KeplerView reads (5):

The page you were looking for no longer exists

Here he goes again, should be the headline of the story concerning President Hugo Chavez's remarks to the press today.

 

President Hugo Chavez again threatened Saturday to halt oil exports if he sees US meddling in, or after, a hotly contested weekend referendum that could let him lead Venezuela for the rest of his life.

 

"If it starts a process of destabilization, incites a civil war, not only will the United States not get any of the 3.2 million barrels (produced per day in Venezuela according to official figures) but nothing will go onto the market, not a drop," Chavez warned, explaining he would stop all oil exports.

 

Opponents, whose number has swelled in past weeks with the defection of some Chavez allies, say the reforms would amount to making Venezuela a Cuba-like communist state, with an elected "dictator".

 

I hope you get a chance to read his comments in full at the link, and then please explain to me why we haven't "capped" this little Castro wannabe! I know one reason if that the "balls" have been cut from the CIA, so they can't do anything productive, because if they could we could have taken down Saddam without invading and wrecking the whole country of Iraq. He should have successfully "died" in his sleep, and then the fates deal with his nation. I say that not for anything other than his abuse of power and murder of his citizens, opponents, and the genocide against the Kurds. Just for those crimes he should have been "retired"!

 

There are many times in our recent history from the Bay of Pigs on when the CIA, totally messed up, and created more enemies, than allies. The agency needs to be reinvigorated with professionals, that understand the rights and wrongs, of their missions, and when they should be used. President Chavez is a case in point, and may he be "allowed" to sleep, the sleep of the dead, and the sooner the better, for his countrymen, and the world...well except for his sympatico ally, Iranian President Ahmanejidad, and maybe it will give "him" a little start, the morning he reads that his close friend has passed on "peacefully", in his sleep!!

 

I don't usually advocate this kind of activity, as I believe in Karma, but the Karmic "blowback" of this activity for our country, would surely be much less, than the "blowback" we are creating in Iraq, and elsewhere. When that kicks us back, we are going to think 9/11 was a "day at the beach" in comparison. I don't wish for it to happen, but I can see it coming, like a light at the end of the tunnel, and it turns out to be a high speed freight train, barreling at us!! Scary times ahead!!

 

capped



del.icio.us Digg reddit StumbleUpon

Comments

  • bloc said on Dec 03, 2007....
    I've never understood this focus on Chavez, and I've never understood the assassination doctrine.

    1. Chavez
    Why do we care so much about him? Why not the same hatred for the idiots that run saudi arabia who are far far worse than this guy? Why not the same hatred for that dictator running pakistan? I can go on and on, but I think the point is clear. We are told to hate Chavez because they have oil and he doesn't do our bidding. I only ask for some semblance of consistency.

    2. assassination
    why exactly do you want ot kill this guy? How would you feel if people were saying the same about American presidents when they piss off the rest of the world? One exammple, the Bush Admin has kidnapped a canadian, a german, and a australian and tortured them. Surely this is far more provocative than anything Chavez has done yet I would not stand for some other country trying to assassinate Bush. Nor will I call for assassinating someone like Chavez.
  • bloc said on Dec 03, 2007....
    read here for examples.
  • KeplerView said on Dec 03, 2007....
    bloc,
     
    Thanks for the comments, I guess it was more frustration than anything else, and I see that Venezuela has rejected his referendum.
     
    I understand your aversion to assassination, but don't you think that sometimes it would be useful and less costly than war. The case of Saddam is very telling, we should never have invaded and wrecked that nation, but IF we thought he had to be removed, wouldn't it have been better for everyone, except Saddam, to have him pass away "peacefully" in his sleep.
     
    Take Care and may we take a lesson from Venezuela democratic vote and Chavez's acceptance of the vote.
  • bloc said on Dec 03, 2007....
    but how would you feel if people started saying/doing the same thing about our presidents?
  • KeplerView said on Dec 03, 2007....
    bloc,
     
    I don't know for sure? I just think that in the case of Saddam it would have been one or a few lives (bodyguards) instead of the many thousands that have now died, and are still dying.
     
     I do appreciate your being against all assassinations, but I am trying to use the most expedient, and least violent way possible, when truly "bad" leaders need to be removed.
     
    Thanks for making me think, instead of just reacting, like I did with Chavez!!
  • bloc said on Dec 03, 2007....
    I'm not against all assassinations, but it would be an exceptionally rare thing. I honestly don't understand the focus we see on chavez. Actually, I do understand it. He has oil and he doesn't do what we want. However, there are far worse leaders in the world, many of whom we support to varying degrees. 

    I have yet to get someone to convince that Bush isn't worse than Chavez. Bush has asserted the power to arrest americans with out due process by labeling them enemy combatants, he's asserted the right to torture enemy combatants, he's used thousands of signing statements to ignore laws, he's run very questionable practices in secret, his administration outed a CIA agent, and he's directly broken numerous laws including the Constitution.

    Why again should we kill Chavez? Why do we even care about Chavez? 

Comment on "Why Haven't We Capped This Idiot And Apologies To My Liberal Friends"


(Separate tags using commas, for example: New York, dating, vegetarian)
Comment Anonymously

Or is someone trying to cover Nancy Pelosi's nutcase rantings.......