This is clipped from D6's link:
"The underlying truth of what I said remains, which is simply that people who have seen their way of life upended because of economic distress are frustrated and rightfully so," he was quoted as saying.
Obama's thesis is that government can actually do anything to provide economic "security" to 300 million Americans. It's already being demonstrated in France of all places that is simply untrue. Cradle to grave care on our scale is plainly unsustainable and yet this is Obama's main 'solution".
Yes, economic downturns hit the poor the hardest. That's one of the main reasons why the engine must be kept humming. But are raising taxes on "the wealthy" going to accompllish that? Will bailing out millions of people who bought homes well out of their price range accomplish that? I doubt it. Will pulling our troops out of Iraq and handing over the 2nd largest oil fields in the world to God knows who accomplish that? If you think yes, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Yet again, the Democrats have raised an incredibly wealthy man to play class warfare with the poor and rip off the middle class and small business owners. He may be brighter, more articulate, and more sensitive sounding, but in the final analysis he's just another leftist trotting out the same old leftist solutions.
John Kerry in a better fitting suit.