perhaps no longer a warrior, but a more informed critic as a circumstance thereof.
I sincerely believe that an overall approach to any given civil society is its core belief in protecting all its citizenry, good and bad, young and old.
However, I also believe that there exist within any civil society certain elements that wish to undermine even the integrity of desensitized masses. This will simply increase the victim pool vs. predatory humans in general and elitist alike.
It can not remain unchallenged, hidden and unexplored as to its worth to any given society interested in exchanging heinous for civil decency amongst the masses.
There is in all things extremes. Yet need we utilize an extreme simply because we acknowledge its existence, albeit as softly as possible resting within any given populace, an unwritten pledge to stay low and make no waves, and pick your targets carefully and we shall be accepting ???
Thats how I seen it being presented. Besides, I again, refuse to be forced up from my seat for the likes of which we discuss herein.
Hottips4u
Jessi.
-
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 28, 2008....
Well, guys/gals...I guess it's a catch 22 situation all around.
Bring them to the front page...I wouldn't, myself, want to do that. However, I see the point in bringing it to the front page. I'm just going the route I was told to go and it appears that this "Help" page isn't checked and dealt with fast enough, IMO. I wasn't kidding when I said I had a more difficult time in deciding on where to send these names than it did for me to find the names.
Daily
-
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Fast enough? Is there any proof that it's looked at AT ALL when it comes to deleting offensive posts? -
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 28, 2008....
I agree, Sean, valid point.
Well, the other user on another SC_Help complaint was removed...DAYS after being reported.
-
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Well that's atleast proof this isn't entirely wasted energy, but were the posts removed or just the user -
vacantmind said on Apr 28, 2008....
Sean...It was Boys69 and it appears the posts and the user were removed. So, hopefully this will be the case this time. -
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 28, 2008....
Humm...good point, Sean. So what do I do...google it? -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Vacant seems to have it covered. Though to be fair we have no way of knowing if the blogger erased the posts on their own for whatever reason but I'm willing to take it on face value that we got what we wanted. -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 28, 2008....
Vacant seems to have it covered. Though to be fair we have no way of knowing if the blogger erased the posts on their own for whatever reason but I'm willing to take it on face value that we got what we wanted. -
ORANGESODAS said on Apr 28, 2008....
Don’t bet on it!
Boys69 wasn’t using the proper tags and warnings.
That was the ONLY reason he was removed!
-
silverwhisper said on Apr 29, 2008....
sean: you don't pay much attention, do you? :> SC commented that they nuked the posts by that user.
ed -
SeanRenaud said on Apr 29, 2008....
Then why is Fritt still running about, he's the original and he doesn't seem to be having any problems. But still if this is going to get those people banned and their posts deleted then carry on. -
ORANGESODAS said on Apr 29, 2008....
Don’t you people understand?
You can’t get rid of frizz boy and his ilk without establishing some kind of censorship!
And if you establish even limited censorship here at Soulcast, that’s the end of the truly free and unrestricted forum which exists here, and only here!
People would always be looking over their shoulders at the Soulcast censors, and inevitably start self-censoring!
And that would be the end of Soulcast as we know it!
I’d rather put up with child molesters than have that happen.
-
vacantmind said on Apr 29, 2008....
7. Code of Conduct
You agree that you will not, and it shall be a violation of this Agreement to:
B. Upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is unlawful, defamatory, libelous, harmful, offensive or hateful on the basis harassing, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate.
I think the code of conduct already shows there is a form of censorship in place. It is just a matter of whether Soulcast agrees that they are breaking this agreement.
-
silverwhisper said on Apr 29, 2008....
i think that the accusations of "censorship" are at least in part a symptom of an incomplete understanding of what censorship usually means: very specifically, governmental control over content.
ed -
dailyachesandpains said on Apr 29, 2008....
Ed...I am starting to think this is pointless. The first two listed here are still around. It's been over a day and I think I might have been mistaken that they'd be on top of this, I'm sorry if I was wrong. The outcry for them to be removed on LG's post got it done and it appeared that this was going to be a "Let us know and we'll do it ASAP" type of thing.I think I snapped because something may have been taken out of context out of a statement I made. I really want these sick people out of here, but I had to prove how damn easy it is to find them just by searching SC's OWN search box.Disappointed...that's all. I don't tend to snap, and even you know that when I do I'm typically calm about it with things around here. I don't broadcast it, but here I am broadcasting it. This is nothing personal to any individual person (my snap) and if it were, I would keep it to myself.DailyMedicatedHope you could follow what my voice wants to say out loud but what my brain can't type! -
silverwhisper said on Apr 29, 2008....
daily, i get frustrated, too--but remember, in the end, SC has always come through for us. :>
ed -
silverwhisper said on May 01, 2008....
spare us the self-aggrandizing martyr routine.
ed -
dailyachesandpains said on May 01, 2008....
So...Ed, anyway, about your last comment to me??Now do you still believe that"in the end, SC has always come through for us. :>"I held on to hope for how many days now? -
silverwhisper said on May 02, 2008....
daily, only time will tell.
ed
Comment on "Self Policing as Requested! Here's another user with lots of pages!"
Related Posts: